做sql优化的前提瞧见是sql等价
1.MAX MIN写法的分与合
drop table t purge;
create table t as select * from dba_objects;
alter table t add constraint pk1_object_id primary key (OBJECT_ID);
set autotrace on
set linesize 1000
select min(object_id),max(object_id) from t;
和这个分开写有差别吗
select max(object_id) from t;
select min(object_id) from t;
其实这两种方式不等价,
等价的语句是
select max, min
from (select max(object_id) max from t ) a,(select min(object_id) min from t) b;
2.In与 ><写法之间的异同
drop table t purge;
create table t as select * from dba_objects;
create index idx_object_id on t(object_id,object_type);
UPDATE t SET OBJECT_ID=20 WHERE ROWNUM<=26000;
UPDATE t SET OBJECT_ID=21 WHERE OBJECT_ID<>20;
COMMIT;
set linesize 266
set pagesize 1
alter session set statistics_level=all ;
select /*+index(t,idx_object_id)*/ * from t where object_TYPE='TABLE' AND OBJECT_ID >= 20 AND OBJECT_ID<= 21;
select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null,null,'allstats last'));
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | | 2925 |00:00:00.03 | 1103 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 1 | 2126 | 2925 |00:00:00.03 | 1103 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_OBJECT_ID | 1 | 320 | 2925 |00:00:00.02 | 730 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
select /*+index(t,idx_object_id)*/ * from t t where object_TYPE='TABLE' AND OBJECT_ID IN (20,21);
select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null,null,'allstats last'));
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 1 | INLIST ITERATOR | | 1 | | 2920 |00:00:00.01 | 563 |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| t | 2 | 2592 | 2920 |00:00:00.01 | 563 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX1_OBJECT_ID | 2 | 1 | 2920 |00:00:00.01 | 214 |
-----------------------------------------------------
3.count(*)与count(列)不等价
4.看似不想等，实则相等
begin
select count(*) into v_cnt from t1 ;
if v_cnt>0
then …A逻辑….
else
then …B逻辑…..
End;
我来翻译一下这段需求：
获取t1 表的记录数，判断是否大于0，如果大于0走A逻辑，否则就走B逻辑。
因此代码就如上所示来实现了。真正的需求是这样吗？
其实应该是这样的：只要T1表有记录就走A逻辑，否则走B逻辑。
两者有区别吗？其实区别还是很大的，前者可是强调获取记录数，我们是不是一定要遍历整个表得出一个记录数才知道是否大于0？
真正需求的理解可以让我们这样实现，只要从T1表中成功获取到第一条记录，就可以停止检索了，表示该表有记录了，难道事实不是这样？
因此原先的SQL1 从Select count(*) from t1; 被改造为：
Select count(*) from t1 where rownum=1;
begin
select count(*) into v_cnt from t1 where rownum=1;
if v_cnt=1
then …A逻辑….
else
then …B逻辑…..
End;
5.从需求优化
版权声明：本文为博主原创文章，未经博主允许不得转载。
