通用查询设计思想(2)- 基于ADO.Net的设计
前言
不少公司用的是ADO.NET的访问方式,估计不少朋友对于sql的拼写真是没太多好感,在没有一个封装足够好的底层的项目(还需要考虑sql注入等问题),特别是经过许多人接手之后,代码那叫一个惨不忍睹,本文借助【通用查询设计思想】这篇文章的思想和基于ADO.NET进行通用查询设计。
【通用查询设计思想】这篇文章是基于核心方法GenerateQueryExpression来生成表达式的,基于这个思想我们重新写个方法拼装成类似sql中的where条件
/// <summary> /// 生成查询条件 /// </summary> /// <typeparam name="TEntity">要查询的实体类型</typeparam> public static string GenerateQueryCriterion<TEntity>(this IQuery<TEntity> query) where TEntity : class { var criterion = " where 1 = 1 "; if (query == null) return criterion; var condition = " and "; var returnStr = string.Empty; var queryType = query.GetType(); foreach (PropertyInfo property in queryType.GetProperties()) { var value = property.GetValue(query); if (null == value) continue; if (value is string) { var str = ((string)value).Trim(); value = string.IsNullOrEmpty(str) ? null : str; } //针对QueryMode特性获取我们指定要查询的路径 foreach (var attribute in property.GetAttributes<QueryModeAttribute>()) { var propertyPath = attribute.PropertyPath; if (propertyPath == null) propertyPath = property.Name; var conditionStr = CreateConditionString(value, propertyPath, attribute.Compare); if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(conditionStr)) continue; returnStr += condition + conditionStr; } } return criterion + returnStr; } /// <summary> /// 生成sql条件 /// </summary> /// <param name="value"></param> /// <param name="propertyPath"></param> /// <param name="compare"></param> /// <returns></returns> private static string CreateConditionString(object value, string propertyPath, QueryCompare compare) { switch (compare) { case QueryCompare.Equal: return CreateEqualString(propertyPath, value); case QueryCompare.GreaterThanOrEqual: return CreateGreaterThanOrEqualString(propertyPath, value); case QueryCompare.LessThanOrEqual: return CreateLessThanOrEqualString(propertyPath, value); case QueryCompare.Like: return CreateLikeString(propertyPath, value); default: return null; } } /// <summary> /// 生成sql的等于条件 /// </summary> /// <param name="propertyPath"></param> /// <param name="value"></param> /// <returns></returns> private static string CreateEqualString(string propertyPath, object value) { if (value == null) return string.Empty; if (value is string) { return propertyPath + "='" + value + "'"; } if (value is bool) { if (value.ToString() == "False") return propertyPath + "=0"; return propertyPath + "=1"; } return propertyPath + "=" + value; }
方法返回的就是我们常见的“ 1 = 1 and System='A' ” 这样的查询条件,其他的类似 大于,小于,like这些条件,相信以朋友们高超的智慧肯定不是什么难事:)
为避免新朋友没看过【通用查询设计思想】这篇文章,个人把这次的变动的类罗列出来
查询基类(保留表达式的方法,兼容同时使用Linq和ADO.NET的情况:))
public class Query<TEntity> : IQuery<TEntity> where TEntity: class { /// <summary> /// 指定查询条件 /// </summary> protected Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> Predicate; /// <summary> /// 创建一个新的 <see cref="Query{TEntity}"/> /// </summary> public Query() { } /// <summary> /// 创建一个指定查询条件的<see cref="Query{TEntity}"/> /// </summary> /// <param name="predicate">指定的查询条件</param> public Query(Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> predicate) { Predicate = predicate; } /// <summary> /// 生成表达式 /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> GenerateExpression() { return Predicate.And(this.GetQueryExpression()); } /// <summary> /// 生成sql条件 /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public string GenerateSqlCriterion() { return this.GenerateQueryCriterion(); } }
查询模式(保留PropertyPath给表达式,PropertyPath2不是数组,因为ADO.NET中应该不会涉及到导航属性)
public class QueryModeAttribute : Attribute { /// <summary> /// 比较方式 /// </summary> public QueryCompare Compare { get; set; } /// <summary> /// 对应属性路径(Linq + Expression) /// </summary> public string[] PropertyPath { get; set; } /// <summary> /// 对应属性路径(sql + ADO.NET) /// </summary> public string PropertyPath2 { get; set; } /// <summary> /// 查询字段 /// </summary> public QueryModeAttribute(params string[] propertyPath) { PropertyPath = propertyPath; } /// <summary> /// 查询字段 /// </summary> public QueryModeAttribute(QueryCompare compare,params string[] propertyPath) { PropertyPath = propertyPath; Compare = compare; } /// <summary> /// 查询字段 /// </summary> public QueryModeAttribute(QueryCompare compare, string propertyPath2) { PropertyPath2 = propertyPath2; Compare = compare; } }
查询实体
public class AccountQuery : PageQuery<Account> { /// <summary> /// 姓名 /// </summary> [Query(QueryCompare.Equal, nameof(Account.Name))] public string Name { get; set; } //其他查询条件... }
这样的话我们的之前的表达式写法成了下面这样
public class AccountQuery : PageQuery<Account> { /// <summary> /// 姓名 /// </summary> [Query(QueryCompare.Equal, new[]{nameof(Account.Name)})] public string Name { get; set; } //其他查询条件... }
来看一下我们完整的使用例子,很多情况下我们是需要分页和添加类似于Order By或者Group By这样的高级条件(本例子前端是使用layui,数据库是mysql)
public PageResult<AccountDto> GetAccount(AccountQuery query) { var sql = @"select xx,xx,xx from user "; var criterion = query.GenerateSqlCriterion(); sql += criterion; return return MySqlHelper.GetPageResult<AccountDto>(sql, null, query); } /// <summary> /// 获取分页数据 /// </summary> /// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam> /// <param name="cmdText"></param> /// <param name="cmdParms"></param> /// <param name="pageInfo"></param> /// <param name="groupBy"></param> /// <returns></returns> public static PageResult<T> GetPageResult<T>(string cmdText, MySqlParameter[] cmdParms, PageInfo pageInfo, string groupBy = "") where T : class, new() { var result = new PageResult<T> { PageSize = pageInfo.PageSize, PageIndex = pageInfo.PageIndex }; //获取总数 var sqlCount = $"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ({cmdText}) TableCount "; var objCount = ExecuteScalar(CommandType.Text, sqlCount, cmdParms); result.TotalCount = Convert.ToInt32(objCount); string pagingSql; //获取分页数据 if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(groupBy)) { pagingSql = $"{cmdText} ORDER BY {pageInfo.Field ?? "id"} {pageInfo.Order ?? "desc"} " + $"LIMIT {pageInfo.PageIndex}, {pageInfo.PageSize}"; } else { //Group by pagingSql = $"{cmdText} GROUP BY {groupBy} ORDER BY {pageInfo.Field ?? "id"} {pageInfo.Order ?? "desc"}" + $"LIMIT {pageInfo.PageIndex}, {pageInfo.PageSize}"; } var dt = ExecuteDataTable(CommandType.Text, pagingSql, cmdParms); if (dt != null) { result.Data = dt.ToList<T>(); } return result; }
当然,这只是我们的一般查询情况,实际情况中我们会遇到更复杂的sql,基于本文的中心主题,不再深入讨论其他场景。
让我知道如果你有更好的想法!
如果你觉得该文章还不错且有所收获,请右下角推荐一下,也可留下您的问题或建议,让我们共同进步。
原创博客请在转载时保留原文链接或者在文章开头加上本人博客地址!
作者:lex-wu,原文链接:https://www.cnblogs.com/lex-wu/p/10486959.html