不同类型文件“可读写”的含义

• For sockets, readability means there is some unread data in the receivebuffer. That is well-known and probably the most common use case for non-blocking I/O. Conversely, writeability implies the send buffer is not full from the standpoint of the underlying protocol of the socket (e.g. TCP/IP). Ultimately, protocol-specific congestion control determines the exact mechanisms and policies for the send buffer.
• For pipes, readability means some unread data remains in the pipe buffer, or one task is blocking in a write to the other end of the pipe. Reciprocally, writeability means the pipe buffer has available room, or one task is blocking in a read operation on the pipe.
• FIFOs are really exactly like pipes, except that they have a name in the file system hierarchy.
• Terminals and pseudo-terminals also work much like pipes, with regards to I/O, except for the fact that they support duplex operations like sockets.
• For devices (other than terminals), polling is implementation-defined. You need to check the device driver documentation.
• For directories, reading is only defined through blocking (synchronous) function calls, notably readdir() or readdir_r(). As such polling is not defined by the specifications and it would be of no use even if it were. Also writing to directories is not allowed at all.
• Regular files are always readable and they are also always writeable. This is clearly stated in the relevant POSIX specifications. I cannot stress this enough. Putting a regular file in non-blocking has ABSOLUTELY no effectsother than changing one bit in the file flags.

 

Reading from a regular file might take a long time. For instance, if it is located on a busy disk, the I/O scheduler might take so much time that the user will notice that the application is frozen.

Nevertheless, non-blocking mode will not fix it. It will simply not work. Checking a file for readability or writeability always succeeds immediately. If the system needs time to perform the I/O operation, it will put the task in non-interruptible sleep from the read or write system call. In other words, if you can assume that a file descriptor refers to a regular file, do not waste your time (or worse, other people's time) in implementing non-blocking I/O.

The only safe way to read data from or write data to a regular file while not blocking a task... consists of not performing the operation - not in that particular task anyway. Concretely, you need to create a separate thread (or process), or use asynchronous I/O (functions whose name starts with aio_). Whether you like it or not, and even if you think multiple threads suck, there are no other options.

 

from (http://www.remlab.net/op/nonblock.shtml)