NGAC vs RBAC vs ABAC 及为何选择 NGAC 作为权限控制模型

NGAC RBAC ABAC - 国内版 Bing
https://cn.bing.com/search?FORM=U227DF&PC=U227&q=NGAC+RBAC+ABAC

low joker - 知乎
https://www.zhihu.com/people/lowlowlow-9

NGAC vs RBAC vs ABAC 及为何选择 NGAC 作为权限控制模型 - 知乎
https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/352007836

empowerid-whitepaper-rbac-abac-hybrid-model.pdf
https://blog.empowerid.com/hs-fs/hub/174819/file-18506087-pdf/docs/empowerid-whitepaper-rbac-abac-hybrid-model.pdf

Poorly Implemented RBAC
RBAC’s greatest weakness is that it is almost universally oversimplified in its implementation by
application developers. The RBAC model defines the concept of a Subject, a Role, and a
Permission much the same as ABAC’s Subject, Resource, and Action. In the RBAC model, a
Permission is the combination of an “Action” for a “Resource” in ABAC terminology (e.g.,
CustomerA.delete). However, most implementations of RBAC, as written by application developers,
limit themselves to simple checks for role membership without any concept of permission. This
usage downgrades roles into being simply groups to maintain collections of users with the central
role management system unaware of the permissions they grant in the applications themselves.
The pseudocode below is an example of this simplistic “IsInRole” approach:
This oversimplification is so widespread that it has become synonymous with RBAC and even
promoted as a standard practice by many vendors. In this model, application permissions are
enforced solely internal to the application and hidden from the role management system. This
internal enforcement makes it impossible to manage or audit the actual access being granted by

if (user.IsInRole(StandardEmployee)
this.application.show(Employee.PublicProfile)
else if (user.IsInRole(“HRManager”) || (user.IsInRole(“SalesManager”) ||
(user.IsInRole(“AuditManager”)
this.application.show(Employee.PublicProfile + Employee.AbsenceReport)

Unpacking Next Generation Access Control (NGAC) and Tetrate Q | Tetrate
https://www.tetrate.io/blog/unpacking-next-generation-access-control-ngac-and-tetrate-q/

NGAC vs RBAC vs ABAC 及为何选择 NGAC 作为权限控制模型 - 常给自己加个油 - 博客园
https://www.cnblogs.com/zywnnblog/p/14821217.html

Guide to Attribute Based Access Control (ABAC) Definition and Considerations | NIST
https://www.nist.gov/publications/guide-attribute-based-access-control-abac-definition-and-considerations-1

posted @   任国强  阅读(471)  评论(0编辑  收藏  举报
编辑推荐:
· SQL Server 2025 AI相关能力初探
· Linux系列:如何用 C#调用 C方法造成内存泄露
· AI与.NET技术实操系列(二):开始使用ML.NET
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 探究高空视频全景AR技术的实现原理
阅读排行:
· 阿里最新开源QwQ-32B,效果媲美deepseek-r1满血版,部署成本又又又降低了!
· Manus重磅发布:全球首款通用AI代理技术深度解析与实战指南
· 开源Multi-agent AI智能体框架aevatar.ai,欢迎大家贡献代码
· 被坑几百块钱后,我竟然真的恢复了删除的微信聊天记录!
· AI技术革命,工作效率10个最佳AI工具
历史上的今天:
2018-06-01 Spring Boot, Java Config - No mapping found for HTTP request with URI [/…] in DispatcherServlet with name 'dispatcherServlet'
点击右上角即可分享
微信分享提示