一
hi folks:
i am building OOO320 on windows xp --cygwin. I am having one problem in
"extensions" module:
Making: http://www.cnblogs.com/../wntmsci12.pro/slo/so_activex.obj
c:/PROGRA~1/MICROS~1.0/VC/bin/cl.exe -Zm500 -Zc:forScope,wchar_t- -GR
-c -nologo -Gs -Gy -Ob1 -Oxs -Oy- -DENABLE_LAYOUT=0
-DENABLE_LAYOUT_EXPERIMENTAL=0 -Gd -I.
-Ihttp://www.cnblogs.com/../wntmsci12.pro/inc/so_activex
-Ic:/PROGRA~1/MICROS~1.0/VC/atlmfc/include
-Ihttp://www.cnblogs.com/../wntmsci12.pro/misc -I../inc -Ihttp://www.cnblogs.com/../inc/pch
-Ihttp://www.cnblogs.com/../inc -Ihttp://www.cnblogs.com/../WIN/inc -Ihttp://www.cnblogs.com/../wntmsci12.pro/inc -I.
-Ie:/ooo320/solver/320/wntmsci12.pro/inc/stl
-Ie:/ooo320/solver/320/wntmsci12.pro/inc/external
-Ie:/ooo320/solver/320/wntmsci12.pro/inc
-Ie:/ooo320/solenv/wntmsci12/inc -Ie:/ooo320/solenv/inc
-Ie:/ooo320/res -Ie:/ooo320/solver/320/wntmsci12.pro/inc/stl
-Id:/OOEnv/JDK15~1.0_1/include/win32 -Id:/OOEnv/JDK15~1.0_1/include
-Id:/OOEnv/PSDK/include -Ic:/PROGRA~1/MICROS~1.0/VC/include
-Id:/OOEnv/directx/include -Id:/OOEnv/directx/include
-Ie:/ooo320/solver/320/wntmsci12.pro/inc/offuh -I. -Ihttp://www.cnblogs.com/../res -I.
-Wall -wd4061 -wd4127 -wd4191 -wd4217 -wd4250 -wd4251 -wd4275
-wd4290 -wd4294 -wd4355 -wd4511 -wd4512 -wd4514 -wd4611 -wd4625
-wd4626 -wd4640 -wd4675 -wd4710 -wd4711 -wd4786 -wd4800 -wd4820
-wd4503 -wd4619 -wd4365 -wd4668 -wd4738 -wd4826 -wd4350 -wd4505
-wd4692 -wd4189 -wd4005 -wd4180 -DWNT -DWNT -DNT351 -DMSC
-DM1500 -DINTEL -D_X86_=1 -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE
-D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE -D_CRT_NON_CONFORMING_SWPRINTFS
-DFULL_DESK -DBOOST_MEM_FN_ENABLE_CDECL -DSTLPORT_VERSION=400 -D_MT
-DWINVER=0x0500 -D_WIN32_IE=0x0500 -DCPPU_ENV=msci -DSUPD=320
-DPRODUCT -DNDEBUG -DPRODUCT_FULL -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DOPTIMIZE -DCUI
-DSOLAR_JAVA -DSHAREDLIB -D_DLL_ -DWIN32 -D_MT -D_DLL -DWIN32 -D_MT
-D_DLL -DEXCEPTIONS_OFF
-Fohttp://www.cnblogs.com/../wntmsci12.pro/slo/so_activex.obj
e:/ooo320/extensions/source/activex/main/so_activex.cpp
so_activex.cpp
e:ooo320extensionssourceactivexmainstdafx2.h(29) : fatal error
C1083: Cannot open include file: 'atlbase.h': No such file or
directory
dmake: Error code 2, while making 'http://www.cnblogs.com/../wntmsci12.pro/slo/so_activex.obj'
many thanks
micheal
Hi Micheal,
I guess you build with the Micosoft VisualStudio Express Edition which
lacks some advanced features. One of them is the Advanced Template
Library (atl). The Active X part makes heavy use of ATL but is not
needed to build OpenOffice.org. Just call configure with
--disable_activex and you will be able to build further on.
For more information please read the building guide for Windows.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide/Building_on_Windows
Regards,
Carsten
Are you sure that --disable-activex is enough? There's also --disable-atl.
Regards,
Mathias
二
Hi Mathias,
Mathias Bauer schrieb:
> Regina Henschel wrote:
>
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
>>> Hi Regina,
>>>
>>>> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
>>>> ERROR: File not found: emboleobj.dll
>>>> ERROR: File not found: emsermi.dll
>>>> ERROR: File not found: oleautobridge.uno.dll
>>> Sounds like some OLE-related module has not been built (correctly).
>>> According to trunk, emboleobj is built in module embeddedobj, emsermi in
>>> embedserv, and oleautobridge in extensions/source/ole.
>>>
>>> All three libs have in common that they are/should not packed (if not
>>> even built) when --disable-atl is given (
>>> http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/xref/Current%20(trunk)/scp2/source/ooo/file_library_ooo.scp#418
>>> http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/xref/Current%20(trunk)/scp2/source/ooo/file_library_ooo.scp#1037
>>> )
>>>
>>> This either means your build of scp2 was not successful, or contained
>>> remaints of a previous (non-disable-atl) build,
>> I think, that is it. I forgot DISABLE_ALT. Is it enough to put
>> DISABLE_ATL="TRUE"
>> export DISABLE_ATL
>> at the end of winenv.set.sh?
>>
>> At the end of winenv.set.sh there is a line "unset", which contains
>> DISABLE_ATL. Is it correct in that line or do I have to remove
>> DISABLE_ATL in that line?
>
> You should remove it. You can also run configure again, now with
> --disable-atl.
I have started with a new configure. Result comes tomorrow.
Many thanks to all for your kind assistance.
Regina
