使用DynamicMethod替代反射，提高100倍的性能！（附源码）

------------------

前言

------------------ 

反射性能实在是太恶劣，在通讯系统、数据库系统中已经无法忍受了。于是我在codeproject上找到一篇使用DynamicMethod的替代方法。http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/Dynamic_Code_Generation.aspx

 

可是作者实在也太简陋了，目前仅支持FIeld / Property，于是我扩展了。

1.支持FIeld / 带参数Constructor / Property / Index 

2.操作过程和反射过程一摸一样。

 

------------------

代码测试结果 

------------------

测试对象：

class SomeClass
    {
        public int name;
        public string sname;

        public SomeClass()
        {
        }
        public SomeClass(string name)
        {
            this.sname = name;

        }

        public int Name
        {
            get { return name; }
            set { name = value; }
        }
        public string Sname
        {
            get { return sname; }
            set { sname = value; }
        }
        public string this[int index, string name, int a, int b, string c, double d]
        {
            get
            {
                return index.ToString() + name;
            }
            set
            {
            }
        }
    }

 

 

SetFIeld的反射 VS 动态编译

        //set field
        public void test003()
        {
            SomeClass c = new SomeClass();

            FieldInfo field = c.GetType().GetFields()[1];

            StartTest("begin reflection.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++)
            {
                field.SetValue(c, "test");
            }

            EndTest("end reflection");

            IDynamicFieldInfo dfield = new DynamicType(c.GetType()).GetFields()[1];

            StartTest("begin dynamic.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++)
            {
                dfield.SetValue(c, "test");
            }

            EndTest("end dynamic");
        }

 

测试结果：

------ Test started: Assembly: Pixysoft.Framework.Reflection.dll ------

begin reflection.
end reflection
00:00:28.3593750

begin dynamic.
end dynamic
00:00:00.2500000


1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 28.70 seconds (Ad hoc).

 

性能提高100多倍。

 

 

GetFIeld  反射VS动态编译

public void test004()
        {
            SomeClass c = new SomeClass();

            FieldInfo field = c.GetType().GetFields()[1];

            StartTest("begin reflection.");

            field.SetValue(c, "test");

            for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++)
            {
                field.GetValue(c);
            }

            EndTest("end reflection");




            IDynamicFieldInfo dfield = new DynamicType(c.GetType()).GetFields()[1];

            dfield.SetValue(c, "test");

            StartTest("begin dynamic.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++)
            {
                dfield.GetValue(c);
            }

            EndTest("end dynamic");
        }

 

测试结果

------ Test started: Assembly: Pixysoft.Framework.Reflection.dll ------

begin reflection.
end reflection
00:00:18.9531250

begin dynamic.
end dynamic
00:00:00.2031250


1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 19.25 seconds (Ad hoc).

 

提高接近100倍

 

GetProperty 反射VS动态编译

public void test006()
        {
            SomeClass c = new SomeClass();

            PropertyInfo property = c.GetType().GetProperties()[1];

            StartTest("begin reflection.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            {
                property.GetValue(c, null);
            }

            EndTest("end reflection");




            IDynamicPropertyInfo dproperty = new DynamicType(c.GetType()).GetProperties()[1];

            StartTest("begin dynamic.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            {
                dproperty.GetValue(c, null);
            }

            EndTest("end dynamic");
        }

 

测试结果 

------ Test started: Assembly: Pixysoft.Framework.Reflection.dll ------

begin reflection.
end reflection
00:00:05.5312500

begin dynamic.
end dynamic
00:00:00.0468750


1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 5.66 seconds (Ad hoc).

 

依然100倍！！！ 

 

SetProperty 反射VS动态编译

public void test005()
        {
            SomeClass c = new SomeClass();

            PropertyInfo property = c.GetType().GetProperties()[0];

            StartTest("begin reflection.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            {
                property.SetValue(c, i, null);
            }

            EndTest("end reflection");

            IDynamicPropertyInfo dproperty = new DynamicType(c.GetType()).GetProperties()[0];

            StartTest("begin dynamic.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            {
                dproperty.SetValue(c, i, null);
            }

            EndTest("end dynamic");
        }

 

 测试结果 

------ Test started: Assembly: Pixysoft.Framework.Reflection.dll ------

begin reflection.
end reflection
00:00:09.0625000

begin dynamic.
end dynamic
00:00:00.0468750


1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 9.20 seconds (Ad hoc).

 

遥遥领先250倍

 

Constructor 反射VS动态编译 

public void test008()
        {
            Type type = typeof(SomeClass);

            StartTest("begin reflection.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            {
                object result = Activator.CreateInstance(type, "hello");
            }

            EndTest("end reflection");


            StartTest("begin dynamic.");

            IDynamicConstructorInfo dConstructorInfo = new DynamicType(type).GetConstructors()[1];

            for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            {
                object result = dConstructorInfo.Invoke(new object[] { "hello" });
            }

            EndTest("end dynamic");


            StartTest("begin dynamic.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            {
                object result = new DynamicType(type).GetConstructors()[1].Invoke(new object[] { "hello" });
            }

            EndTest("end dynamic");
        } 

测试结果 

------ Test started: Assembly: Pixysoft.Framework.Reflection.dll ------

begin reflection.
end reflection
00:00:07.5937500

begin dynamic.
end dynamic
00:00:00.1250000

begin dynamic.
end dynamic
00:00:01.2187500


1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 9.02 seconds (Ad hoc).

 

60倍左右。

 

GetIndex 反射VS动态编译

public void test007()
        {
            SomeClass c = new SomeClass();

            Type type = c.GetType();

            PropertyInfo property = type.GetProperties()[2];

            StartTest("begin reflection.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            {
                property.SetValue(c, i.ToString(), new object[] { 0, "", 0, 0, "", 0 });
            }

            EndTest("end reflection");

            IDynamicPropertyInfo dproperty = new DynamicType(type).GetProperties()[2];

            StartTest("begin dynamic.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            {
                dproperty.SetValue(c, i.ToString(), new object[] { 0, "", 0, 0, "", (double)0 });
            }

            EndTest("end dynamic");


            StartTest("begin dynamic set property.");

            for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            {
                new DynamicType(type).GetProperties()[2].SetValue(c, i.ToString(), new object[] { 0, "", 0, 0, "", (double)0 });
            }

            EndTest("end dynamic");
        }

 

测试结果 

------ Test started: Assembly: Pixysoft.Framework.Reflection.dll ------

begin reflection.
end reflection
00:00:07.2656250

begin dynamic.
end dynamic
00:00:00.5000000

begin dynamic set property.
end dynamic
00:00:01.7968750


1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 9.64 seconds (Ad hoc).

 

30倍左右（性能损失在了装箱拆箱） 

 

----------------------

源码下载与备注

----------------------

http://www.boxcn.net/shared/8qqgob51hi

空间由boxcn.net提供，放心下载。

 

开始的时候，想到老赵的反射开源，可是他用Linq去实现，在dotnet 2.0不支持，而现状是大部分服务器应用还是dotnet 2.0, 只好放弃。

 

之后codeproject找到了篇文章介绍了DynamicMethod，可是作者写的比较龊，于是我稍微扩展了，直接参考Type的模型设计，得到了DynamicType，然后接下来的操作也TYpe一样。

 

目前MethodInfo无法使用DynamicMethod替代，因为存在了范型，无法使用通用的delegate去模拟。。。 

 

本来以为，通过DynamicMethod，最少能提高性能10倍吧，可是用在了项目上，却发现没有变化！！！！  

我在序列化中使用，却发现性能根本没有太大的提升，后来发现反射去Get/Set实际占性能损失很小，另外一大部分在

1. 集合的操作（List / Dictionary / ...)

2. Type.GetProperties 等类似的操作。

3. attribute的获取操作。

没办法，看来要继续努力，接下来打算把整个Type对象使用Dynamic去托管了。 

 

引用至：http://www.cnblogs.com/zc22/archive/2010/06/01/1749459.html