3014218071 王漢超
Q: Below are two faulty programs. Each includes a test case that results in failure. Answer the following questions (in the next slide) about each program.
- Identify the fault.
- If possible, identify a test case that does not execute the fault. (Reachability)
- If possible, identify a test case that executes the fault, but does not result in an error state.
- If possible identify a test case that results in an error, but not a failure.
public int findLast (int[] x, int y) { /* Pro.1
* Effects: If x==null, throw NullPointerException * else return the index of the last element * in x that equals y. * If no such element exists, return -1 */ for (int i=x.length-1; i > 0; i--) { if (x[i] == y) { return i; } } return -1; } // test: x=[2, 3, 5]; y = 2 // Expected = 0
A1:
The fault: When x != null, x[0] will not be checked, even if only x[0] equals to y;
x = [2, 3, 5]; y = 2; -> return -1
Test case 1: x = []; y = 2; -> throw NullPointerException, not execute the fault.
Test case 2: x = [0, 1, 2]; y = 2; -> i = 2, return 2, not result in an error state.
Test case 3: x = [0, 1, 3]; y = 2; -> i = 1, return -1, not a failure.
public static int lastZero (int[] x) { /* Pro.2
* Effects: if x==null, throw NullPointerException
* else return the index of the LAST 0 in x. * Return -1 if 0 does not occur in x
*/ for (int i = 0; i < x.length; i++) {
if (x[i] == 0) { return i; } }
return -1; } // test: x=[0, 1, 0]
// Expect: return 2
A2:
The fault: When x != null, the index of the FIRST 0 in x will be returned but not the LAST 0.
x = [0, 1, 0 ]; -> return 0
Test case 1: x = []; -> throw NullPointerException, not execute the fault.
Test case 2: x = [1, 2, 3]; -> i = 3, return -1, not result in an error state.
Test case 3: x = [1, 0, 1]; -> i = 1, return 1, not a failure.