the latest Ext2Fsd(ext2fsd-0.69) doesn't work after windows 10 --- solved using ext2fsd-0.53 or 0.68

 

https://github.com/matt-wu/Ext3Fsd/issues/14

https://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2fsd/files/Ext2fsd/

https://www.paragon-software.com/business/extfs-for-windows/

 

 

 Open

Doesn't work after windows 10 creators update #14

Barteks2x opened this issue on 28 Oct 2017 · 38 comments

Comments

Barteks2x commented on 28 Oct 2017

The service refuses to start. This is all I know.

dd-han commented on 23 Nov 2017

Downgrade to 0.68 will works.

but 0.68 could corrupt your data, so I switch to Paragon ExtFS.

Collaborator

ngkaho1234 commented on 23 Nov 2017

@dd-han Ext2Fsd 0.69 was released 3 days after the issue was opened. What problem did you encounter with 0.69?

dd-han commented on 23 Nov 2017

? 5

kid1412621 commented on 2 Dec 2017

I have the same issue,firstly I thought something going wrong during the installation.
But after trying several times I changed my mind.
As @dd-han said, 0.68 is fine ,but it causes superlock during linux booting.
However 0.69 cannot work properly.It really heart-broken.

转存失败重新上传取消

nmlgc commented on 8 Dec 2017

Same here, ext4 is broken on 0.69. Couldn't even get it to work by reinstalling 0.68, strangely enough.

DaJakerBoss commented on 31 Dec 2017

It works perfectly for me, and I am using the latest insider preview for Windows 10 and the latest Ext2Fsd. No write privileges, but I can read...

Target partition is a 64-bit EXT4 partition.

kid1412621 commented on 30 Jan 2018

@DaJakerBoss which win version? Now I am using win 10.0.17074 and ext3fsd 0.69. The issue is still not fixed.

DaJakerBoss commented on 30 Jan 2018

@kid1412621 The latest Insider Preview (Fast)

kid1412621 commented on 30 Jan 2018

@DaJakerBoss weird, insider slow here. My Linux portion is ext4. But it shows ext3 in ext3fsd. ?

 DaJakerBoss commented on 30 Jan 2018

I am using build 17063 (updating to 17083 as we speak), and I think it identifies it as EXT4, what did you use to make the partition?

kid1412621 commented on 30 Jan 2018

@DaJakerBoss I don't make the partition. I just formatted the partition during installing the linux system.
I cannot wait for the latest version to fix this. This issue bothers me for a long time.

 DaJakerBoss commented on 30 Jan 2018

What Linux operating system did you install?

kid1412621 commented on 31 Jan 2018

@DaJakerBoss Ubuntu 17.10

 DaJakerBoss commented on 31 Jan 2018

Hmmm... I am using 18.04 dev so that might be it?

kid1412621 commented on 31 Jan 2018

@DaJakerBoss ? u suggest to update Ubuntu?U think thia bug is duo to Linux?

 DaJakerBoss commented on 31 Jan 2018

Umm no I was just saying I had a different version of Ubuntu. Do you have a GPT or MBR partition table.

kid1412621 commented on 1 Feb 2018 • 

edited 

 

dd-han commented on 3 Feb 2018 • 

edited 

UPDATE: not only GPT problem

looks like MBR (Disk1) works fine and GPT (Disk0) not working

but reproduce fail on my removable storage device...

 DaJakerBoss commented on 5 Feb 2018

I have an MBR system. If it has to do with the partition table than we have issues.

Collaborator

ngkaho1234 commented on 13 Feb 2018 • 

edited 

@kid1412621 It shows the filesystem as EXT3 in Ext2Mgr also if the driver refuses to mount it. It can be related to incompatible features, such as 64bit. See e7c1142 .

If you want to know more about your EXT4 filesystem, you might use debugfs like this: debugfs -R stats PATH_TO_VOLUME .

Feel free to mail to me if you have any inquiries.

sonvirgo commented on 18 Mar 2018

Same here, WINDOWS 10 170928, Ubuntu 17.04. Only format dialog?

 DaJakerBoss commented on 19 Mar 2018

just to be clear we have tried unsigned drivers boot in Windows, correct

…

kid1412621 commented on 9 Apr 2018

@ngkaho1234 Thanks for reply.But I have no idea how to use this tool.
Could you guys add a wiki page for it?

Hey @DaJakerBoss , I just changed my laptop's motherboard,and reinstalled dual systems(Win 10 and Ubuntu 17.10),still cannot mount ext4 partition properly.

 DaJakerBoss commented on 10 Apr 2018 • 

edited 

Hey @kid1412621 You didn't really have to do all that (and hope you didn't) just so you could mount your ext4. IIRC an update had some issues with 64-bit EXT4 mounting, and had potential to mess up your partition data. The latest update (0.69) should fix that, so make sure you update.

Don't use Ext2Fsd 0.68 or earlier versions with latest Ubuntu or Debian systems. Ext2Fsd 0.68 cannot process EXT4 with 64-BIT mode enabled, then it could corrupt your data. Very sorry for this disaster issue, I'm working on an improvement.

Also, one quick question, are you using an MBR or GPT partition table? I don't know if this would be any cause but I'm collecting info. I will look for more info regarding your situation.

DaJakerBoss commented on 10 Apr 2018

@dd-han going back to your comment from earlier, USB and SSD/HDD are handled differently by the system as far as I know. Different drivers and such. I will try to recreate this with my computer at home.

Does anyone have a system that uses different inputs for USB (2.0, 3.0, 3.1/Thunderbolt)? It would be interesting to see if interfacing has any effect on this. I'm going to try SATA and SATA->USB-3 connectors to see myself.

kid1412621 commented on 10 Apr 2018 • 

edited 

@DaJakerBoss I done that because of fixing hardware issue. I didn't do that for mount ext4 on purpose.
I am using the latest version of Ext3Fsd. And of course,GPT.
If there is possibility to relate to unsigned drivers boot?

转存失败重新上传取消

marcosx86 commented on 25 Jul 2018

Using Ext2fsD 0.69 on Windows 10 build 1803, my system stop booting after installing it. Solved by killing ext2fsd.sys on system32/drivers...

转存失败重新上传取消

nmlgc commented on 28 Jul 2018 • 

edited 

As a workaround for the now dropped 64-bit volume support, it might be worth a try to simply convert the file system to 32-bit using resize2fs -s from a Linux system. Worked fine for my 2 TB drive; with the default block size of 4 KiB, 64-bit block counts would only really be necessary for ≥16 TB drives.

 marcosx86 commented on 28 Jul 2018

Should not be easier and better compat to ignore 64-bit enabled partitions? Anyways, I'll check if it is the cause, because I have the same HD config on my desktop (Win10 + Deb8 Ext4) and it worked fine.

…

kid1412621 commented on 16 Feb

https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/commandline/2019/02/15/whats-new-for-wsl-in-windows-10-version-1903/

Does this mean windows have native support for ext4?

Collaborator

 ngkaho1234 commented on 16 Feb

Seems no. As they clearly mentioned that the functionality was implemented with 9p protocol.

…

 kid1412621 commented on 17 Feb

What is 9p protocol?

…

achan-pancan commented on 2 Apr

isolationism commented on 18 Apr

I'm seeing exactly this behaviour as well, @achan-pancan. Windows 10, trying to mount an EXT3 (Linux Mint) partition on an external M.2 NVMe drive.

AdamSFX commented on 23 Apr

I have the same issue as @achan-pancan and @isolationism - Windows 10 Pro v1803, I just get a format disk message when I try to access a drive, windows shows the service as running, but Ext2 shows it as not running and says it can't be started.

isolationism commented on 23 Apr

For what it's worth @AdamSFX, my explorations online uncovered that an older release of ext2fsd, ext2fsd-0.53, works for me (and others similarly afflicted) in Windows 10 — though I have so far only entrusted it with read-only operations. YMMV.

AdamSFX commented on 23 Apr

Thank you! Yes this works for me also.
I am using an external SSD to transfer large video files from a LINUX based camera so I don't have OS corruption issues to worry about and I have been able to read and write to the drive without problems using ext2fsd 0.53

zeronote commented on 18 Jun • 

edited 

I have the same issues on Windows 10 Pro as pointed out by others, solved using ext2fsd-0.53.