SQL Tuning Advisor(STA) 到底做了什么?
SQL Tuing Advisor(STA) 是Automatic Tuning Optimizer(自动优化调整器)的一部分。在前面的文章使用SQL tuning advisor(STA)自动优化SQL中描述了SQL Tuing Advisor(STA)的相关背景并给出示例。本文主要是描述STA底层到底为我们作了什么使得SQL语句得以优化,同时演示绑定变量的情形下接受sql profile后,后续SQL是否采纳对应的sql profile的执行计划的情形。最后给出了awr中的SQL通过STA tuning的脚本。
1、使用STA优化library cache中的SQL
--演示环境 hr@CNMMBO> select * from v$version where rownum<2; BANNER ---------------------------------------------------------------- Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production --下面直接根据sql_id优化library cache中的SQL语句 hr@CNMMBO> @tune_cache_sql Enter value for input_sql_id: 8rnmr2dpnjvk8 Enter value for input_task_name: hr_query RECS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION SECTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tuning Task Name : hr_query Tuning Task Owner : HR Scope : COMPREHENSIVE Time Limit(seconds) : 1800 Completion Status : COMPLETED Started at : 06/07/2013 11:40:27 Completed at : 06/07/2013 11:40:28 Number of SQL Profile Findings : 1 Number of SQL Restructure Findings: 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Schema Name: HR SQL ID : 8rnmr2dpnjvk8 SQL Text : SELECT /*+ ORDERED */ * FROM employees e, locations l, departments d WHERE e.department_id = d.department_id AND l.location_id = d.location_id AND e.employee_id < :bnd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FINDINGS SECTION (2 findings) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- SQL Profile Finding (see explain plans section below) -------------------------------------------------------- A potentially better execution plan was found for this statement. Recommendation (estimated benefit: 90.74%) ------------------------------------------ - Consider accepting the recommended SQL profile. execute dbms_sqltune.accept_sql_profile(task_name => 'hr_query', replace => TRUE); 2- Restructure SQL finding (see plan 1 in explain plans section) ---------------------------------------------------------------- An expensive cartesian product operation was found at line ID 3 of the execution plan. Recommendation -------------- - Consider removing the "ORDERED" hint. Rationale --------- The "ORDERED" hint might force the optimizer to generate a cartesian product. A cartesian product should be avoided whenever possible because it is an expensive operation and might produce a large amount of data. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXPLAIN PLANS SECTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- Original With Adjusted Cost ------------------------------ Plan hash value: 3871948714 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 85 | 11645 | 103 (1)| 00:00:02 | |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 85 | 11645 | 103 (1)| 00:00:02 | | 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DEPARTMENTS | 27 | 540 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 3 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 1973 | 225K| 99 (0)| 00:00:02 | | 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EMPLOYEES | 86 | 5848 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | EMP_EMP_ID_PK | 86 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 6 | BUFFER SORT | | 23 | 1127 | 96 (0)| 00:00:02 | | 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | LOCATIONS | 23 | 1127 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - access("E"."DEPARTMENT_ID"="D"."DEPARTMENT_ID" AND "L"."LOCATION_ID"="D"."LOCATION_ID") 5 - access("E"."EMPLOYEE_ID"<:BND) 2- Using SQL Profile -------------------- Plan hash value: 2153960720 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 85 | 11645 | 10 (20)| 00:00:01 | |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 85 | 11645 | 10 (20)| 00:00:01 | | 2 | MERGE JOIN | | 27 | 1863 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 | | 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEPARTMENTS | 27 | 540 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 4 | INDEX FULL SCAN | DEPT_LOCATION_IX | 27 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 5 | SORT JOIN | | 23 | 1127 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 | | 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | LOCATIONS | 23 | 1127 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | EMPLOYEES | 86 | 5848 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | EMP_EMP_ID_PK | 86 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - access("E"."DEPARTMENT_ID"="D"."DEPARTMENT_ID") 5 - access("L"."LOCATION_ID"="D"."LOCATION_ID") filter("L"."LOCATION_ID"="D"."LOCATION_ID") 8 - access("E"."EMPLOYEE_ID"<:BND) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->上面的advisor report中得到了两个findings,一个是建议我们接受profile,一个建议我们移出ordered hint,因为它导致了笛卡尔集
2、根据优化建议接受SQL profile
-->根据上面的advisor,接下来我们accept这个profile,唯一不同的增加了一个名字,如果不指定名字,系统会自动生成一个 hr@CNMMBO> execute dbms_sqltune.accept_sql_profile(task_name => 'hr_query',replace=> TRUE,name=>'hr_profile'); PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. --所有生成的SQL profile的相关信息都存放在数据字典dba_sql_profiles中 hr@CNMMBO> select name,category,signature,sql_text,created,type,status,force_matching from dba_sql_profiles; NAME CATEGORY SIGNATURE SQL_TEXT CREATED TYPE STATUS FOR ------------ ---------- -------------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------- --------- -------- --- hr_profile DEFAULT 8856746596263812636 SELECT /*+ ORDERED */ 20130607 14:27:33 MANUAL ENABLED NO * FROM employees e, locations l, de partments d WHERE e.department_id = d.departme nt_id AND l.location_id = d.locatio n_id AND e.employee_id < :bnd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --下面是dba_sql_profiles数据字典中的列几个重要的说明 a、CATEGORY: Category of the SQL profile -- 用于对SQL Profile实施分类管理,指明了当前的SQL profile属于哪一个分类,缺省情况下dafault类会被激活 -- 可以在接受SQL profile时指定分类,具体参考包dbms_sqltune.accept_sql_profile -- 初始化参数sqltune_category用于控制系统和会话级别的category被激活,也就是说单个session仅仅支持单一的category激活 -- 如下查看当前设定的category及如何修改 -->查看系统的sqltune_category参数 hr@CNMMBO> show parameter sqltune NAME TYPE VALUE ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------ sqltune_category string DEFAULT -->通过下面的方式来修改缺省的catagory类别 alter session | system sqltune_category = category_name; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- b、SIGNATURE: Unique identifier generated from normalized SQL text -- 用于控制标准化SQL文本的到唯一签名ID并将该ID的profile的信息存储到数据字典 -- 在category激活以及profile被启用的情形下,后续的SQL语句运行时如果得到的签名ID与存储到数据字典的ID相同,则SQL profile被使用 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- c、TYPE: Type of the SQL profile (how it was created):MANUAL AUTO-TUNE -- 该列表明对应的sql profile是自动还是手动产生的 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- d、STATUS: Status of the SQL profile: ENABLED DISABLED VOID -- 该列表明对于sql profile是否处于启用状态 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e、FORCE_MATCHING -- If TRUE this causes SQL Profiles to target all SQL statements which have the same text after normalizing all literal values to bind variables. -- (Note that if a combination of literal values and bind variables is used in the same SQL text, no transformation occurs). -- This is analogous to the matching algorithm use by the FORCE option of the CURSOR_SHARING parameter. -- If FALSE, literals are not transformed. -- This is analogous to the matching algorithm used by the EXACT option of the CURSOR_SHARING parameter. --FORCE_MATCHING描述了SQL文本是模糊匹配还是精确匹配 --为true时等同于CURSOR_SHARING参数的force,不区分空格,大小写及字面量。如果字面量与绑定变量混合则产生不同的签名ID --为false时等同于CURSOR_SHARING参数的exact,不区分空格和大小写 --CURSOR_SHARING参数设置影响解析,字面量产生硬解析,绑定变量产生软解析(library cache中对应的sql存在时,可以参考Oracle硬解析与软解析 --字面量与绑定变量 select * from scott.emp where ename='SCOTT'; --SCOTT即是字面量 select * from scott.emp where ename=:b1; --b1即是绑定变量 --上面的查询结果为no,也就是说此时使用的是缺省值false. --前面我们完成tuning后生成的report中提到了建议接受一个profile以及remove提示ordered --那我们看看接受sql profile之后Oracle到底干了什么 --从下面的查询可知,sql profile告诉优化器忽略该SQL语句中的提示,这就是他做的事情 hr@CNMMBO> SELECT attr_val 2 FROM sys.sqlprof$ p, sys.sqlprof$attr a 3 WHERE p.sp_name = 'hr_profile' AND p.signature = a.signature AND p.category = a.category; ATTR_VAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IGNORE_OPTIM_EMBEDDED_HINTS
3、测试接受SQL profile后的情形
--对于OLTP的情形,大部分SQL语句使用了绑定变量,下面来测试一下绑定变量是否影响sql profile的运用 --以及测试SQL语句在使用大小写,添加或移除空格的情形时sql profile是否被使用到 hr@CNMMBO> variable bnd number; --定义绑定变量并赋值 hr@CNMMBO> exec :bnd:=166 PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. hr@CNMMBO> set autot trace exp; hr@CNMMBO> SELECT /*+ ORDERED */ 2 * 3 FROM employees e, locations l, departments d 4 WHERE e.department_id = d.department_id AND l.location_id = 5 d.location_id AND e.employee_id < :bnd; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 685643925 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 685 | 9 (23)| 00:00:01 | |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 5 | 685 | 9 (23)| 00:00:01 | | 2 | MERGE JOIN | | 5 | 440 | 5 (20)| 00:00:01 | | 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DEPARTMENTS | 27 | 540 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 4 | INDEX FULL SCAN | DEPT_ID_PK | 27 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 5 | SORT JOIN | | 5 | 340 | 3 (34)| 00:00:01 | | 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EMPLOYEES | 5 | 340 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | EMP_EMP_ID_PK | 2 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | LOCATIONS | 23 | 1127 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - access("L"."LOCATION_ID"="D"."LOCATION_ID") 5 - access("E"."DEPARTMENT_ID"="D"."DEPARTMENT_ID") filter("E"."DEPARTMENT_ID"="D"."DEPARTMENT_ID") 7 - access("E"."EMPLOYEE_ID"<TO_NUMBER(:BND)) Note ----- - SQL profile "hr_profile" used for this statement --->这个提示表明sql profile已经被使用 --下面我们给绑定变量重新赋值,以及使用小写来替换原来的SQL语句,并且移除一些空格,看看profile是否依旧会被使用 hr@CNMMBO> exec :bnd:=133; PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. hr@CNMMBO> select /*+ ORDERED */ * from employees e, locations l, departments d 2 where e.department_id = d.department_id AND l.location_id = d.location_id 3 and e.employee_id < :bnd; Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 685643925 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 685 | 9 (23)| 00:00:01 | |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 5 | 685 | 9 (23)| 00:00:01 | | 2 | MERGE JOIN | | 5 | 440 | 5 (20)| 00:00:01 | | 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DEPARTMENTS | 27 | 540 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 4 | INDEX FULL SCAN | DEPT_ID_PK | 27 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 5 | SORT JOIN | | 5 | 340 | 3 (34)| 00:00:01 | | 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EMPLOYEES | 5 | 340 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | EMP_EMP_ID_PK | 2 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | LOCATIONS | 23 | 1127 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - access("L"."LOCATION_ID"="D"."LOCATION_ID") 5 - access("E"."DEPARTMENT_ID"="D"."DEPARTMENT_ID") filter("E"."DEPARTMENT_ID"="D"."DEPARTMENT_ID") 7 - access("E"."EMPLOYEE_ID"<TO_NUMBER(:BND)) Note ----- - SQL profile "hr_profile" used for this statement --->这个提示表明sql profile已经被使用 --从上面的测试可知,大小写差异,空格多少以及绑定变量对上面的SQL语句并没有影响,之前的profile依旧有效
4、对比优化前后的I/O 开销
a、先测试优化后的I/O cost hr@CNMMBO> set autot trace stat; hr@CNMMBO> select /*+ ORDERED */ * from employees e, locations l, departments d 2 where e.department_id = d.department_id AND l.location_id = d.location_id 3 and e.employee_id < :bnd; 33 rows selected. Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 recursive calls 0 db block gets 14 consistent gets 10 physical reads 0 redo size 5362 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 514 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 33 rows processed --上面的Statistics表明优化后的consistent gets为14,physical reads为10 --将sql profile disable,则该profile不会生效 hr@CNMMBO> set autot off; hr@CNMMBO> BEGIN 2 DBMS_SQLTUNE.alter_sql_profile (name => 'hr_profile', attribute_name => 'STATUS', VALUE => 'DISABLED'); 3 END; 4 / PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. --Author : Robinson --Blog : http://blog.csdn.net/robinson_0612 -->查看disable后的状态 hr@CNMMBO> select name,status from dba_sql_profiles where name='hr_profile'; NAME STATUS ------------------------------ -------- hr_profile DISABLED hr@CNMMBO> print bnd; BND ---------- 133 --下面来查看disable后的统计信息,SQL语句会回到优化之前 hr@CNMMBO> set autot trace stat; hr@CNMMBO> select /*+ ORDERED */ * from employees e, locations l, departments d 2 where e.department_id = d.department_id AND l.location_id = d.location_id 3 and e.employee_id < :bnd; 33 rows selected. Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------- 9 recursive calls 0 db block gets 27 consistent gets 5 physical reads 0 redo size 5403 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 514 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 33 rows processed --从上面的统计信息可知,SQL优化之前的consistent gets为27,大于优化之后的consistent gets --注,此处未对比physical reads,一般情形下我们考虑的是consistent gets,如果需要两个都对比,应每次执行SQL前flush buffer cache -->接下来可以移除sql profile hr@CNMMBO> set autot off; hr@CNMMBO> exec dbms_sqltune.drop_sql_profile('hr_profile'); PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
5、使用STA优化awr中SQL的脚本
robin@SZDB:~/dba_scripts/custom/sql> more tune_awr_sql.sql SET ECHO OFF TERMOUT ON FEEDBACK OFF VERIFY OFF SET SCAN ON PAGESIZE 9999 SET LONG 1000000 LINESIZE 180 COL recs FORMAT a145 --Author : Robinson --Blog : http://blog.csdn.net/robinson_0612 VARIABLE tuning_task VARCHAR2(30) DECLARE l_sql_id v$session.prev_sql_id%TYPE:='&input_sql_id'; BEGIN :tuning_task := dbms_sqltune.create_tuning_task(sql_id => l_sql_id, begin_snap=>&input_begin_snap, end_snap=>&input_end_snap, task_name=>'&input_task_name'); dbms_sqltune.execute_tuning_task(:tuning_task); END; / SELECT dbms_sqltune.report_tuning_task(:tuning_task) as recs FROM dual; SET VERIFY ON FEEDBACK ON
6、小结
a、SQL优化器在tuning模式下不会对原始SQL语句文本做任何修改。
b、对于使用STA优化的SQL语句,SQL优化器会转换优化器的模式或移除添加hint(如本例是忽略hint)以实现优化。
c、SQL profile会纠正查询优化器对基数的错误评估。
d、对于统计信息缺失或过时或根本不存在统计信息的情形,SQL优化器会给出建议以获取真实的统计信息。
e、SQL profile能够被导入导出。导出之前,该profile必须先被accept。
f、SQL profile所依赖的对象被删除后,SQL profile并不会被删除。但如果使用drop user username cascade时是例外。
更多参考
PL/SQL 联合数组与嵌套表
PL/SQL 变长数组
PL/SQL --> PL/SQL记录
dbms_xplan之display_cursor函数的使用