何为breakpad：
如果你的程序是C++程序，crash的时候无所适从，那么你可以考虑使用一下看看
https://blog.csdn.net/fengyulinde/article/details/81707346
1
准备：
库，代码，编译好
./configure && make
make中要是报错：
头文件linux_syscall_support.h，该头文件要放在\src\third_party\lss目录下，其中lss目录要自己建
make install
install后下面
/usr/local/include/
/usr/local/lib/
libbreakpad.a
libbreakpad_client.a
2.
库集成到自己的工程：
头文件：
#include "client/linux/handler/exception_handler.h"
#include "third_party/lss/linux_syscall_support.h"
#include "client/linux/handler/minidump_descriptor.h"
捕捉函数：
static bool dumpCallback(const google_breakpad::MinidumpDescriptor& descriptor,
void* context,
bool succeeded)
{
std::cout << "Dump path:" << descriptor.path() << std::endl;
return succeeded;
}
程序开始加入捕捉
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
google_breakpad::MinidumpDescriptor descriptor("/srv/log");
google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler eh(descriptor, nullptr, dumpCallback, nullptr, true, -1);
IgnoreSignals();
setCorDump();
......
}
3.
编译工程会报错：
"inttypes.h has already been included before this header file, but
without __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS defined"
查看源文件：
breakpad\include\google_breakpad\common\breakpad_types.h
注释掉后，编译成功
集成完成，出现crash，开发执行分析：
1. gen sym files：
dump_syms ./test-server > test-server.sym
dump_syms /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.31.so > libc-2.31.so.sym
2. 组织好symbols目录结构,结构必须严格，否则最后读不到符号文件
$ head -n1 test-server.sym
MODULE Linux x86_64 1B84C720DE19E3AE62EADD07379DA3F90 test-server
-symbols（一级目录，别的什么目录下无所谓）
-----app(二级目录，如：test-server)
--------id(三级目录，如：1B84C720DE19E3AE62EADD07379DA3F90）
------------files:（四级文件：如：test-server.sym ）
-----so1
xxx
如：
symbols
--test-server
-------1B84C720DE19E3AE62EADD07379DA3F90
-----------test-server.sym
--libc-2.31.so
--------25929B09B0BC19D0D9D60884BE583EB30
-----------libc-2.31.so.sym
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build$ cd symbols/
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols$ ls -l
total 8
drwxrwxr-x 3 leehm leehm 4096 Jul 23 09:07 test-server
drwxrwxr-x 3 leehm leehm 4096 Jul 23 11:46 libc-2.31.so
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols$ cd test-server/
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols/test-server$ ls -l
total 4
drwxrwxr-x 2 leehm leehm 4096 Jul 23 09:13 1B84C720DE19E3AE62EADD07379DA3F90
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols/test-server$ cd 1B84C720DE19E3AE62EADD07379DA3F90/
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols/test-server/1B84C720DE19E3AE62EADD07379DA3F90$ ls -l
total 44888
-rw-rw-r-- 1 leehm leehm 45964328 Jul 23 08:08 test-server.sym
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols/test-server/1B84C720DE19E3AE62EADD07379DA3F90$
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build$ cd symbols/
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols$ ls -l
total 8
drwxrwxr-x 3 leehm leehm 4096 Jul 23 09:07 test-server
drwxrwxr-x 3 leehm leehm 4096 Jul 23 11:46 libc-2.31.so
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols$ cd libc-2.31.so/
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols/libc-2.31.so$ ls -l
total 4
drwxrwxr-x 2 leehm leehm 4096 Jul 23 11:46 25929B09B0BC19D0D9D60884BE583EB30
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols/libc-2.31.so$ cd 25929B09B0BC19D0D9D60884BE583EB30/
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols/libc-2.31.so/25929B09B0BC19D0D9D60884BE583EB30$ ls -l
total 2652
-rw-rw-r-- 1 leehm leehm 2714420 Jul 23 11:43 libc-2.31.so.sym
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build/symbols/libc-2.31.so/25929B09B0BC19D0D9D60884BE583EB30$
3. 生成crash的log
sudo minidump_stackwalk /srv/log/8b268c24-eb30-4f24-4da6609d-234c1a05.dmp ./symbols > error.1.log
4. 查看crash生成的log，定位crash的行数
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build$ cat error.1.log
Operating system: Linux
0.0.0 Linux 5.4.0-77-generic #86-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 17 02:35:03 UTC 2021 x86_64
CPU: amd64
family 6 model 158 stepping 9
1 CPU
GPU: UNKNOWN
Crash reason: SIGSEGV /SEGV_MAPERR
Crash address: 0x0
Process uptime: not available
Thread 0 (crashed)
0 libc-2.31.so!__memmove_avx_unaligned_erms + 0xad
rax = 0x0000000000000000 rdx = 0x0000000000000002
rcx = 0x0000000000000031 rbx = 0x000055994f058360
rsi = 0x0000000000000031 rdi = 0x0000000000000000
rbp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e150 rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1d828
r8 = 0x0000000000000000 r9 = 0x00007ffeb8e1d500
r10 = 0x00007ffeb8e1d550 r11 = 0x0000000000000000
r12 = 0x0000000000000000 r13 = 0x0000000000000000
r14 = 0x000055994eb8d720 r15 = 0x00007ffeb8e1de10
rip = 0x00007f3114e1e71d
Found by: given as instruction pointer in context
1 test-server!main [string_fortified.h : 90 + 0x13]
rbp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e150 rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1d830
rip = 0x000055994d929c1e
Found by: stack scanning
2 libc-2.31.so!__libc_start_main [libc-start.c : 308 + 0x1a]
rbx = 0x000055994e85fe00 rbp = 0x0000000000000000
rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e160 r12 = 0x000055994d931490
r13 = 0x00007ffeb8e1e240 r14 = 0x0000000000000000
r15 = 0x0000000000000000 rip = 0x00007f3114cb70b3
Found by: call frame info
3 test-server + 0xdca20
rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e180 rip = 0x000055994d929a20
Found by: stack scanning
4 test-server + 0x1012e00
rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e188 rip = 0x000055994e85fe00
Found by: stack scanning
5 test-server + 0xe4490
rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e198 rip = 0x000055994d931490
Found by: stack scanning
6 test-server + 0xe4490
rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e210 rip = 0x000055994d931490
Found by: stack scanning
7 test-server!_start + 0x2e
rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e230 rip = 0x000055994d9314be
Found by: stack scanning
8 0x7ffeb8e1e238
rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e238 rip = 0x00007ffeb8e1e238
Found by: call frame info
9 0x7ffeb8ffb000
rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e2e0 rip = 0x00007ffeb8ffb000
Found by: stack scanning
10 0x7f3117376000
rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e350 rip = 0x00007f3117376000
Found by: stack scanning
11 test-server + 0xe4490
rsp = 0x00007ffeb8e1e370 rip = 0x000055994d931490
Found by: stack scanning
Thread 1
0 libpthread-2.31.so + 0x107b1
rax = 0xfffffffffffffdfc rdx = 0x0000000000000000
rcx = 0x00007f31151e67b1 rbx = 0x000055994f076c58
rsi = 0x0000000000000189 rdi = 0x000055994f076c70
rbp = 0x000055994f076c48 rsp = 0x00007f31149c8d40
r8 = 0x0000000000000000 r9 = 0x00000000ffffffff
r10 = 0x00007f31149c8e40 r11 = 0x0000000000000246
r12 = 0x000055994f076c6c r13 = 0x000055994f076c20
r14 = 0x000055994f076c70 r15 = 0x00007f31149c8d90
rip = 0x00007f31151e67b1
Found by: given as instruction pointer in context
1 libpthread-2.31.so + 0x10050
rsp = 0x00007f31149c8d98 rip = 0x00007f31151e6050
Found by: stack scanning
2 test-server!std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<spdlog::details::periodic_worker::periodic_worker(std::function<void ()> const&, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1l> >)::{lambda()#1}> > >::_M_run() [gthr-default.h : 871 + 0x5]
rsp = 0x00007f31149c8e20 rip = 0x000055994d97a5ff
Found by: stack scanning
3 libstdc++.so.6.0.28 + 0xd6de4
rbx = 0x0000000000000000 rbp = 0x000055994f07df10
rsp = 0x00007f31149c8ea0 r12 = 0x00007ffeb8e1d38e
r13 = 0x00007ffeb8e1d38f r14 = 0x00007ffeb8e1d390
r15 = 0x00007f31149c8f80 rip = 0x00007f31150c4de4
Found by: call frame info
4 libpthread-2.31.so + 0x9609
rsp = 0x00007f31149c8ec0 rip = 0x00007f31151df609
Found by: stack scanning
5 libc-2.31.so!__GI___clone + 0x43
rsp = 0x00007f31149c8f80 rip = 0x00007f3114db2293
Found by: stack scanning
Loaded modules:
0x55994d84d000 - 0x55994e85ffff test-server ??? (main)
0x7f31149d2000 - 0x7f3114a8bfff libfdk-aac.so.1 ???
0x7f3114c90000 - 0x7f3114e2cfff libc-2.31.so ???
0x7f3114e82000 - 0x7f3114e96fff libgcc_s.so.1 ???
0x7f3114e9f000 - 0x7f3114f54fff libm-2.31.so ???
0x7f3114fee000 - 0x7f3115174fff libstdc++.so.6.0.28 ??? (WARNING: No symbols, libstdc++.so.6.0.28, 03660EC9CDC747F813CD445700A575D30)
0x7f31151d0000 - 0x7f31151d2fff libdl-2.31.so ???
0x7f31151d6000 - 0x7f31151edfff libpthread-2.31.so ??? (WARNING: No symbols, libpthread-2.31.so, F76147E554B5FCD0C1562959665D93DF0)
0x7f31151f9000 - 0x7f311540bfff libcrypto.so.1.1 ???
0x7f31154cf000 - 0x7f3115539fff libssl.so.1.1 ???
0x7f3115564000 - 0x7f3115626fff libsioclient_tls.so.1 ???
0x7f3115665000 - 0x7f311567bfff libswresample.so.3.8.100 ???
0x7f3115684000 - 0x7f31156fbfff libswscale.so. ???
0x7f3115717000 - 0x7f31157a0fff libavutil.so.56.60.100 ???
0x7f31159d3000 - 0x7f3115b94fff libavformat.so. ???
0x7f3115c3c000 - 0x7f31167e9fff libavcodec.so.58.112.103 ???
0x7f3117376000 - 0x7f3117399fff ld-2.31.so ???
0x7ffeb8ffb000 - 0x7ffeb8ffbfff linux-gate.so ???
leehm@ubuntu:~/Desktop/share/test-1.4.0/test/build$
对比crash的代码，很遗憾，最终还是无法看见详细的堆栈已经crash的点，不知道是不是库集成问题，亦或是之前编译报错强行注释掉解决编译问题导致
具体原因暂未可知。。。。。。
由于项目时间紧，暂时放弃集成使用，暂留做记录，以便后续继续研究
