hdu2767 Proving Equivalences Tarjan缩点
Time Limit: 4000/2000 MS (Java/Others) Memory Limit: 32768/32768 K (Java/Others)
Total Submission(s): 4343 Accepted Submission(s): 1541
Problem Description
Consider the following exercise, found in a generic linear algebra textbook.
Let A be an n × n matrix. Prove that the following statements are equivalent:
1. A is invertible.
2. Ax = b has exactly one solution for every n × 1 matrix b.
3. Ax = b is consistent for every n × 1 matrix b.
4. Ax = 0 has only the trivial solution x = 0.
The typical way to solve such an exercise is to show a series of implications. For instance, one can proceed by showing that (a) implies (b), that (b) implies (c), that (c) implies (d), and finally that (d) implies (a). These four implications show that the four statements are equivalent.
Another way would be to show that (a) is equivalent to (b) (by proving that (a) implies (b) and that (b) implies (a)), that (b) is equivalent to (c), and that (c) is equivalent to (d). However, this way requires proving six implications, which is clearly a lot more work than just proving four implications!
I have been given some similar tasks, and have already started proving some implications. Now I wonder, how many more implications do I have to prove? Can you help me determine this?
Let A be an n × n matrix. Prove that the following statements are equivalent:
1. A is invertible.
2. Ax = b has exactly one solution for every n × 1 matrix b.
3. Ax = b is consistent for every n × 1 matrix b.
4. Ax = 0 has only the trivial solution x = 0.
The typical way to solve such an exercise is to show a series of implications. For instance, one can proceed by showing that (a) implies (b), that (b) implies (c), that (c) implies (d), and finally that (d) implies (a). These four implications show that the four statements are equivalent.
Another way would be to show that (a) is equivalent to (b) (by proving that (a) implies (b) and that (b) implies (a)), that (b) is equivalent to (c), and that (c) is equivalent to (d). However, this way requires proving six implications, which is clearly a lot more work than just proving four implications!
I have been given some similar tasks, and have already started proving some implications. Now I wonder, how many more implications do I have to prove? Can you help me determine this?
Input
On the first line one positive number: the number of testcases, at most 100. After that per testcase:
* One line containing two integers n (1 ≤ n ≤ 20000) and m (0 ≤ m ≤ 50000): the number of statements and the number of implications that have already been proved.
* m lines with two integers s1 and s2 (1 ≤ s1, s2 ≤ n and s1 ≠ s2) each, indicating that it has been proved that statement s1 implies statement s2.
* One line containing two integers n (1 ≤ n ≤ 20000) and m (0 ≤ m ≤ 50000): the number of statements and the number of implications that have already been proved.
* m lines with two integers s1 and s2 (1 ≤ s1, s2 ≤ n and s1 ≠ s2) each, indicating that it has been proved that statement s1 implies statement s2.
Output
Per testcase:
* One line with the minimum number of additional implications that need to be proved in order to prove that all statements are equivalent.
* One line with the minimum number of additional implications that need to be proved in order to prove that all statements are equivalent.
Sample Input
2
4 0
3 2
1 2
1 3
Sample Output
4
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 | #include <bits/stdc++.h> using namespace std; const int N = 20005; const int M = 50005; struct edge { int v, next; edge() {} edge( int v, int next): v(v), next(next) {} }e[M], e2[M]; int head[N], head2[N], num[N], in[N], out[N], tot, tot2; int low[N], dfn[N], Stack[N], belong[N]; int scc, Index, top; bool Instack[N]; void addedge( int u, int v, bool is) { if (is) { e[tot] = edge(v, head[u]); head[u] = tot++; } else { e2[tot2] = edge(v, head2[u]); head2[u] = tot2++; } } void Tarjan( int u) { int v; low[u] = dfn[u] = ++Index; Stack[top++] = u; Instack[u] = true ; for ( int i = head[u]; ~i; i = e[i].next) { v = e[i].v; if (!dfn[v]) { Tarjan(v); if (low[u] > low[v]) low[u] = low[v]; } else if (Instack[v] && low[u] > dfn[v]) { low[u] = dfn[v]; } } if (low[u] == dfn[u]) { scc++; do { v = Stack[--top]; Instack[v] = false ; belong[v] = scc; num[scc]++; } while (v != u); } } void solve( int n) { memset (dfn, 0, sizeof dfn); memset (Instack, false , sizeof Instack); memset (num, 0, sizeof num); Index = scc = top = 0; for ( int i = 1; i <= n; ++i) if (!dfn[i]) Tarjan(i); } void init() { tot = tot2 = 0; memset (head, -1, sizeof head); memset (head2, -1, sizeof head2); } int main() { int _; scanf ( "%d" , &_); while (_ --) { init(); int n, m, u, v; scanf ( "%d%d" , &n, &m); for ( int i = 1; i <= m ;++i) { scanf ( "%d%d" , &u, &v); addedge(u, v, true ); } solve(n); memset (in, 0, sizeof in); memset (out, 0, sizeof out); for ( int u = 1; u <= n; ++u) { for ( int i = head[u]; ~i; i = e[i].next) { int v = e[i].v; if (belong[u] != belong[v]) { addedge(belong[u], belong[v], false ); } } } for ( int u = 1; u <= scc; ++u) { for ( int i = head2[u]; ~i; i = e2[i].next) { int v = e2[i].v; in[v]++; out[u]++; } } int a = 0, b = 0; for ( int i = 1; i <= scc; ++i) { if (in[i] == 0) a++; if (out[i] == 0) b++; } printf ( "%d\n" , scc == 1 ? 0 : max(a, b)); } return 0; } |
Source
分类:
Hdu
【推荐】国内首个AI IDE,深度理解中文开发场景,立即下载体验Trae
【推荐】编程新体验,更懂你的AI,立即体验豆包MarsCode编程助手
【推荐】抖音旗下AI助手豆包,你的智能百科全书,全免费不限次数
【推荐】轻量又高性能的 SSH 工具 IShell:AI 加持,快人一步
· 开发者必知的日志记录最佳实践
· SQL Server 2025 AI相关能力初探
· Linux系列:如何用 C#调用 C方法造成内存泄露
· AI与.NET技术实操系列(二):开始使用ML.NET
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 阿里最新开源QwQ-32B,效果媲美deepseek-r1满血版,部署成本又又又降低了!
· 开源Multi-agent AI智能体框架aevatar.ai,欢迎大家贡献代码
· Manus重磅发布:全球首款通用AI代理技术深度解析与实战指南
· 被坑几百块钱后,我竟然真的恢复了删除的微信聊天记录!
· 没有Manus邀请码?试试免邀请码的MGX或者开源的OpenManus吧