随笔 - 229  文章 - 2  评论 - 511  阅读 - 84万

SQL Server does not purge row versioning records even the transaction are committed if there are other open transaction running in the databases with read-committed snapshot enabled .

This is a by-design behavior. There is only one allocation unit in tempdb that is
tracking the versioned records across the server. Cleanup of this allocation
unit is decided by the oldest transaction of READ_COMMITTED_SNAPSHOT enabled
database.  SQL Server won’t remove row
versioning records of all databases greater than the oldest transaction until
it commits or rollback.

 

Here is an example

Database db1 and db2 have read_committed_snapshot enabled.

1)session 1

use db1

begin tran

select *From table1DB1

 

2)session 2

use db2

update table1DB2 set c1=c1+1

 

Then the SQL Server does not remove the row versioning records of session 2 until session 1 transaction commit rollback.

 

Then we start an new transaction

3)Session 3

use db1

begin tran

select * from table2DB1

 

4)Session 4

use db2

update table1DB2 set c1=c1+1

 

 

if Session 1 is commit right now.

The row versioning records of session 2 will be removed by SQL Server.

However,The row versioning records of session 4 will not be removed by SQL Server, because transaction in session 3 is still there.

posted on   stswordman  阅读(172)  评论(0编辑  收藏  举报
编辑推荐:
· AI与.NET技术实操系列:基于图像分类模型对图像进行分类
· go语言实现终端里的倒计时
· 如何编写易于单元测试的代码
· 10年+ .NET Coder 心语,封装的思维:从隐藏、稳定开始理解其本质意义
· .NET Core 中如何实现缓存的预热?
阅读排行:
· 分享一个免费、快速、无限量使用的满血 DeepSeek R1 模型,支持深度思考和联网搜索!
· 25岁的心里话
· 基于 Docker 搭建 FRP 内网穿透开源项目(很简单哒)
· ollama系列01:轻松3步本地部署deepseek,普通电脑可用
· 按钮权限的设计及实现
< 2025年3月 >
23 24 25 26 27 28 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 1 2 3 4 5

点击右上角即可分享
微信分享提示