dubbo/dubbox 增加原生thrift及avro支持
(facebook) thrift / (hadoop) avro / (google) probuf(grpc)是近几年来比较抢眼的高效序列化/rpc框架,dubbo框架虽然有thrift的支持,但是依赖的版本较早,只支持0.8.0,而且还对协议做一些扩展,并非原生的thrift协议。
github上虽然也有朋友对dubbo做了扩展支持原生thrift,但是代码实在太多了,只需要一个类即可:
Thrift2Protocal.java:
package com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.thrift2; import com.alibaba.dubbo.common.URL; import com.alibaba.dubbo.common.logger.Logger; import com.alibaba.dubbo.common.logger.LoggerFactory; import com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.RpcException; import com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.AbstractProxyProtocol; import org.apache.thrift.TProcessor; import org.apache.thrift.protocol.TCompactProtocol; import org.apache.thrift.protocol.TProtocol; import org.apache.thrift.server.TNonblockingServer; import org.apache.thrift.server.TServer; import org.apache.thrift.transport.TFramedTransport; import org.apache.thrift.transport.TNonblockingServerSocket; import org.apache.thrift.transport.TSocket; import org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransport; import java.lang.reflect.Constructor; /** * 为dubbo-rpc添加"原生thrift"支持 * by 杨俊明(http://yjmyzz.cnblogs.com/) */ public class Thrift2Protocol extends AbstractProxyProtocol { public static final int DEFAULT_PORT = 33208; private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Thrift2Protocol.class); public int getDefaultPort() { return DEFAULT_PORT; } @Override protected <T> Runnable doExport(T impl, Class<T> type, URL url) throws RpcException { logger.info("impl => " + impl.getClass()); logger.info("type => " + type.getName()); logger.info("url => " + url); TProcessor tprocessor; TNonblockingServer.Args tArgs = null; String iFace = "$Iface"; String processor = "$Processor"; String typeName = type.getName(); TNonblockingServerSocket transport; if (typeName.endsWith(iFace)) { String processorClsName = typeName.substring(0, typeName.indexOf(iFace)) + processor; try { Class<?> clazz = Class.forName(processorClsName); Constructor constructor = clazz.getConstructor(type); try { tprocessor = (TProcessor) constructor.newInstance(impl); transport = new TNonblockingServerSocket(url.getPort()); tArgs = new TNonblockingServer.Args(transport); tArgs.processor(tprocessor); tArgs.transportFactory(new TFramedTransport.Factory()); tArgs.protocolFactory(new TCompactProtocol.Factory()); } catch (Exception e) { logger.error(e.getMessage(), e); throw new RpcException("Fail to create thrift server(" + url + ") : " + e.getMessage(), e); } } catch (Exception e) { logger.error(e.getMessage(), e); throw new RpcException("Fail to create thrift server(" + url + ") : " + e.getMessage(), e); } } if (tArgs == null) { logger.error("Fail to create thrift server(" + url + ") due to null args"); throw new RpcException("Fail to create thrift server(" + url + ") due to null args"); } final TServer thriftServer = new TNonblockingServer(tArgs); new Thread(new Runnable() { public void run() { logger.info("Start Thrift Server"); thriftServer.serve(); logger.info("Thrift server started."); } }).start(); return new Runnable() { public void run() { try { logger.info("Close Thrift Server"); thriftServer.stop(); } catch (Throwable e) { logger.warn(e.getMessage(), e); } } }; } @Override protected <T> T doRefer(Class<T> type, URL url) throws RpcException { logger.info("type => " + type.getName()); logger.info("url => " + url); try { TSocket tSocket; TTransport transport; TProtocol protocol; T thriftClient = null; String iFace = "$Iface"; String client = "$Client"; String typeName = type.getName(); if (typeName.endsWith(iFace)) { String clientClsName = typeName.substring(0, typeName.indexOf(iFace)) + client; Class<?> clazz = Class.forName(clientClsName); Constructor constructor = clazz.getConstructor(TProtocol.class); try { tSocket = new TSocket(url.getHost(), url.getPort()); transport = new TFramedTransport(tSocket); protocol = new TCompactProtocol(transport); thriftClient = (T) constructor.newInstance(protocol); transport.open(); logger.info("thrift client opened for service(" + url + ")"); } catch (Exception e) { logger.error(e.getMessage(), e); throw new RpcException("Fail to create remoting client:" + e.getMessage(), e); } } return thriftClient; } catch (Exception e) { logger.error(e.getMessage(), e); throw new RpcException("Fail to create remoting client for service(" + url + "): " + e.getMessage(), e); } } }
重写父类AbstractProxyProtocol的二个抽象方法doExport及doRefer即可,doExport用于对外暴露RPC服务,在这个方法里启动thrift server,dubbo service provider在启动时会调用该方法。而doRefer用于dubbo service consumer发现服务后,获取对应的rpc-client。
参考这个思路,avro也很容易集成进来:
AvroProtocol.java
package com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.avro; import com.alibaba.dubbo.common.URL; import com.alibaba.dubbo.common.logger.Logger; import com.alibaba.dubbo.common.logger.LoggerFactory; import com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.RpcException; import com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.AbstractProxyProtocol; import org.apache.avro.ipc.NettyServer; import org.apache.avro.ipc.NettyTransceiver; import org.apache.avro.ipc.Server; import org.apache.avro.ipc.reflect.ReflectRequestor; import org.apache.avro.ipc.reflect.ReflectResponder; import java.net.InetSocketAddress; /** * 为dubbo-rpc添加avro支持 * by 杨俊明(http://yjmyzz.cnblogs.com/) */ public class AvroProtocol extends AbstractProxyProtocol { public static final int DEFAULT_PORT = 40881; private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(AvroProtocol.class); public int getDefaultPort() { return DEFAULT_PORT; } @Override protected <T> Runnable doExport(T impl, Class<T> type, URL url) throws RpcException { logger.info("impl => " + impl.getClass()); logger.info("type => " + type.getName()); logger.info("url => " + url); final Server server = new NettyServer(new ReflectResponder(type, impl), new InetSocketAddress(url.getHost(), url.getPort())); server.start(); return new Runnable() { public void run() { try { logger.info("Close Avro Server"); server.close(); } catch (Throwable e) { logger.warn(e.getMessage(), e); } } }; } @Override protected <T> T doRefer(Class<T> type, URL url) throws RpcException { logger.info("type => " + type.getName()); logger.info("url => " + url); try { NettyTransceiver client = new NettyTransceiver(new InetSocketAddress(url.getHost(), url.getPort())); T ref = ReflectRequestor.getClient(type, client); logger.info("Create Avro Client"); return ref; } catch (Exception e) { logger.error(e.getMessage(), e); throw new RpcException("Fail to create remoting client for service(" + url + "): " + e.getMessage(), e); } } }
不要忘记在META-INF/dubbo/internal下添加名为com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.Protocal的文件,内容为:
avro=com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.protocol.avro.AvroProtocol
接下来谈谈如何打包到dubbo的jar里:
dubbo-rpc/pom.xml里,把二个新增的项目加进来:
<modules> ... <module>dubbo-rpc-avro</module> ... <module>dubbo-rpc-thrift2</module> ... </modules>
然后dubbo/pom.xml里:
<artifactSet> <includes> ... <include>com.alibaba:dubbo-rpc-api</include> <include>com.alibaba:dubbo-rpc-avro</include> ... <include>com.alibaba:dubbo-rpc-thrift2</include> ... </includes> </artifactSet>
dependencies节也要增加:
<dependency> <groupId>com.alibaba</groupId> <artifactId>dubbo-rpc-thrift2</artifactId> <version>${project.parent.version}</version> <exclusions> <exclusion> <groupId>org.apache.thrift</groupId> <artifactId>libthrift</artifactId> </exclusion> </exclusions> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>com.alibaba</groupId> <artifactId>dubbo-rpc-avro</artifactId> <version>${project.parent.version}</version> <exclusions> <exclusion> <groupId>org.apache.avro</groupId> <artifactId>avro</artifactId> </exclusion> <exclusion> <groupId>org.apache.avro</groupId> <artifactId>avro-ipc</artifactId> </exclusion> </exclusions> </dependency>
这样打包出来的dubbo-xxx.jar里,就包括新增的Protocol。至于google的protobuf,目前处于3.x -beta阶段,等以后出正式版了,再看情况整合起来。
以上代码已经提交到github:https://github.com/yjmyzz/dubbox (版本号:2.8.4a)
thrift/avro协议的使用示例见:https://github.com/yjmyzz/dubbox-sample
最后,对dubbo/thrift/avro/rest这4种协议,做了下简单的对比测试,测试用例很简单:
public String ping() { return "pong"; }
客户端调用ping方法,服务器返回字符串"pong",在mac book pro上做5万次调用,结果如下:
dubbo RPC testing => 50000次RPC调用(dubbo协议),共耗时14778毫秒,平均3383.407715/秒 avro RPC testing => 50000次RPC调用(avro协议),共耗时10707毫秒,平均4669.842285/秒 thrift RPC testing => 50000次RPC调用(thrift协议),共耗时4667毫秒,平均10713.520508/秒 REST testing => 50000次REST调用,共耗时112699毫秒,平均443.659668/秒
这跟预期一致,REST走http协议,自然最慢,avro与dubbo底层的网络通讯都是借助netty实现,在同一个数量级,但是avro的二进制序列化效率更高,所以略快,而thrift则是从里到外,全都是facebook自己实现的,性能最优,完胜其它协议。
个人建议:对于一个服务接口,对外同时提供thrift、REST二种形式的服务实现,内部子系统之间用thrift方式调用(因为thrift跨语言,其实从外部进来的调用,也可以用thrift-rpc方式),一些不方便直接用thrift-client调用的场景,仍然走传统的REST.
出处:http://yjmyzz.cnblogs.com
本文版权归作者和博客园共有,欢迎转载,但未经作者同意必须保留此段声明,且在文章页面明显位置给出原文连接,否则保留追究法律责任的权利。