Level: Introductory
Doron Rosenberg (doronr@us.ibm.com), Staff Software Engineer, IBM
26 Jul 2005
Ever have trouble getting your Internet Explorer-specific Web applications to work with Mozilla? This article covers common issues associated with migrating applications to the open source Mozilla-based browser. You'll first learn basic cross-browser development techniques, and then develop strategies for overcoming the differences between Mozilla and Internet Explorer.
When Netscape started the Mozilla browser, it made the conscious decision to support W3C standards. As a result, Mozilla is not fully backwards-compatible with Netscape Navigator 4.x and Microsoft Internet Explorer legacy code; for example, Mozilla does not support <layer> as I will discuss later. Browsers, like Internet Explorer 4, that were built before the conception of W3C standards inherited many quirks. In this article, I will describe Mozilla's quirks mode, which provides strong backwards HTML compatibility with Internet Explorer and other legacy browsers.
I'll also cover nonstandard technologies, such as XMLHttpRequest and rich text editing, that Mozilla does support because no W3C equivalent existed at the time. They include:
General cross-browser coding tips
Even though Web standards do exist, different browsers behave differently (in fact, the same browser may behave differently depending on the platform). Many browsers, such as Internet Explorer, also support pre-W3C APIs and have never added extensive support for the W3C-compliant ones.
Before I go into the differences between Mozilla and Internet Explorer, I'll cover some basic ways you can make a Web application extensible in order to add new browser support later.
Since different browsers sometimes use different APIs for the same functionality, you can often find multiple if() else() blocks throughout the code to differentiate between the browsers. The following code shows blocks designated for Internet Explorer:
. . .
var elm;
if (ns4)
elm = document.layers["myID"];
else if (ie4)
elm = document.all["myID"];
|
The above code isn't extensible, so if you want it to support a new browser, you must update these blocks throughout the Web application.
The easiest way to eliminate the need to recode for a new browser is to abstract out functionality. Rather than multiple if() else() blocks, you increase efficiency by taking common tasks and abstracting them out into their own functions. Not only does this make the code easier to read, it simplifies adding support for new clients:
var elm = getElmById("myID");
function getElmById(aID){
var element = null;
if (isMozilla || isIE5)
element = document.getElementById(aID)
else if (isNetscape4)
element = document.layers[aID]
else if (isIE4)
element = document.all[aID];
return element;
}
|
The above code still has the issue of browser sniffing, or detecting which browser the user is using. Browser sniffing is usually done through the useragent, such as:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031016
|
While using the useragent to sniff the browser provides detailed information on the browser in use, code that handles useragents can make mistakes when new browser versions arrive, thus requiring code changes.
If the type of browser doesn't matter (suppose that you have already blocked nonsupported browsers from accessing the Web application), it is better to sniff by browser capability. You can usually do this by testing the required functionality in JavaScript. For example, rather than:
You would use:
if (document.getElementById)
|
This would allow other browsers that support that method, such as Opera or Safari, to work without any changes.
Useragent sniffing, however, makes sense when accuracy is important, such as when you're verifying that a browser meets the Web application's version requirements or you are trying to work around a bug.
JavaScript also allows inline conditional statements, which can help with code readability:
var foo = (condition) ? conditionIsTrue : conditionIsFalse;
|
For example, to retrieve an element, you would use:
function getElement(aID){
return (document.getElementById) ? document.getElementById(aID)
: document.all[aID];
}
|
Differences between Mozilla and Internet Explorer
First, I'll discuss the differences in the way HTML behaves between Mozilla and Internet Explorer.
Tooltips
Legacy browsers introduced tooltips into HTML by showing them on links and using the value of the alt attribute as a tooltip's content. The latest W3C HTML specification created the title attribute, which is meant to contain a detailed description of the link. Modern browsers will use the title attribute to display tooltips, and Mozilla only supports showing tooltips for that attribute and not the alt attribute.
Entities
HTML markup can contain several entities, which the W3 standards body has defined. You can reference entities through their numerical or character reference. For example, you can reference the white space character #160 with   or with its equivalent character reference .
Some older browsers, such as Internet Explorer, had such quirks as allowing you to use entities by replacing the ; (semi-colon) character at the end with regular text content:
Mozilla will render the above   as white spaces, even though that is against the W3C specification. The browser will not parse a   if it is directly followed by more characters, for example:
This code does not work in Mozilla, since it is against the W3 standard. Always use the correct form ( ) to avoid browser discrepancies.
DOM differences
The Document Object Model (DOM) is the tree structure that contains the document elements. You can manipulate it through JavaScript APIs, which the W3C has standardized. However, prior to W3C standardization, Netscape 4 and Internet Explorer 4 implemented the APIs similarly. Mozilla only implements legacy APIs if they are unachievable with W3C standards.
Access elements
To retrieve an element reference following the cross-browser approach, you use document.getElementById(aID) , which works in Internet Explorer 5.5+, Mozilla, and is part of the DOM Level 1 specification.
Mozilla does not support accessing an element through document.elementName or even through the element's name, which Internet Explorer does (also called global namespace polluting). Mozilla also does not support the Netscape 4 document.layers method and Internet Explorer's document.all . While document.getElementById lets you retrieve one element, you can also use document.layers and document.all to obtain a list of all document elements with a certain tag name, such as all <div> elements.
The W3C DOM Level 1 method gets references to all elements with the same tag name through getElementsByTagName() . The method returns an array in JavaScript, and can be called on the document element or other nodes to search only their subtree. To get an array of all elements in the DOM tree, you can use getElementsByTagName(*) .
The DOM Level 1 methods, as shown in Table 1, are commonly used to move an element to a certain position and toggle its visibility (menus, animations). Netscape 4 used the <layer> tag, which Mozilla does not support, as an HTML element that can be positioned anywhere. In Mozilla, you can position any element using the <div> tag, which Internet Explorer uses as well and which you'll find in the HTML specification.
Table 1. Methods used to access elements
Method |
Description |
document.getElementById( aId ) |
Returns a reference to the element with the specified ID. |
document.getElementsByTagName( aTagName ) |
Returns an array of elements with the specified name in the document. |
Traverse the DOM
Mozilla supports the W3C DOM APIs for traversing the DOM tree through JavaScript (see Table 2). The APIs exist for each node in the document and allow walking the tree in any direction. Internet Explorer supports these APIs as well, but it also supports its legacy APIs for walking a DOM tree, such as the children property.
Table 2. Methods used to traverse the DOM
Property/Method |
Description |
childNodes |
Returns an array of all child nodes of the element. |
firstChild |
Returns the first child node of the element. |
getAttribute( aAttributeName ) |
Returns the value for the specified attribute. |
hasAttribute( aAttributeName ) |
Returns a boolean stating if the current node has an attribute defined with the specified name. |
hasChildNodes() |
Returns a boolean stating whether the current node has any child nodes. |
lastChild |
Returns the last child node of the element. |
nextSibling |
Returns the node immediately following the current one. |
nodeName |
Returns the name of the current node as a string. |
nodeType |
Returns the type of the current node.
Value |
Description |
1 |
Element Node |
2 |
Attribute Node |
3 |
Text Node |
4 |
CDATA Section Node |
5 |
Entity Reference Node |
6 |
Entity Node |
7 |
Processing Instruction Node |
8 |
Comment Node |
9 |
Document Node |
10 |
Document Type Node |
11 |
Document Fragment Node |
12 |
Notation Node | |
nodeValue |
Returns the value of the current node. For nodes that contain text, such as text and comment nodes, it will return their string value. For attribute nodes, the attribute value is returned. For all other nodes, null is returned. |
ownerDocument |
Returns the document object containing the current node. |
parentNode |
Returns the parent node of the current node. |
previousSibling |
Returns the node immediately preceding the current one. |
removeAttribute( aName ) |
Removes the specified attribute from the current node. |
setAttribute( aName, aValue ) |
Sets the value of the specified attribute with the specified value. |
Internet Explorer has a nonstandard quirk, where many of these APIs will skip white space text nodes that are generated, for example, by new line characters. Mozilla will not skip these, so sometimes you need to distinguish these nodes. Every node has a nodeType property specifying the node type. For example, an element node has type 1, while a text node has type 3 and a comment node is type 8. The best way to only process element nodes is to iterate over all child nodes and only process those with a nodeType of 1:
HTML:
<div id="foo">
<span>Test</span>
c </div>
JavaScript:
var myDiv = document.getElementById("foo");
var myChildren = myXMLDoc.childNodes;
for (var i = 0; i < myChildren.length; i++) {
if (myChildren[i].nodeType == 1){
// element node
}
}
|
Generate and manipulate content
Mozilla supports the legacy methods for adding content into the DOM dynamically, such as document.write , document.open and document.close . Mozilla also supports Internet Explorer's InnerHTML method, which it can call on almost any node. It does not, however, support OuterHTML (which adds markup around an element, and has no standard equivalent) and innerText (which sets the text value of the node, and which you can achieve in Mozilla by using textContent ).
Internet Explorer has several content manipulation methods that are nonstandard and unsupported in Mozilla, including retrieving the value; inserting text; and inserting elements adjacent to a node, such as getAdjacentElement and insertAdjacentHTML . Table 3 shows how the W3C standard and Mozilla manipulate content, all of which are methods of any DOM node.
Table 3. Methods Mozilla uses to manipulate content
Method |
Description |
appendChild( aNode ) |
Creates a new child node. Returns a reference to the new child node. |
cloneNode( aDeep ) |
Makes a copy of the node it is called on and returns the copy. If aDeep is true, it copies over the node's entire subtree. |
createElement( aTagName ) |
Creates and returns a new and parentless DOM node of the type specified by aTagName. |
createTextNode( aTextValue ) |
Creates and returns a new and parentless DOM textnode with the data value specified by aTextValue. |
insertBefore( aNewNode, aChildNode ) |
Inserts aNewNode before aChildNode, which must be a child of the current node. |
removeChild( aChildNode ) |
Removes aChildNode and returns a reference to it. |
replaceChild( aNewNode, aChildNode ) |
Replaces aChildNode with aNewNode and returns a reference to the removed node. |
Document fragments
For performance reasons, you can create documents in memory, rather than working on the existing document's DOM. DOM Level 1 Core introduced document fragments, which are lightweight documents that contain a subset of a normal document's interfaces. For example, getElementById does not exist, but appendChild does. You can also easily add document fragments to existing documents.
Mozilla creates document fragments through document.createDocumentFragment() , which returns an empty document fragment.
Internet Explorer's implementation of document fragments, however, does not comply with the W3C standard and simply returns a regular document.
JavaScript differences
Most differences between Mozilla and Internet Explorer are usually blamed on JavaScript. However, the issues usually lie in the APIs that a browser exposes to JavaScript, such as the DOM hooks. The two browsers possess few core JavaScript differences; issues encountered are often timing related.
JavaScript date differences
The only Date difference is the getYear method. Per the ECMAScript specification (which is the specification JavaScript follows), the method is not Y2k-compliant, and running new Date().getYear() in 2004 will return "104". Per the ECMAScript specification, getYear returns the year minus 1900, originally meant to return "98" for 1998. getYear was deprecated in ECMAScript Version 3 and replaced with getFullYear() . Internet Explorer changed getYear() to work like getFullYear() and make it Y2k-compliant, while Mozilla kept the standard behavior.
JavaScript execution differences
Different browsers execute JavaScript differently. For example, the following code assumes that the div node already exists in the DOM by the time the script block executes:
...
<div id="foo">Loading...</div>
<script>
document.getElementById("foo").innerHTML = "Done.";
</script>
|
However, this is not guaranteed. To be sure that all elements exist, you should use the onload event handler on the <body> tag:
<body onload="doFinish()">
<div id="foo">Loading...</div>
<script>
function doFinish() {
var element = document.getElementById("foo");
element.innerHTML = "Done.";
}
</script>
...
|
Such timing-related issues are also hardware-related -- slower systems can reveal bugs that faster systems hide. One concrete example is window.open , which opens a new window:
<script>
function doOpenWindow(){
var myWindow = window.open("about:blank");
myWindow.location.href = "http://www.ibm.com";
}
</script>
|
The problem with the code is that window.open is asynchronous -- it does not block the JavaScript execution until the window has finished loading. Therefore, you may execute the line after the window.open line before the new window has finished. You can deal with this by having an onload handler in the new window and then call back into the opener window (using window.opener ).
Differences in JavaScript-generating HTML
JavaScript can, through document.write , generate HTML on the fly from a string. The main issue here is when JavaScript, embedded inside an HTML document (thus, inside an <script> tag), generates HTML that contains a <script> tag. If the document is in strict rendering mode, it will parse the </script> inside the string as the closing tag for the enclosing <script> . The following code illustrates this best:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
...
<script>
document.write("<script>alert("Hello")</script>")
</script>
|
Since the page is in strict mode, Mozilla's parser will see the first <script> and parse until it finds a closing tag for it, which would be the first </script> . This is because the parser has no knowledge about JavaScript (or any other language) when in strict mode. In quirks mode, the parser is aware of JavaScript when parsing (which slows it down). Internet Explorer is always in quirks mode, as it does not support true XHTML. To make this work in strict mode in Mozilla, separate the string into two parts:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
...
<script>
document.write("<script>alert("Hello")</" + "script>")
</script>
|
Debug JavaScript
Mozilla provides several ways to debug JavaScript-related issues found in applications created for Internet Explorer. The first tool is the built-in JavaScript console, shown in Figure 1, where errors and warnings are logged. You can access it in Mozilla by going to Tools -> Web Development -> JavaScript Console, or in Firefox (the standalone browser product from Mozilla) at Tools -> JavaScript Console. Figure 1. JavaScript console
The JavaScript console can show the full log list or just errors, warnings, and messages. The error message in Figure 1 says that at aol.com, line 95 tries to access an undefined variable called is_ns70. Clicking on the link will open Mozilla's internal view source window with the offending line highlighted.
The console also allows you to evaluate JavaScript. To evaluate the entered JavaScript syntax, type in 1+1 into the input field and press Evaluate, as Figure 2 shows. Figure 2. JavaScript console evaluating
Mozilla's JavaScript engine has built-in support for debugging, and thus can provide powerful tools for JavaScript developers. Venkman, shown in Figure 3, is a powerful, cross-platform JavaScript debugger that integrates with Mozilla. It is usually bundled with Mozilla releases; you can find it at Tools -> Web Development -> JavaScript Debugger. For Firefox, the debugger isn't bundled; instead, you can download and install it from http://www.mozilla.org/projects/venkman/. You can also find tutorials at the development page, located at http://www.hacksrus.com/~ginda/venkman/. Figure 3. Mozilla's JavaScript debugger
The JavaScript debugger can debug JavaScript running in the Mozilla browser window. It supports such standard debugging features as breakpoint management, call stack inspection, and variable/object inspection. All features are accessible through the user interface or through the debugger's interactive console. With the console, you al can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the same scope as the JavaScript currently being debugged.
CSS differences
Mozilla has the strongest support for Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), including most of CSS1, CSS2, and parts of CSS3, compared to Internet Explorer as well as all other browsers.
For most issues mentioned below, Mozilla will add an error or warning entry into the JavaScript console. Check the JavaScript console if you encounter CSS-related issues.
Mimetypes (when CSS files are not applied)
The most common CSS-related issue is that CSS definitions inside referenced CSS files are not applied. This is usually due to the server sending the wrong mimetype for the CSS file. The CSS specification states that CSS files should be served with the text/css mimetype. Mozilla will respect this and only load CSS files with that mimetype if the Web page is in strict standards mode. Internet Explorer will always load the CSS file, no matter with which mimetype it is served. Web pages are considered in strict standards mode when they start with a strict doctype. To solve this problem, you can make the server send the right mimetype or remove the doctype. I'll discuss more about doctypes in the next section.
CSS and units
Many Web applications do not use units with their CSS, especially when you use JavaScript to set the CSS. Mozilla tolerates this, as long as the page is not rendered in strict mode. Since Internet Explorer doesn't support true XHTML, it does not care if no units are specified. If the page is in strict standards mode, and no units are used, then Mozilla ignores the style:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<body>
// works in strict mode
<div style="width:40px; border:1px solid black;">
Text
</div>
// will fail in strict mode
<div style="width:40; border:1px solid black;">
Text
</div>
</body>
</html>
|
Since the above example has a strict doctype, the page is rendered in strict standards mode. The first div will have a width of 40px, since it uses units, but the second div won't get a width, and thus will default to 100% width. The same would apply if the width were set through JavaScript.
JavaScript and CSS
Since Mozilla supports the CSS standards, it also supports the CSS DOM standard for setting CSS through JavaScript. You can access, remove, and change an element's CSS rules through the element's style member:
<div id="myDiv" border:1px solid black;">
Text
</div>
<script>
var myElm = document.getElementById("myDiv");
myElm.style.width = "40px";
</script>
|
You can reach every CSS attribute that way. Again, if the Web page is in strict mode, you must set a unit or else Mozilla will ignore the command.
When you query a value, say through .style.width , in Mozilla and Internet Explorer, the returned value will contain the unit, meaning a string is returned. You can convert the string into a number through parseFloat("40px") .
CSS overflow differences
CSS added the notion of overflow, which allows you to define how to handle overflow; for example, when the contents of a div with a specified height are taller than that height. The CSS standard defines that if no overflow behavior is set in this case, the div contents will overflow. However, Internet Explorer does not comply with this, and will expand the div beyond its set height in order to hold the contents. Below is an example that shows this difference:
<div style="height:100px; border: 1px solid black;">
<div style="height:150px; border: 1px solid red;
margin:10px;">
a
</div>
</div>
|
As you can see in Figure 4, Mozilla acts like the standard specifies. The standard says that in this case, the inner div overflows to the bottom since the inner content is taller than it's parent. If you prefer the Internet Explorer behavior, simply don't specify a height on the outer element. Figure 4. DIV overflow
hover differences
The nonstandard CSS hover behavior in Internet Explorer occurs on quite a few IBM Web sites. It usually manifests itself by changing text style when hovered over in Mozilla, but not in Internet Explorer. This is because the a:hover CSS selector in Internet Explorer matches <a href="" /> but not <a name="" /> , which sets anchors in HTML. The text changes occur because authors encapsulate the areas with the anchor-setting markup:
CSS:
a:hover {color:green;}
HTML:
<a href="foo.com">This should turn green when you hover over it.</a>
<a name="anchor-name">
This should change color when hovered over, but doesn't
in Internet Explorer.
</a>
|
Mozilla follows the CSS specification correctly and will change the color to green in this example. You can use two ways to make Mozilla behave like Internet Explorer and not change the color of the text when hovered over:
- First, you can change the CSS rule to be
a:link:hover {color:green;} , which will only change the color if the element is a link (has an href attribute).
- Alternatively, you can change the markup and close the opened
<a /> before the start of the text -- the anchor will continue to work this way.
Quirks versus standards mode
Older legacy browsers, such as Internet Explorer 4, rendered with so-called quirks under certain conditions. While Mozilla aims to be a standards-compliant browser, it has three modes that support older Web pages created with these quirky behaviors. The page's content and delivery determine which mode Mozilla will use. Mozilla will list the rendered mode in View -> Page Info (or Ctrl-i). The mode in which a page is located depends on its doctype.
Doctypes (short for document type declarations) look like this: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
The section in blue is called the public identifier, the green part is the system identifier, which is a URI.
Standards mode
Standards mode is the strictest rendering mode -- it will render pages per the W3C HTML and CSS specifications and will not support any quirks. Mozilla uses it for the following conditions:
- If a page is sent with a
text/xml mimetype or any other XML or XHTML mimetype
- For any "DOCTYPE HTML SYSTEM" doctype (for example,
<!DOCTYPE HTML SYSTEM "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"> ), except for the IBM doctype
- For unknown doctypes or doctypes without DTDs
Almost standards mode
Mozilla introduced almost standards mode for one reason: a section in the CSS 2 specification breaks designs based on a precise layout of small images in table cells. Instead of forming one image to the user, each small image ends up with a gap next to it. The old IBM homepage shown in Figure 5 offers an example. Figure 5. Image gap
Almost standards mode behaves almost exactly as standards mode, except when it comes to an image gap issue. The issue occurs often on standards-compliant pages and causes them to display incorrectly.
Mozilla uses almost standards mode for the following conditions:
- For any "loose" doctype (for example,
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"> , <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> )
- For the IBM doctype (
<!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM "http://www.ibm.com/data/dtd/v11/ibmxhtml1-transitional.dtd"> )
You can read more about the image gap issue.
Quirks mode
Currently, the Web is full of invalid HTML markup, as well as markup that only functions due to bugs in browsers. The old Netscape browsers, when they were the market leaders, had bugs. When Internet Explorer arrived, it mimicked those bugs in order to work with the content at that time. As newer browsers came to market, most of these original bugs, usually called quirks, were kept for backwards compatibility. Mozilla supports many of these in its quirks rendering mode. Note that due to these quirks, pages will render slower than if they were fully standards-compliant. Most Web pages are rendered under this mode.
Mozilla uses quirks mode for the following conditions:
- When no doctype is specified
- For doctypes without a system identifier (for example,
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> )
For further reading, check out: List of Quirks and List of Doctypes and What Modes They Cause.
Event differences
Mozilla and Internet Explorer are almost completely different in the area of events. The Mozilla event model follows the W3C and Netscape model. In Internet Explorer, if a function is called from an event, it can access the event object through window.event . Mozilla passes an event object to event handlers. They must specifically pass the object on to the function called through an argument. A cross-browser event handling example follows:
<div onclick="handleEvent(event)">Click me!</div>
<script>
function handleEvent(aEvent){
// if aEvent is null, means the Internet Explorer event model,
// so get window.event.
var myEvent = aEvent ? aEvent : window.event;
}
</script>
|
The properties and functions that the event object exposes are also often named differently between Mozilla and Internet Explorer, as Table 4 shows.
Table 4. Event properties differences between Mozilla and Internet Explorer
Internet Explorer Name |
Mozilla Name |
Description |
altKey |
altKey |
Boolean property that returns whether the alt key was pressed during the event. |
cancelBubble |
stopPropagation() |
Used to stop the event from bubbling farther up the tree. |
clientX |
clientX |
The X coordinate of the event, in relation to the client. |
clientY |
clientY |
The Y coordinate of the event, in relation to the client. |
ctrlKey |
ctrlKey |
Boolean property that returns whether the Ctrl key was pressed during the event. |
fromElement |
relatedTarget |
For mouse events, this is the element from which the mouse moved away. |
keyCode |
keyCode |
For keyboard events, this is a number representing the key that was pressed. It is 0 for mouse events. |
returnValue |
preventDefault() |
Used to prevent the event's default action from occurring. |
screenX |
screenX |
The X coordinate of the event, in relation to the screen. |
screenX |
screenY |
The Y coordinate of the event, in relation to the screen. |
shiftKey |
shiftKey |
Boolean property that returns whether the Shift key was pressed during the event. |
srcElement |
target |
The element to which the event was originally dispatched. |
toElement |
currentTarget |
For mouse events, this is the element to which the mouse moved. |
type |
type |
Returns the name of the event. |
Attach event handlers
Mozilla supports two ways to attach events through JavaScript. The first, supported by all browsers, sets event properties directly on objects. To set a click event handler, a function reference is passed to the object's onclick property:
<div id="myDiv">Click me!</div>
<script>
function handleEvent(aEvent){
// if aEvent is null, means the Internet Explorer event model,
// so get window.event.
var myEvent = aEvent ? aEvent : window.event;
}
function onPageLoad(){
document.getElementById("myDiv").onclick = handleEvent;
}
</script>
|
Mozilla fully supports the W3C standard way of attaching listeners to DOM nodes. You use the addEventListener() and removeEventListener() methods, and have the benefit of being able to set multiple listeners for the same event type. Both methods require three parameters: the event type, a function reference, and a boolean denoting whether the listener should catch events in their capture phase. If the boolean is set to false, it will only catch bubbling events. W3C events have three phases: capturing, at target, and bubbling. Every event object has an eventPhase attribute indicating the phase numerically (0 indexed). Every time you trigger an event, the event starts at the DOM's outermost element, the element at the top of the DOM tree. It then walks the DOM using the most direct route toward the target, which is the capturing phase. When the event reaches the target, the event is in the target phase. After arriving at the target, it walks up the DOM tree back to the outermost node; this is bubbling. Internet Explorer's event model only has the bubbling phase; therefore, setting the third parameter to false results in Internet Explorer-like behavior:
<div id="myDiv">Click me!</div>
<script>
function handleEvent(aEvent) {
// if aEvent is null, it is the Internet Explorer event model,
// so get window.event.
var myEvent = aEvent ? aEvent : window.event;
}
function onPageLoad() {
var element = document.getElementById("myDiv");
element.addEventListener("click", handleEvent, false);
}
</script>
|
One advantage of addEventListener() and removeEventListener() over setting properties is that you can have multiple event listeners for the same event, each calling another function. Thus, to remove an event listener requires all three parameters be the same as the ones you use when adding the listener.
Mozilla does not support Internet Explorer's method of converting <script> tags into event handlers, which extends <script> with for and event attributes (see Table 5). It also does not support the attachEvent and detachEvent methods. Instead, you should use the addEventListener and removeEventListener methods. Internet Explorer does not support the W3C events specification.
Table 5. Event method differences between Mozilla and Internet Explorer
Internet Explorer Method |
Mozilla Method |
Description |
attachEvent(aEventType, aFunctionReference) |
addEventListener(aEventType, aFunctionReference, aUseCapture) |
Adds an event listener to a DOM element. |
detachEvent(aEventType, aFunctionReference) |
removeEventListener(aEventType, aFunctionReference, aUseCapture) |
Removes an event listener to a DOM element. |
Rich text editing
While Mozilla prides itself with being the most W3C standards-compliant browser, it does support nonstandard functionality, such as innerHTML and rich text editing, if no W3C equivalent exists.
Mozilla 1.3 introduced an implementation of Internet Explorer's designMode feature, which turns an HTML document into a rich text editor field. Once turned into the editor, commands can run on the document through the execCommand command. Mozilla does not support Internet Explorer's contentEditable attribute for making any widget editable. You can use an iframe to add a rich text editor.
Rich text differences
Mozilla supports the W3C standard of accessing iframe's document object through IFrameElm.contentDocument , while Internet Explorer requires you to access it through document.frames["name"] and then access the resulting document :
function getIFrameDocument(aID){
var rv = null;
// if contentDocument exists, W3C compliant (Mozilla)
if (document.getElementById(aID).contentDocument){
rv = document.getElementById(aID).contentDocument;
} else {
// IE
rv = document.frames[aID].document;
}
return rv;
}
|
Another difference between Mozilla and Internet Explorer is the HTML that the rich text editor creates. Mozilla defaults to using CSS for the generated markup. However, Mozilla allows you to toggle between HTML and CSS mode using the useCSS execCommand and toggling it between true and false. Internet Explorer always uses HTML markup.
Mozilla (CSS):
<span style="color: blue;">Big Blue</span>
Mozilla (HTML):
<font color="blue">Big Blue</font>
Internet Explorer:
<FONT color="blue">Big Blue</FONT>
|
Below is a list of commands that execCommand in Mozilla supports:
Table 6. Rich text editing commands
Command Name |
Description |
Argument |
bold |
Toggles the selection's bold attribute. |
--- |
createlink |
Generates an HTML link from the selected text. |
The URL to use for the link |
delete |
Deletes the selection. |
--- |
fontname |
Changes the font used in the selected text. |
The font name to use (Arial, for example) |
fontsize |
Changes the font size used in the selected text. |
The font size to use |
fontcolor |
Changes the font color used in the selected text. |
The color to use |
indent |
Indents the block where the caret is. |
--- |
inserthorizontalrule |
Inserts an <hr> element at the cursor's position. |
--- |
insertimage |
Inserts an image at the cursor's position. |
URL of the image to use |
insertorderedlist |
Inserts an ordered list (<ol>) element at the cursor's position. |
--- |
insertunorderedlist |
Inserts an unordered list (<ul>) element at the cursor's position. |
--- |
italic |
Toggles the selection's italicize attribute. |
--- |
justifycenter |
Centers the content at the current line. |
--- |
justifyleft |
Justifies the content at the current line to the left. |
--- |
justifyright |
Justifies the content at the current line to the right. |
--- |
outdent |
Outdents the block where the caret is. |
--- |
redo |
Redoes the previous undo command. |
--- |
removeformat |
Removes all formatting from the selection. |
--- |
selectall |
Selects everything in the rich text editor. |
--- |
strikethrough |
Toggles the strikethrough of the selected text. |
--- |
subscript |
Converts the current selection into subscript. |
--- |
superscript |
Converts the current selection into superscript. |
--- |
underline |
Toggles the underline of the selected text. |
--- |
undo |
Undoes the last executed command. |
--- |
unlink |
Removes all link information from the selection. |
--- |
useCSS |
Toggles the usage of CSS in the generated markup. |
Boolean value |
For more information, visit DevEdge.
XML differences
Mozilla has strong support for XML and XML-related technologies, such as XSLT and Web services. It also supports some nonstandard Internet Explorer extensions, such as XMLHttpRequest.
How to handle XML
As with standard HTML, Mozilla supports the W3C XML DOM specification, which allows you to manipulate almost any aspect of an XML document. Differences between Internet Explorer's XML DOM and Mozilla are usually caused by Internet Explorer's nonstandard behaviors. Probably the most common difference is how they handle white space text nodes. Often when XML generates, it contains white spaces between XML nodes. Internet Explorer, when using XMLNode.childNodes[] , will not contain these white space nodes. In Mozilla, those nodes will be in the array.
XML:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<myXMLdoc xmlns:myns="http://myfoo.com">
<myns:foo>bar</myns:foo>
</myXMLdoc>
JavaScript:
var myXMLDoc = getXMLDocument().documentElement;
alert(myXMLDoc.childNodes.length);
|
The first line of JavaScript loads the XML document and accesses the root element (myXMLDoc ) by retrieving the documentElement . The second line simply alerts the number of child nodes. Per the W3C specification, the white spaces and new lines merge into one text node if they follow each other. For Mozilla, the myXMLdoc node has three children: a text node containing a new line and two spaces; the myns:foo node; and another text node with a new line. Internet Explorer, however, does not abide by this and will return "1" for the above code, namely only the myns:foo node. Therefore, to walk the child nodes and disregard text nodes, you must distinguish such nodes.
As mentioned earlier, every node has a nodeType attribute representing the node type. For example, an element node has type 1, while a document node has type 9. To disregard text nodes, you must check for types 3 (text node) and 8 (comment node).
XML:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<myXMLdoc xmlns:myns="http://myfoo.com">
<myns:foo>bar</myns:foo>
</myXMLdoc>
JavaScript:
var myXMLDoc = getXMLDocument().documentElement;
var myChildren = myXMLDoc.childNodes;
for (var run = 0; run < myChildren.length; run++){
if ( (myChildren[run].nodeType != 3) &&
(myChildren[run].nodeType != 8) ){
// not a text or comment node
}
}
|
XML data islands
Internet Explorer has a nonstandard feature called XML data islands, which allow you to embed XML inside an HTML document using the nonstandard HTML tag <xml> . Mozilla does not support XML data islands and handles them as unknown HTML tags. You can achieve the same functionality using XHTML; however, because Internet Explorer's support for XHTML is weak, this is usually not an option.
One cross-browser solution is to use DOM parsers, which parse a string that contains a serialized XML document and generates the document for the parsed XML. Mozilla uses the DOMParser class, which takes the serialized string and creates an XML document out of it. In Internet Explorer, you can achieve the same functionality using ActiveX. A new Microsoft.XMLDOM generates and has a loadXML method that can take in a string and generate a document from it. The following code shows you how:
IE XML data island:
..
<xml id="xmldataisland">
<foo>bar</foo>
</xml>
Cross-browser solution:
var xmlString = "<xml
id=\"xmldataisland\"><foo>bar</foo></xml>";
var myDocument;
if (document.implementation.createDocument){
// Mozilla, create a new DOMParser
var parser = new DOMParser();
myDocument = parser.parseFromString(xmlString, "text/xml");
} else if (window.ActiveXObject){
// Internet Explorer, create a new XML document using ActiveX
// and use loadXML as a DOM parser.
myDocument = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM")
myDocument.async="false";
myDocument.loadXML(xmlString);
}
|
XML HTTP request
Internet Explorer allows you to send and retrieve XML files using MSXML's XMLHTTP class, which is instantiated through ActiveX using new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.XMLHTTP") or new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP") . Since there is no standard method of doing this, Mozilla provides the same functionality in the global JavaScript XMLHttpRequest object. The object generates asynchronous requests by default.
After instantiating the object using new XMLHttpRequest() , you can use the open method to specify what type of request (GET or POST) you use, which file you load, and if it is asynchronous or not. If the call is asynchronous, then give the onload member a function reference, which is called once the request has completed.
Synchronous request:
var myXMLHTTPRequest = new XMLHttpRequest();
myXMLHTTPRequest.open("GET", "data.xml", false);
myXMLHTTPRequest.send(null);
var myXMLDocument = myXMLHTTPRequest.responseXML;
Asynchronous request:
var myXMLHTTPRequest;
function xmlLoaded() {
var myXMLDocument = myXMLHTTPRequest.responseXML;
}
function loadXML(){
myXMLHTTPRequest = new XMLHttpRequest();
myXMLHTTPRequest.open("GET", "data.xml", true);
myXMLHTTPRequest.onload = xmlLoaded;
myXMLHTTPRequest.send(null);
}
|
Table 7 features a list of available methods and properties for Mozilla's XMLHttpRequest .
Table 7. XMLHttpRequest methods and properties
Name |
Description |
void abort() |
Stops the request if it is still running. |
string getAllResponseHeaders() |
Returns all response headers as one string. |
string getResponseHeader(string headerName) |
Returns the value of the specified header. |
functionRef onerror |
If set, the references function will be called whenever an error occurs during the request. |
functionRef onload |
If set, the references function will be called when the request completes successfully and the response has been received. Use when an asynchronous request is used. |
void open (string HTTP_Method, string URL)
void open (string HTTP_Method, string URL, boolean async, string userName, string password) |
Initializes the request for the specified URL, using either GET or POST as the HTTP method. To send the request, call the send() method after initialization. If async is false, the request is synchronous, else it defaults to asynchronous. Optionally, you can specify a username and password for the given URL needed. |
int readyState |
State of the request. Possible values:
0 |
UNINITIALIZED - open() has not been called yet. |
1 |
LOADING - send() has not been called yet. |
2 |
LOADED - send() has been called, headers and status are available. |
3 |
INTERACTIVE - Downloading, responseText holds the partial data. |
4 |
COMPLETED - Finished with all operations. | |
string responseText |
String containing the response. |
DOMDocument responseXML |
DOM Document containing the response. |
void send(variant body) |
Initiates the request. If body is defined, it issent as the body of the POST request. body can be an XML document or a string serialized XML document. |
void setRequestHeader (string headerName, string headerValue) |
Sets an HTTP request header for use in the HTTP request. Has to be called after open() is called. |
string status |
The status code of the HTTP response. |
XSLT differences
Mozilla supports XSL Transformations (XSLT) 1.0. It also allows JavaScript to perform XSLT transformations and allows running XPATH on a document.
Mozilla requires that you send the XML and XSLT file holding the stylesheet with an XML mimetype (text/xml or application/xml ). This is the most common reason why XSLT won't run in Mozilla but will in Internet Explorer. Mozilla is strict in that way.
Internet Explorer 5.0 and 5.5 supported XSLT's working draft, which is substantially different than the final 1.0 recommendation. The easiest way to distinguish what version an XSLT file was written against is to look at the namespace. The namespace for the 1.0 recommendation is http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform , while the working draft's namespace is http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl . Internet Explorer 6 supports the working draft for backwards compatibility, but Mozilla does not support the working draft, only the final recommendation.
If XSLT requires you to distinguish the browser, you can query the "xsl:vendor" system property. Mozilla's XSLT engine will report itself as "Transformiix" and Internet Explorer will return "Microsoft."
<xsl:if test="system-property('xsl:vendor') = 'Transformiix'">
<!-- Mozilla specific markup -->
</xsl:if>
<xsl:if test="system-property('xsl:vendor') = 'Microsoft'">
<!-- Internet Explorer specific markup -->
</xsl:if>
|
Mozilla also provides JavaScript interfaces for XSLT, allowing a Web site to complete XSLT transformations in memory. You can do this using the global XSLTProcessor JavaScript object. XSLTProcessor requires you to load the XML and XSLT files, because it needs their DOM documents. The XSLT document, imported by the XSLTProcessor , allows you to manipulate XSLT parameters. XSLTProcessor can generate a standalone document using transformToDocument() , or it can create a document fragment using transformToFragment() , which you can easily append into another DOM document. Below is an example:
var xslStylesheet;
var xsltProcessor = new XSLTProcessor();
// load the xslt file, example1.xsl
var myXMLHTTPRequest = new XMLHttpRequest();
myXMLHTTPRequest.open("GET", "example1.xsl", false);
myXMLHTTPRequest.send(null);
// get the XML document and import it
xslStylesheet = myXMLHTTPRequest.responseXML;
xsltProcessor.importStylesheet(xslStylesheet);
// load the xml file, example1.xml
myXMLHTTPRequest = new XMLHttpRequest();
myXMLHTTPRequest.open("GET", "example1.xml", false);
myXMLHTTPRequest.send(null);
var xmlSource = myXMLHTTPRequest.responseXML;
var resultDocument = xsltProcessor.transformToDocument(xmlSource);
|
After creating an XSLTProcessor , you load the XSLT file using XMLHttpRequest . The XMLHttpRequest's responseXML member contains the XML document of the XSLT file, which is passed to importStylesheet . You then use the XMLHttpRequest again to load the source XML document that must be transformed; that document is then passed to the transformToDocument method of XSLTProcessor . Table 8 features a list of XSLTProcessor methods.
Table 8. XSLTProcessor methods
Method |
Description |
void importStylesheet(Node styleSheet) |
Imports the XSLT stylesheet. The styleSheet argument is the root node of an XSLT stylesheet's DOM document. |
DocumentFragment transformToFragment(Node source, Document owner) |
Transforms the Node source by applying the stylesheet imported using the importStylesheet method and generates a DocumentFragment. owner specifies what DOM document the DocumentFragment should belong to, making it appendable to that DOM document. |
Document transformToDocument(Node source) |
Transforms the Node source by applying the stylesheet imported using the importStylesheet method and returns a standalone DOM document. |
void setParameter(String namespaceURI, String localName, Variant value) |
Sets a parameter in the imported XSLT stylesheet. |
Variant getParameter(String namespaceURI, String localName) |
Gets the value of a parameter in the imported XSLT stylesheet. |
void removeParameter(String namespaceURI, String localName) |
Removes all set parameters from the imported XSLT stylesheet and makes them default to the XSLT-defined defaults. |
void clearParameters() |
Removes all set parameters and sets them to defaults specified in the XSLT stylesheet. |
void reset() |
Removes all parameters and stylesheets. |
|
Summary
This article covered common issues web application developers face when they try to get their applications to work in Mozilla-based browsers. When you develop web applications, always consider possible browser differences and be informed about them. In Resources, you'll find two good references that provide in-depth coverage on cross-browser development. Following those guidelines not only allow your web applications to work in other browsers, but also on other platforms.
Resources
About the author
|
|
Doron Rosenberg worked previously for Netscape before joining the Browser Development Center at IBM. He has been involved in the Mozilla project for over five years. You can contact Doron at doronr@us.ibm.com. | |