[译文] 应用领域驱动设计, 第三章 - 规范模式
原文: Applied Domain-Driven Design (DDD), Part 3 - Specification Pattern
Specification pattern is great, David Fancher wrote a great piece on it, i suggest you read it before you continue.
规范模式十分强大, David Fancher 了一篇非常好的关于规范模式的文章, 我建议你在阅读本文之前去读一下那篇文章.
In short, specification pattern allows you to chain business queries.
简而言之, 规范模式就是允许你可以链式业务查询.
示例 (Example)
ISpecification<Customer> spec =
new CustomerRegisteredInTheLastDays(30).And(new CustomerPurchasedNumOfProducts(2));
此系列上文的实体 (Entity from previous posts in this series)
public class Customer : IDomainEntity
{
private List<Purchase> purchases = new List<Purchase>();
public Guid Id { get; protected set; }
public string FirstName { get; protected set; }
public string LastName { get; protected set; }
public string Email { get; protected set; }
public string Password { get; protected set; }
public DateTime Created { get; protected set; }
public bool Active { get; protected set; }
public ReadOnlyCollection<Purchase> Purchases { get { return this.purchases.AsReadOnly(); } }
public static Customer Create(string firstname, string lastname, string email)
{
Customer customer = new Customer()
{
FirstName = firstname,
LastName = lastname,
Email = email,
Active = true,
Created = DateTime.Today
};
DomainEvents.Raise<CustomerCreated>(new CustomerCreated() { Customer = customer });
return customer;
}
public Purchase Checkout(Cart cart)
{
Purchase purchase = Purchase.Create(this, cart.Products);
this.purchases.Add(purchase);
DomainEvents.Raise<CustomerCheckedOut>(new CustomerCheckedOut() { Purchase = purchase });
return purchase;
}
}
规范示例 (Specification Examples)
public class CustomerRegisteredInTheLastDays : SpecificationBase<Customer>
{
readonly int nDays;
public CustomerRegisteredInTheLastDays(int nDays)
{
this.nDays = nDays;
}
public override Expression<Func<Customer,bool>> SpecExpression
{
get
{
return customer => customer.Created >= DateTime.Today.AddDays(-nDays)
&& customer.Active;
}
}
}
public class CustomerPurchasedNumOfProducts : SpecificationBase<Customer>
{
readonly int nPurchases;
public CustomerPurchasedNumOfProducts(int nPurchases)
{
this.nPurchases = nPurchases;
}
public override Expression<Func<Customer,bool>> SpecExpression
{
get
{
return customer => customer.Purchases.Count == this.nPurchases
&& customer.Active;
}
}
}
抽象仓储查询示例 (Abstract Repository Query Example)
IRepository<Customer> customerRepository = new Repository<Customer>();
ISpecification<Customer> spec =
new CustomerRegisteredInTheLastDays(30).And(new CustomerPurchasedNumOfProducts(2));
IEnumerable<Customer> customers = customerRepository.Find(spec);
抽象仓储示例 (Abstract Repository Example)
public interface IRepository<TEntity>
where TEntity : IDomainEntity
{
TEntity FindById(Guid id);
TEntity FindOne(ISpecification<TEntity> spec);
IEnumerable<TEntity> Find(ISpecification<TEntity> spec);
void Add(TEntity entity);
void Remove(TEntity entity);
}
总结 (Summary)
- Specification allows you to query data in a abstract way i.e. you can query memory collections or an RDBMS. This ensures persistence/infrastructure ignorance.
- 规范允许你以一种抽象的方式查询数据, 也就是说, 你可以查询内存集合或者查询关系型数据库. 规范确保了持久层 / 基础设施的未知.
- Specification encapsulates a business rule in one spec.
- 规范将业务规则封装在一个规范中.
- Specification pattern allows you to chain your business rules up.
- 规范模式允许你可以把业务规则链接起来.
- Specification makes your domain layer DRY i.e. you don't need to write same LINQ all over again.
- 规范使你的领域层干燥, 也就是你不需要再写同样的 LINQ 语句了.
- Specifications are easy to unit test.
- 规范让单元测试更加容易.
- Specifications are stored in the domain layer, this provides full visibility.
- 规范存储在领域层, 这提供了完整的可见性.
- Specifications are super elegant.
- 规范十分优雅. (让你写的代码特别讲究)
建议 (Tips)
- Break complex business logic rules down in your specification as NHibernate might struggle to interpret them in to a SQL query. This is a generally good tip as you don't want messy SQL hitting your database.
- 在你的规范模式中, 需要分解复杂的业务逻辑规则, 因为类似于 NHibernate 之类的 ORM 框架可能难以将其解释为 SQL 查询. 这通常是比较好建议, 因为你不希望将凌乱的 SQL 语句发送到数据库.
- Query data around the entity properties, don't try and change the properties on the entity i.e. instead of writing customer.Created.AddDays(30) >= DateTime.Today write customer.Created >= DateTime.Today.AddDays(-30). The former will try and compile it as a SQL and will fail as it's too complex, the latter will convert the value to a parameter.
- 查询实体属性的书是, 不要尝试修改实体的属性, 也就是说用
customer.Created >= DateTime.Today.AddDays(-30)
代替customer.Created.AddDays(30) >= DateTime.Today
. 后者可能因为太复杂导致尝试编译为 SQL 语句而失败, 前者则会把值转化为参数.
- As specifications are logical queries they should not change state of the caller or the calling objects. i.e. don't call state changing methods, such as customer.Checkout(....) && customer.Active == true. This tip goes hand in hand with the tip above.
- 由于规范是逻辑查询, 因此他们不应该修改调用者或调用对象的状态. 比如, 不要调用类似于这种
customer.Checkout(....) && customer.Active == true
修改状态的方法. 这个建议与上面的建议是相辅相成的.
一些有用的链接 (Useful links)
- 规范, 表达式树, 以及 NHibernate 一篇很好的文章, 其中包含了有关如何在 NHibernate 中使用规范的出色示例.
- 规范模式, 布尔规范模式的基础说明.
*Note: Code in this article is not production ready and is used for prototyping purposes only. If you have suggestions or feedback please do comment.
*注意: 本文中的代码尚未准备好投入生产, 仅用于原型设计. 如果有建议和反馈, 请发表评论.