WebAppConfiguration in Spring Tests
In this article, we'll explore the @WebAppConfiguration annotation in Spring, why we need it in our integration tests and also how can we configure it so that these tests actually bootstrap a WebApplicationContext.
2. @WebAppConfiguration
Simply put, this is a class-level annotation used to create a web version of the application context in the Spring Framework.
It's used to denote that the ApplicationContext which is bootstrapped for the test should be an instance ofWebApplicationContext.
A quick note about usage – we'll usually find this annotation in integration tests because the WebApplicationContextis used to build a MockMvc object. You can find more information about integration testing with Spring here.
3. Loading a WebApplicationContext
Starting with Spring 3.2, there is now support for loading a WebApplicationContext in integration tests:
@WebAppConfiguration @ContextConfiguration(classes = WebConfig.class) public class EmployeeControllerTest { ... }
This instructs the TestContext framework that a WebApplicationContext should be loaded for the test.
And, in the background a MockServletContext is created and supplied to our test's WebApplicationContext by theTestContext framework.
3.1. Configuration Options
However, we can override this by simply providing an alternate path to the @WebAppConfiguration annotation:
@WebAppConfiguration("src/test/webapp")
We can also reference a base resource path from the classpath instead of the file system:
@WebAppConfiguration("classpath:test-web-resources")
3.2. Caching
Once the WebApplicationContext is loaded it will be cached and reused for all subsequent tests that declare the same unique context configuration within the same test suite.
For further details on caching, you can consult the Context caching section of the reference manual.
4. Using @WebAppConfiguration in Tests
Now that we understand why do we need to add the @WebAppConfiguration annotation in our test classes, let's seewhat happens if we miss adding it when we are using a WebApplicationContext.
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) // @WebAppConfiguration omitted on purpose @ContextConfiguration(classes = WebConfig.class) public class EmployeeTest { @Autowired private WebApplicationContext webAppContext; private MockMvc mockMvc; @Before public void setup() { MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this); mockMvc = MockMvcBuilders.webAppContextSetup(webAppContext).build(); } ... }
Notice that we commented out the annotation to simulate the scenario in which we forget to add it. Here it's easy to see why the test will fail when we run the JUnit test: we are trying to autowire the WebApplicationContext in a class where we haven't set one.
A more typical example however is a test that uses a web-enabled Spring configuration; that's actually enough to make the test break.
Let's have a look:
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) // @WebAppConfiguration omitted on purpose @ContextConfiguration(classes = WebConfig.class) public class EmployeeTestWithoutMockMvc { @Autowired private EmployeeController employeeController; ... }
Even though the above example isn't autowiring a WebApplicationContext it will still fail because it's trying to use a web-enabled configuration – WebConfig:
@Configuration @EnableWebMvc @ComponentScan("com.baeldung.web") public class WebConfig implements WebMvcConfigurer { ... }
The annotation @EnableWebMvc is the culprit here – that will basically require a web enabled Spring context, and without it – we'll see the test fail:
Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No qualifying bean of type [javax.servlet.ServletContext] found for dependency: expected at least 1 bean which qualifies as autowire candidate for this dependency. Dependency annotations: {@org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired(required=true)} at o.s.b.f.s.DefaultListableBeanFactory .raiseNoSuchBeanDefinitionException(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:1373) at o.s.b.f.s.DefaultListableBeanFactory .doResolveDependency(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:1119) at o.s.b.f.s.DefaultListableBeanFactory .resolveDependency(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:1014) at o.s.b.f.a.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor$AutowiredFieldElement .inject(AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java:545) ... 43 more
So that's the problem that we're easily fixing by adding the @WebAppConfiguration annotation to our tests.
5. Conclusion
In this article we showed how we can let the TestContext framework to load a WebApplicationContext into our integration tests just by adding the annotation.
Finally, we looked at the examples that even though if we add the @ContextConfiguration to the test, this won't be able to work unless we add the @WebAppConfiguration annotation.
The implementation of the examples in this article are available in our repository on GitHub.
本文转自:https://www.baeldung.com/spring-webappconfiguration?from=singlemessage
【推荐】国内首个AI IDE,深度理解中文开发场景,立即下载体验Trae
【推荐】编程新体验,更懂你的AI,立即体验豆包MarsCode编程助手
【推荐】抖音旗下AI助手豆包,你的智能百科全书,全免费不限次数
【推荐】轻量又高性能的 SSH 工具 IShell:AI 加持,快人一步
· AI与.NET技术实操系列(二):开始使用ML.NET
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 探究高空视频全景AR技术的实现原理
· 理解Rust引用及其生命周期标识(上)
· 浏览器原生「磁吸」效果!Anchor Positioning 锚点定位神器解析
· DeepSeek 开源周回顾「GitHub 热点速览」
· 物流快递公司核心技术能力-地址解析分单基础技术分享
· .NET 10首个预览版发布:重大改进与新特性概览!
· AI与.NET技术实操系列(二):开始使用ML.NET
· 单线程的Redis速度为什么快?
2018-01-05 Cannot change version of project facet Dynamic Web Module to 3.0 requires Java 1.6 or newer 解决方案
2018-01-05 mysql 子查询