Paper review

前言：

最近在实验室搬砖，被导师要求写conference paper的review，看完论文后，却不知道如果下手写review。此文用于记录一些review模板句子。

资料汇总

1. 【入门】描述了review的一些基础要求
   https://www.sciencemag.org/authors/peer-review-science-publications?r3f_986=https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_39278265/article/details/82799414
2. 【还没看感觉以后会用到，码一下】投稿、审稿以及修改稿件时的常用句型
   https://blog.csdn.net/luckydongbin/article/details/1701500?utm_medium=distribute.pc_relevant.none-task-blog-BlogCommendFromMachineLearnPai2-3.channel_param&depth_1-utm_source=distribute.pc_relevant.none-task-blog-BlogCommendFromMachineLearnPai2-3.channel_param
3. How to Review一个网站
   https://web.njit.edu/~bieber/review.html#samples
4. 如何评审一篇论文？（How to review a paper?）
   https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_39278265/article/details/82799414?utm_source=blogxgwz9&utm_medium=distribute.pc_relevant.none-task-blog-title-5&spm=1001.2101.3001.4242
   对应的中文翻译版：
   https://blog.csdn.net/dahailuoa6/article/details/92847537?utm_medium=distribute.pc_relevant.none-task-blog-BlogCommendFromMachineLearnPai2-4.channel_param&depth_1-utm_source=distribute.pc_relevant.none-task-blog-BlogCommendFromMachineLearnPai2-4.channel_param
5. 英文论文审稿意见模板
   http://www.360doc.cn/article/13970651_317816094.html?plg_nld=1&plg_uin=1&plg_auth=1&plg_nld=1&plg_usr=1&plg_vkey=1&plg_dev=1

Tips

• "论文写作，创新性，实验，引用。尤其是方法的创新性和实验，我个人觉得这两部分是最重要的。"[1]
• 平时可以记录一下比较local的英文表达。
• 边读边在PDF上标记你觉得好和不好的地方以及原因。
• 英语差的同学可以在写完意见之后，用作文批改网作文批改网进行一下语法检查，然后自己再检查一次保证你的评审意见没有语法错误.

模板句子

A. accept
The authors have made sufficient modifications according to the modification comments, and I suggest that this paper be accepted without further modification.

B. reject
This paper proposes XXX. The work of this paper is clear and logical. However, I have to reject it because of the following problems:

1. [文法错误] There are so many errors in the manuscript, such as, in page 1, ABSTRACT, XXX would be XXX.

2. [创新不够] The method of this paper is not innovative enough. In fact, most of the work is done by combining other people’s methods. Authors need to highlight their innovative contributions.

3. [实验不足] Another obvious problem with this paper is the lack of sufficient experimentation to demonstrate the validity and applicability of the proposed method. Too few experiments and too many hyperparameters make the conclusion of this paper lack persuasive.

C. Minor Changes/Major
This paper proposes XXX. The work of this paper is practical and logical. However, there are some problems to be further improved as well:

1. [文法错误] There is at least one Spelling error in the manuscript, such as, in page 7, TABLE I, “Stabalization” would be “Stabilization”. Please check the manuscript carefully.

2. [创新不够] The innovations in this paper focus on novel applications, and the methods and theoretical innovations are not sufficient. The author must dig deeper into the innovation points before the article can be accepted by XXX.

3. [实验不足] Another obvious problem with this paper is the lack of enough experimentation to demonstrate the validity and applicability of the proposed method. The author needs to do more experiments with more angles and show them in this paper.

4. [文献不足] For the problem of using of video information in the field of transportation, so many methods are proposed, such as, XXX, and, XXX. Perhaps the author can find inspiration by reading more literature in this field to further optimize this paper.

参考链接

[1] https://blog.csdn.net/l317820483/article/details/85254952?utm_medium=distribute.pc_relevant.none-task-blog-BlogCommendFromMachineLearnPai2-1.channel_param&depth_1-utm_source=distribute.pc_relevant.none-task-blog-BlogCommendFromMachineLearnPai2-1.channel_param
[2]