SQL KEEP 窗口函数等价改写案例

一哥们出条sql题给我玩,将下面sql改成不使用keep分析函数的写法。

select deptno,
       ename,
       sal,
       hiredate,
       min(sal) keep(dense_rank first order by hiredate) over(partition by deptno) min_sal,
       max(sal) keep(dense_rank last order by hiredate) over(partition by deptno) max_sal
  from emp;

我第一次改错了,被这哥们喷菜鸡,我草。

-- 错误等价改写,逻辑不等价
with x as (
select e1.deptno,
       e1.ename,
       e1.sal,
       e1.hiredate,
       row_number() over (partition by DEPTNO order by HIREDATE) rn_first,
       row_number() over (partition by DEPTNO order by HIREDATE DESC) rn_last
from EMP e1)
select
    e.deptno,
    e.ename,
    e.sal,
    e.hiredate,
    x1.SAL,
    x2.SAL
from emp e
    inner join x x1 on e.DEPTNO = x1.DEPTNO and x1.rn_first = 1
    inner join x x2 on e.DEPTNO = x2.DEPTNO and x2.rn_last = 1;

我换了张数据量更大点的表测试下,发现上面改写是逻辑有问题,如果同一个组内有相同日期的分组字段内有NULL值的,确实会导致SQL结果集不一致。

-- 将EMP表替换成EMPLOYEES,如果使用上面等价改写就错误了。
select DEPARTMENT_ID,
       FIRST_NAME,
       SALARY,
       HIRE_DATE,
       min(SALARY) keep(dense_rank first order by HIRE_DATE) over(partition by DEPARTMENT_ID) min_sal,
       max(SALARY) keep(dense_rank last order by HIRE_DATE) over(partition by DEPARTMENT_ID) max_sal
from EMPLOYEES;

 等价改写方案一、标量子查询改写,增加了分组字段内有NULL值的逻辑和处理一个组内有相同日期的逻辑。

select e.DEPARTMENT_ID,
       e.FIRST_NAME,
       e.SALARY,
       e.HIRE_DATE,
       (select MIN_SALARY
        from (select DEPARTMENT_ID, MIN(SALARY) MIN_SALARY
              from (select DEPARTMENT_ID,
                           SALARY,
                           HIRE_DATE,
                           dense_rank() over (PARTITION BY DEPARTMENT_ID ORDER BY HIRE_DATE) RN
                    from EMPLOYEES)
              WHERE RN = 1
              GROUP BY DEPARTMENT_ID) e1
        where case when e1.DEPARTMENT_ID is null then 99999 else e1.DEPARTMENT_ID end = case when e.DEPARTMENT_ID is null then 99999 else e.DEPARTMENT_ID end) a_min,
       (select MAX_SALARY
        from (select DEPARTMENT_ID, MAX(SALARY) MAX_SALARY
              from (select DEPARTMENT_ID,
                           SALARY,
                           HIRE_DATE,
                           dense_rank() over (PARTITION BY DEPARTMENT_ID ORDER BY HIRE_DATE DESC) RN
                    from EMPLOYEES)
              WHERE RN = 1
              GROUP BY DEPARTMENT_ID) e1
        where case when e1.DEPARTMENT_ID is null then 99999 else e1.DEPARTMENT_ID end = case when e.DEPARTMENT_ID is null then 99999 else e.DEPARTMENT_ID end ) a_max
FROM EMPLOYEES e;

差集比较后是等价的:


 等价改写方案二、使用 first_value、last_value 窗口函数实现

select DEPARTMENT_ID,
       FIRST_NAME,
       SALARY,
       HIRE_DATE,
       first_value(SALARY) OVER (PARTITION BY DEPARTMENT_ID ORDER BY HIRE_DATE range between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) AS min_sal,
       last_value(SALARY) OVER (PARTITION BY DEPARTMENT_ID ORDER BY HIRE_DATE range between unbounded preceding and unbounded following ) AS max_sal
from EMPLOYEES;

差集比较后也是是等价的:


等价改写方案三、使用 LEFT JOIN + 窗口函数实现

select a.department_id, a.first_name, a.salary, b.min_sal, b.max_sal
from EMPLOYEES a
         left join
     (select min(case when rn1 = 1 then salary end) min_sal,
             max(case when rn2 = 1 then salary end) max_sal,
             department_id
      from (select salary,
                   department_id,
                   dense_rank() over (partition by department_id order by hire_date)      rn1,
                   dense_rank() over (partition by department_id order by hire_date desc) rn2
            from EMPLOYEES)
      group by department_id) b on decode(a.department_id, null, 99999999, a.department_id) =
                                   decode(b.department_id, null, 99999999, b.department_id);

这个也是等价的,偷懒就不放对比差集了。


 

posted @ 2024-05-30 15:42  小至尖尖  阅读(315)  评论(0编辑  收藏  举报