Cowboy 源码分析(二十一)
2012-06-25 00:39 rhinovirus 阅读(1770) 评论(0) 编辑 收藏 举报大家好,今天继续跟大家分享Cowboy的源码分析,这一篇,我们看下cowboy_http_protocol:onrequest/2函数,完整代码如下:
%% Call the global onrequest callback. The callback can send a reply, %% in which case we consider the request handled and move on to the next %% one. Note that since we haven't dispatched yet, we don't know the %% handler, host_info, path_info or bindings yet. -spec onrequest(#http_req{}, #state{}) -> ok. onrequest(Req, State=#state{onrequest=undefined}) -> dispatch(Req, State); onrequest(Req, State=#state{onrequest=OnRequest}) -> Req2 = OnRequest(Req), case Req2#http_req.resp_state of waiting -> dispatch(Req2, State); _ -> next_request(Req2, State, ok) end.
这里我们从Debugger可以看到,onrequest=undefined,所以这里我们从第一个分支来看,另一个分支,等以后具体用到的时候再看。我们从代码中可以看到,第一个分支只是简单的调用了cowboy_http_protocol:dispatch/2 函数,代码如下:
-spec dispatch(#http_req{}, #state{}) -> ok. dispatch(Req=#http_req{host=Host, path=Path}, State=#state{dispatch=Dispatch}) -> case cowboy_dispatcher:match(Host, Path, Dispatch) of {ok, Handler, Opts, Binds, HostInfo, PathInfo} -> handler_init(Req#http_req{host_info=HostInfo, path_info=PathInfo, bindings=Binds}, State#state{handler={Handler, Opts}}); {error, notfound, host} -> error_terminate(400, State); {error, notfound, path} -> error_terminate(404, State) end.
调用函数时,参数如下:
< Host = [<<"localhost">>]
< Path = []
< Dispatch = [{'_',[{[<<"websocket">>],websocket_handler,[]},
{[<<"eventsource">>],eventsource_handler,[]},
{[<<"eventsource">>,<<"live">>],eventsource_emitter,[]},
{'_',default_handler,[]}]}]
前面2个参数,之前都见过了,最后一个,不知道大家还记得吗?这个参数,是在cowboy_examples:start/2传递进来的,如下:
start(_Type, _Args) -> Dispatch = [ {'_', [ {[<<"websocket">>], websocket_handler, []}, {[<<"eventsource">>], eventsource_handler, []}, {[<<"eventsource">>, <<"live">>], eventsource_emitter, []}, {'_', default_handler, []} ]} ], cowboy:start_listener(my_http_listener, 100, cowboy_tcp_transport, [{port, 8080}], cowboy_http_protocol, [{dispatch, Dispatch}] ), cowboy:start_listener(my_https_listener, 100, cowboy_ssl_transport, [ {port, 8443}, {certfile, "priv/ssl/cert.pem"}, {keyfile, "priv/ssl/key.pem"}, {password, "cowboy"}], cowboy_http_protocol, [{dispatch, Dispatch}] ), cowboy_examples_sup:start_link().
好,弄清楚了参数,我们来看具体逻辑:
case cowboy_dispatcher:match(Host, Path, Dispatch) of
这里调用 cowboy_dispatcher:match/3 函数,代码如下:
%% @doc Match hostname tokens and path tokens against dispatch rules. %% %% It is typically used for matching tokens for the hostname and path of %% the request against a global dispatch rule for your listener. %% %% Dispatch rules are a list of <em>{Hostname, PathRules}</em> tuples, with %% <em>PathRules</em> being a list of <em>{Path, HandlerMod, HandlerOpts}</em>. %% %% <em>Hostname</em> and <em>Path</em> are match rules and can be either the %% atom <em>'_'</em>, which matches everything for a single token, the atom %% <em>'*'</em>, which matches everything for the rest of the tokens, or a %% list of tokens. Each token can be either a binary, the atom <em>'_'</em>, %% the atom '...' or a named atom. A binary token must match exactly, %% <em>'_'</em> matches everything for a single token, <em>'...'</em> matches %% everything for the rest of the tokens and a named atom will bind the %% corresponding token value and return it. %% %% The list of hostname tokens is reversed before matching. For example, if %% we were to match "www.ninenines.eu", we would first match "eu", then %% "ninenines", then "www". This means that in the context of hostnames, %% the <em>'...'</em> atom matches properly the lower levels of the domain %% as would be expected. %% %% When a result is found, this function will return the handler module and %% options found in the dispatch list, a key-value list of bindings and %% the tokens that were matched by the <em>'...'</em> atom for both the %% hostname and path. -spec match(Host::tokens(), Path::tokens(), dispatch_rules()) -> {ok, module(), any(), bindings(), HostInfo::undefined | tokens(), PathInfo::undefined | tokens()} | {error, notfound, host} | {error, notfound, path}. match(_Host, _Path, []) -> {error, notfound, host}; match(_Host, Path, [{'_', PathMatchs}|_Tail]) -> match_path(Path, PathMatchs, [], undefined); match(Host, Path, [{HostMatch, PathMatchs}|Tail]) -> case try_match(host, Host, HostMatch) of false -> match(Host, Path, Tail); {true, HostBinds, undefined} -> match_path(Path, PathMatchs, HostBinds, undefined); {true, HostBinds, HostInfo} -> match_path(Path, PathMatchs, HostBinds, lists:reverse(HostInfo)) end.
函数的注释很清楚,本来想尝试翻译,无奈英文不好,就不给大家献丑了,我们看具体逻辑吧,如果有能坚持看到这里的朋友,而且你的英文不错,能翻译,那我在这麻烦你帮忙翻译下,也能帮助后来看这篇文字的朋友,不甚感激,回到代码:
我们根据上下文,能够知道代码将调用第二个分支,也就是执行:
match(_Host, Path, [{'_', PathMatchs}|_Tail]) ->
match_path(Path, PathMatchs, [], undefined);
这里,参数的值分别为:
< _Host = [<<"localhost">>]
< Path = []
< PathMatchs = [{[<<"websocket">>],websocket_handler,[]},
{[<<"eventsource">>],eventsource_handler,[]},
{[<<"eventsource">>,<<"live">>],eventsource_emitter,[]},
{'_',default_handler,[]}]
< _Tail = []
接着调用 cowboy_dispatcher:match_path/4 函数:
-spec match_path(tokens(), dispatch_path(), bindings(), HostInfo::undefined | tokens()) -> {ok, module(), any(), bindings(), HostInfo::undefined | tokens(), PathInfo::undefined | tokens()} | {error, notfound, path}. match_path(_Path, [], _HostBinds, _HostInfo) -> {error, notfound, path}; match_path(_Path, [{'_', Handler, Opts}|_Tail], HostBinds, HostInfo) -> {ok, Handler, Opts, HostBinds, HostInfo, undefined}; match_path('*', [{'*', Handler, Opts}|_Tail], HostBinds, HostInfo) -> {ok, Handler, Opts, HostBinds, HostInfo, undefined}; match_path(Path, [{PathMatch, Handler, Opts}|Tail], HostBinds, HostInfo) -> case try_match(path, Path, PathMatch) of false -> match_path(Path, Tail, HostBinds, HostInfo); {true, PathBinds, PathInfo} -> {ok, Handler, Opts, HostBinds ++ PathBinds, HostInfo, PathInfo} end.
同样,这里根据参数的值,我们也能知道,首先匹配的是最后一个分支,那么我们看下最后一个分支接受到的参数的值:
< Path = []
< PathMatch = [<<"websocket">>]
< Handler = websocket_handler
< Opts = []
< Tail = [{[<<"eventsource">>],eventsource_handler,[]},
{[<<"eventsource">>,<<"live">>],eventsource_emitter,[]},
{'_',default_handler,[]}]
< HostBinds = []
< HostInfo = undefined
而逻辑也比较简单,首先调用cowboy_dispatcher:try_match/3 函数,代码如下:
-spec try_match(host | path, tokens(), match_rule()) -> {true, bindings(), undefined | tokens()} | false. try_match(host, List, Match) -> list_match(lists:reverse(List), lists:reverse(Match), []); try_match(path, List, Match) -> list_match(List, Match, []).
由于 case try_match(path, Path, PathMatch) of 第一个参数传递的是path,所以匹配的是下面这个分支,接受到的参数值为:
< List = []
< Match = [<<"websocket">>]
逻辑也很简单,就调用了 cowboy_dispatcher:list_match/3 函数,代码如下:
-spec list_match(tokens(), match_rule(), bindings()) -> {true, bindings(), undefined | tokens()} | false. %% Atom '...' matches any trailing path, stop right now. list_match(List, ['...'], Binds) -> {true, Binds, List}; %% Atom '_' matches anything, continue. list_match([_E|Tail], ['_'|TailMatch], Binds) -> list_match(Tail, TailMatch, Binds); %% Both values match, continue. list_match([E|Tail], [E|TailMatch], Binds) -> list_match(Tail, TailMatch, Binds); %% Bind E to the variable name V and continue. list_match([E|Tail], [V|TailMatch], Binds) when is_atom(V) -> list_match(Tail, TailMatch, [{V, E}|Binds]); %% Match complete. list_match([], [], Binds) -> {true, Binds, undefined}; %% Values don't match, stop. list_match(_List, _Match, _Binds) -> false.
跟之前的分析方法一样,都是根据参数的值去匹配对应的分支,很简单,这里匹配到最后一个分支,返回 false。
接着回到 cowboy_dispatcher:match_path/4 函数:
match_path(Path, [{PathMatch, Handler, Opts}|Tail], HostBinds, HostInfo) -> case try_match(path, Path, PathMatch) of false -> match_path(Path, Tail, HostBinds, HostInfo); {true, PathBinds, PathInfo} -> {ok, Handler, Opts, HostBinds ++ PathBinds, HostInfo, PathInfo} end.
我们看下这里返回 false,递归调用cowboy_dispatcher:match_path/4,其实就是依次遍历处理:
< PathMatchs = [{[<<"websocket">>],websocket_handler,[]},
{[<<"eventsource">>],eventsource_handler,[]},
{[<<"eventsource">>,<<"live">>],eventsource_emitter,[]},
{'_',default_handler,[]}]
我详细把每次调用cowboy_dispatcher:match_path/4时的参数都列出来,如下:
-----------------------------
< Path = []
< PathMatch = [<<"websocket">>]
< Handler = websocket_handler
< Opts = []
< Tail = [{[<<"eventsource">>],eventsource_handler,[]},
{[<<"eventsource">>,<<"live">>],eventsource_emitter,[]},
{'_',default_handler,[]}]
< HostBinds = []
< HostInfo = undefined
-----------------------------
< Path = []
< PathMatch = [<<"eventsource">>]
< Handler = eventsource_handler
< Opts = []
< Tail = [{[<<"eventsource">>,<<"live">>],eventsource_emitter,[]},
{'_',default_handler,[]}]
< HostBinds = []
< HostInfo = undefined
-----------------------------
< Path = []
< PathMatch = [<<"eventsource">>,<<"live">>]
< Handler = eventsource_emitter
< Opts = []
< Tail = [{'_',default_handler,[]}]
< HostBinds = []
< HostInfo = undefined
-----------------------------
< _Path = []
< Handler = default_handler
< Opts = []
< _Tail = []
< HostBinds = []
< HostInfo = undefined
-----------------------------
不知道大家能不能明白,当然,最后一次,很明显不会匹配cowboy_dispatcher:match_path/4 函数最后一个分支,而是匹配第二个分支,代码如下:
match_path(_Path, [{'_', Handler, Opts}|_Tail], HostBinds, HostInfo) ->
{ok, Handler, Opts, HostBinds, HostInfo, undefined};
这里就一行代码,返回由这几个参数组合成的元组。
接着回到cowboy_http_protocol:dispatch/2 函数实现:
case cowboy_dispatcher:match(Host, Path, Dispatch) of {ok, Handler, Opts, Binds, HostInfo, PathInfo} -> handler_init(Req#http_req{host_info=HostInfo, path_info=PathInfo, bindings=Binds}, State#state{handler={Handler, Opts}}); {error, notfound, host} -> error_terminate(400, State); {error, notfound, path} -> error_terminate(404, State) end.
这里我们已经知道了case cowboy_dispatcher:match(Host, Path, Dispatch) of 这里正确的情况下会返回 {ok, Handler, Opts, Binds, HostInfo, PathInfo},那么函数接下来将调用cowboy_http_protocol:handler_init/2函数。
好了,今天就到这里,下一篇,我们将从cowboy_http_protocol:handler_init/2函数继续往下看。
最后,谢谢大家支持。北京今天下了一天雨,现在还在继续,好反常,不过总算凉快了,大家好梦吧。
本文基于署名-非商业性使用 3.0许可协议发布,欢迎转载,演绎,但是必须保留本文的署名rhinovirus(包含链接http://www.cnblogs.com/rhinovirus/),且不得用于商业目的。如您有任何疑问或者授权方面的协商,请与我联系。