[译文] 应用领域驱动设计, 第三章 - 规范模式

原文: Applied Domain-Driven Design (DDD), Part 3 - Specification Pattern

Specification pattern is great, David Fancher wrote a great piece on it, i suggest you read it before you continue.

规范模式十分强大, David Fancher 了一篇非常好的关于规范模式的文章, 我建议你在阅读本文之前去读一下那篇文章.

In short, specification pattern allows you to chain business queries.

简而言之, 规范模式就是允许你可以链式业务查询.

示例 (Example)#

Copy
ISpecification<Customer> spec = new CustomerRegisteredInTheLastDays(30).And(new CustomerPurchasedNumOfProducts(2));

此系列上文的实体 (Entity from previous posts in this series)#

Copy
public class Customer : IDomainEntity { private List<Purchase> purchases = new List<Purchase>(); public Guid Id { get; protected set; } public string FirstName { get; protected set; } public string LastName { get; protected set; } public string Email { get; protected set; } public string Password { get; protected set; } public DateTime Created { get; protected set; } public bool Active { get; protected set; } public ReadOnlyCollection<Purchase> Purchases { get { return this.purchases.AsReadOnly(); } } public static Customer Create(string firstname, string lastname, string email) { Customer customer = new Customer() { FirstName = firstname, LastName = lastname, Email = email, Active = true, Created = DateTime.Today }; DomainEvents.Raise<CustomerCreated>(new CustomerCreated() { Customer = customer }); return customer; } public Purchase Checkout(Cart cart) { Purchase purchase = Purchase.Create(this, cart.Products); this.purchases.Add(purchase); DomainEvents.Raise<CustomerCheckedOut>(new CustomerCheckedOut() { Purchase = purchase }); return purchase; } }

规范示例 (Specification Examples)#

Copy
public class CustomerRegisteredInTheLastDays : SpecificationBase<Customer> { readonly int nDays; public CustomerRegisteredInTheLastDays(int nDays) { this.nDays = nDays; } public override Expression<Func<Customer,bool>> SpecExpression { get { return customer => customer.Created >= DateTime.Today.AddDays(-nDays) && customer.Active; } } } public class CustomerPurchasedNumOfProducts : SpecificationBase<Customer> { readonly int nPurchases; public CustomerPurchasedNumOfProducts(int nPurchases) { this.nPurchases = nPurchases; } public override Expression<Func<Customer,bool>> SpecExpression { get { return customer => customer.Purchases.Count == this.nPurchases && customer.Active; } } }

抽象仓储查询示例 (Abstract Repository Query Example)#

Copy
IRepository<Customer> customerRepository = new Repository<Customer>(); ISpecification<Customer> spec = new CustomerRegisteredInTheLastDays(30).And(new CustomerPurchasedNumOfProducts(2)); IEnumerable<Customer> customers = customerRepository.Find(spec);

抽象仓储示例 (Abstract Repository Example)#

Copy
public interface IRepository<TEntity> where TEntity : IDomainEntity { TEntity FindById(Guid id); TEntity FindOne(ISpecification<TEntity> spec); IEnumerable<TEntity> Find(ISpecification<TEntity> spec); void Add(TEntity entity); void Remove(TEntity entity); }

总结 (Summary)#

  • Specification allows you to query data in a abstract way i.e. you can query memory collections or an RDBMS. This ensures persistence/infrastructure ignorance.
  • 规范允许你以一种抽象的方式查询数据, 也就是说, 你可以查询内存集合或者查询关系型数据库. 规范确保了持久层 / 基础设施的未知.
  • Specification encapsulates a business rule in one spec.
  • 规范将业务规则封装在一个规范中.
  • Specification pattern allows you to chain your business rules up.
  • 规范模式允许你可以把业务规则链接起来.
  • Specification makes your domain layer DRY i.e. you don't need to write same LINQ all over again.
  • 规范使你的领域层干燥, 也就是你不需要再写同样的 LINQ 语句了.
  • Specifications are easy to unit test.
  • 规范让单元测试更加容易.
  • Specifications are stored in the domain layer, this provides full visibility.
  • 规范存储在领域层, 这提供了完整的可见性.
  • Specifications are super elegant.
  • 规范十分优雅. (让你写的代码特别讲究)

建议 (Tips)#

  • Break complex business logic rules down in your specification as NHibernate might struggle to interpret them in to a SQL query. This is a generally good tip as you don't want messy SQL hitting your database.
  • 在你的规范模式中, 需要分解复杂的业务逻辑规则, 因为类似于 NHibernate 之类的 ORM 框架可能难以将其解释为 SQL 查询. 这通常是比较好建议, 因为你不希望将凌乱的 SQL 语句发送到数据库.
  • Query data around the entity properties, don't try and change the properties on the entity i.e. instead of writing customer.Created.AddDays(30) >= DateTime.Today write customer.Created >= DateTime.Today.AddDays(-30). The former will try and compile it as a SQL and will fail as it's too complex, the latter will convert the value to a parameter.
  • 查询实体属性的书是, 不要尝试修改实体的属性, 也就是说用 customer.Created >= DateTime.Today.AddDays(-30) 代替 customer.Created.AddDays(30) >= DateTime.Today. 后者可能因为太复杂导致尝试编译为 SQL 语句而失败, 前者则会把值转化为参数.
  • As specifications are logical queries they should not change state of the caller or the calling objects. i.e. don't call state changing methods, such as customer.Checkout(....) && customer.Active == true. This tip goes hand in hand with the tip above.
  • 由于规范是逻辑查询, 因此他们不应该修改调用者或调用对象的状态. 比如, 不要调用类似于这种 customer.Checkout(....) && customer.Active == true 修改状态的方法. 这个建议与上面的建议是相辅相成的.

一些有用的链接 (Useful links)#

*Note: Code in this article is not production ready and is used for prototyping purposes only. If you have suggestions or feedback please do comment.

*注意: 本文中的代码尚未准备好投入生产, 仅用于原型设计. 如果有建议和反馈, 请发表评论.

posted @   芯芊  阅读(423)  评论(0编辑  收藏  举报
编辑推荐:
· 10年+ .NET Coder 心语,封装的思维:从隐藏、稳定开始理解其本质意义
· .NET Core 中如何实现缓存的预热?
· 从 HTTP 原因短语缺失研究 HTTP/2 和 HTTP/3 的设计差异
· AI与.NET技术实操系列:向量存储与相似性搜索在 .NET 中的实现
· 基于Microsoft.Extensions.AI核心库实现RAG应用
阅读排行:
· 10年+ .NET Coder 心语 ── 封装的思维:从隐藏、稳定开始理解其本质意义
· 地球OL攻略 —— 某应届生求职总结
· 提示词工程——AI应用必不可少的技术
· Open-Sora 2.0 重磅开源!
· 周边上新:园子的第一款马克杯温暖上架
点击右上角即可分享
微信分享提示
CONTENTS