Burton, Craig crburton at tnsi.com
Wed Jun 6 13:58:03 EDT 2012
- Previous message: [odb-users] query results not being cached?
- Next message: [odb-users] query results not being cached?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Boris, My apologies; I see now (with some embarrassment) that this specific Oracle limitation is well documented. Under many circumstances, our application expects to find exactly zero or one instance for many specific queries, but finding two or more would lead to an error scenario. Application logic is the following in many such cases: if zero instances, create a new one if one instance, update the one found in the db if two or more, do nothing and return an error Your alternative approach using the view works well for my needs, since I can determine the count and then perform the query if there is, indeed, only one instance. I don't see a clean way to do the same by only iterating over the result, unless the iteration determines the count and temporarily holds a reference to the single instance (if there is only one). I'll continue to try a few different approaches to see which one is most compatible with our current implementation. Thanks again for your help! Craig -----Original Message----- From: Boris Kolpackov [mailto:boris at codesynthesis.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:15 AM To: Burton, Craig Cc: odb-users at codesynthesis.com Subject: Re: [odb-users] query results not being cached? Hi Craig, Burton, Craig <crburton at tnsi.com> writes: > I am not able to call "size()" on query results even if I try to use > the "cache()" method on the results template. For some databases (right now Oracle, SQLite, and MS SQL Server), caching (and therefore size()) is not supported. This is documented in the database-specific chapters. For Oracle that would be Section 16.5.2, "Query Result Caching": http://www.codesynthesis.com/products/odb/doc/manual.xhtml#16.5.2 If you are interested, in the case or Oracle, supporting size() would require switching the query result cursor to the scrollable mode. This results in a much worse performance compared to the forward-only mode. There is also a long and complicated list of limitations of scrollable cursors that stipulate the kind of situations that are not supported (specifically, support for BLOB/LONG types is very limited). So it is better to try not to rely on knowing in advance the number of entries in the result. Specifically, any optimizations that you may want to make (e.g., reserve the space in the vector, etc), will be inconsequential compared to the cost of supporting size(). If you really need to know the size prior to the iteration, then the best you can do is probably run a separate query that returns the count, for example: #pragma db view object(MyPersistentClass) struct MyPersistentClassCount { #pragma db column("count(*)") std::size_t count; }; size_t count = ora_db->query<MyPersistentClassCount> (pred)->begin ()->count; Boris This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information of Transaction Network Services. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
- Previous message: [odb-users] query results not being cached?
- Next message: [odb-users] query results not being cached?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
【推荐】国内首个AI IDE,深度理解中文开发场景,立即下载体验Trae
【推荐】编程新体验,更懂你的AI,立即体验豆包MarsCode编程助手
【推荐】抖音旗下AI助手豆包,你的智能百科全书,全免费不限次数
【推荐】轻量又高性能的 SSH 工具 IShell:AI 加持,快人一步
· SQL Server 2025 AI相关能力初探
· Linux系列:如何用 C#调用 C方法造成内存泄露
· AI与.NET技术实操系列(二):开始使用ML.NET
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 探究高空视频全景AR技术的实现原理
· 阿里最新开源QwQ-32B,效果媲美deepseek-r1满血版,部署成本又又又降低了!
· 单线程的Redis速度为什么快?
· SQL Server 2025 AI相关能力初探
· AI编程工具终极对决:字节Trae VS Cursor,谁才是开发者新宠?
· 展开说说关于C#中ORM框架的用法!
2014-08-07 boost uuid 学习笔记
2014-08-07 boost uuid