The complete explanation is that 1.0.x and 1.1.x do not have the same naming conventions for the generated libraries. OpenSSL 1.1.x has moved into what they call the “unified build system” and changed themselves the names of the libraries. This was done on purpose, mainly because these libraries are not binary compatible and should not be intermixed into projects or dlls deployed to replace 1.0.x with 1.1.x, and vice versa. So while previously in 1.0.x there were libeay32 and ssleay32, they are in 1.1.x named libssl and libcrypto(在1.0.x之前的版本中,文件为libeay32.dll和ssleay32.dll,在1.1.x之后的版本中,名字是libssl.dll和libcrypto.dll). That’s what happened upstream in OpenSSL. Read here also: https://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=147223063610803&w=2 and there are tons of other discussions online you can tap to.
Beyond that, I also manipulate the suffixes in my builds. Namely, I append the MD[d] and MT[d] suffixes, so that it can be clearer when someone uses a library. This may not be very important when using DLLs, but with static builds chaos ensues if you mix them. So I made my own patches to produce these suffixes to the libraries.
I think that’s a complete answer now. I have also a suggestion for you:
You can download my build scripts if you still like to change the names of the library files in a different way and look at the patch, and modify it accordingly.
You can also skip the application of the patch and then you will get exactly the filenaming conventions of OpenSSL upstream in different builds.
I hope this helps.
使用
VS工程导入DLL(或静态库)确认好编译的版本,x86,x64
1. [c/c++]->[Additional Library Directories] add include header
【推荐】国内首个AI IDE,深度理解中文开发场景,立即下载体验Trae
【推荐】编程新体验,更懂你的AI,立即体验豆包MarsCode编程助手
【推荐】抖音旗下AI助手豆包,你的智能百科全书,全免费不限次数
【推荐】轻量又高性能的 SSH 工具 IShell:AI 加持,快人一步
· Manus重磅发布:全球首款通用AI代理技术深度解析与实战指南
· 被坑几百块钱后,我竟然真的恢复了删除的微信聊天记录!
· 没有Manus邀请码?试试免邀请码的MGX或者开源的OpenManus吧
· 园子的第一款AI主题卫衣上架——"HELLO! HOW CAN I ASSIST YOU TODAY
· 【自荐】一款简洁、开源的在线白板工具 Drawnix