java关于Integer设置-128到127的静态缓存
今天在一个java群里,看到有个群友问到如下为什么第一个为true,第二个为false。
System.out.println(Integer.valueOf("50")==Integer.valueOf("50")); //true
System.out.println(Integer.valueOf("200")==Integer.valueOf("200")); //false
由于一开始他问的第二句,我还想当然的以为是new的对象,肯定不一样,但是为什么第一句为true呢,后来通过查找资料发现
1、https://www.zhihu.com/question/29879295/answer/102396251
2、http://blog.csdn.net/chengzhezhijian/article/details/9628251
/** * Returns a <tt>Integer</tt> instance representing the specified * <tt>int</tt> value. * If a new <tt>Integer</tt> instance is not required, this method * should generally be used in preference to the constructor * {@link #Integer(int)}, as this method is likely to yield * significantly better space and time performance by caching * frequently requested values. * * @param i an <code>int</code> value. * @return a <tt>Integer</tt> instance representing <tt>i</tt>. * @since 1.5 */ public static Integer valueOf(int i) { if(i >= -128 && i <= IntegerCache.high) return IntegerCache.cache[i + 128]; else return new Integer(i); }
private static class IntegerCache { static final int high; static final Integer cache[]; static { final int low = -128; // high value may be configured by property int h = 127; if (integerCacheHighPropValue != null) { // Use Long.decode here to avoid invoking methods that // require Integer's autoboxing cache to be initialized int i = Long.decode(integerCacheHighPropValue).intValue(); i = Math.max(i, 127); // Maximum array size is Integer.MAX_VALUE h = Math.min(i, Integer.MAX_VALUE - -low); } high = h; cache = new Integer[(high - low) + 1]; int j = low; for(int k = 0; k < cache.length; k++) cache[k] = new Integer(j++); } private IntegerCache() {} }
valueOf会将常用的值(-128 to 127)cache起来。当i值在这个范围时,会比用构造方法Integer(int)效率和空间上更好。
梅花香自古寒来