[quote] Re: [ECOS] printf and diag_printf go to nowhere 2
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 03:14:38PM +0200, Robert Brusa wrote: > On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:44:34 +0200, Sergei Gavrikov > <sergei.gavri...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 06:15:50PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:42:50PM +0200, Robert Brusa wrote: >>> > Hi >>> > When running the example serial.c that comes with ecos-3.0, I get no >>> > output on the serial i/f of my AT91SAMX512-based board. I am using a >>> > configuration where I have enabled hardware drivers for ser0 and >>> ser1 and >>> > disabled ser2 (see attachment). >>> > >>> > serial performs a lookup for /dev/haldiag - and fails. In fact, this >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Ups, I missed this. Of course it will be, because, you have disabled >> *SERIAL2 == your HAL's /dev/haldiag (read the below's explanations) >> there is >> >> cdl_component CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL_ARM_AT91_SERIAL2 { user_value 0 }; >> >> in your ECM. >> >> My assumes the below were based on that what SERIAL2 device is alive. >> But that is not wrong. >> >> >> Sergei >> >> >>> > string is not present in my configurations ecc-file. What I find there >>> > is: /dev/ttydiag. But when changing haldiag to ttydiag, the result >>> is the >>> > same: No output on ser0 or ser1. >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> Now I knew your target's name and I can know what is it. So, it has 3 >>> serial channels (I did not know about). According HAL, diagnostic and >>> debug channels are asigned with channel 2 (as you named it "ser2"). So, >>> all diagnostic output, by default, will be appear on the diagnostic >>> channel or at the "ser2", won't it? >>> >>> // it should appear at "ser2" >>> diag_printf("test string\n"); >>> >>> Unfortunatly, I can only guess what you want to have. Let's assume, that >>> you want to see the output the above on "ser0". In this case you have to >>> change >>> >>> cdl_option CYGNUM_HAL_VIRTUAL_VECTOR_CONSOLE_CHANNEL { >>> user_value 0; >>> } >>> >>> for "ser1" it will "user_value 1" (by default it is equal 2 == "ser2"). >>> >>> Let's look on examples/serial.c again and your ECM options. I noted that >>> you do not tweak the option the above. >>> >>> serial.c:83:printf("Starting serial example\n"); >>> >>> According the attached ECM, your printf() will print on the device >>> >>> cdl_option CYGDAT_LIBC_STDIO_DEFAULT_CONSOLE { >>> user_value "\"/dev/ttydiag\"" >>> }; >>> >>> So, printf will be to use diagnostic channel ("ser2"), becuase, the >>> above option points on "/dev/ttydiag". Where did you expect the output? >>> It seems for me, it will appear on "ser2". >>> >>> serial.c:85:err = cyg_io_lookup( "/dev/haldiag", &handle ); >>> >>> The "/dev/ttydiag" is a device name (a generic diagnostic device name). >>> By default, when an eCos cdl_componet CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL_TTY_TTYDIAG is >>> enabled, it uses itself a layered device with name "/dev/haldiag". Look, >>> please, for a reference at >>> >>> /opt/ecos/ecos-3.0/packages/io/serial/v3_0/src/common/tty.c >>> >>> and you will see how the device's names are assigned with the layered >>> devices (dep_names) acording CDL options. >>> >>> The first and non-layered `/dev/haldiag' device exactly is >>> /opt/ecos/ecos-3.0/packages/io/serial/v3_0/src/common/haldiag.c >>> >>> Note: about a DEVTAB_ENTRY internals you can find information by a link >>> the below (look at the chapter's name as on "how-io-driver-works") >>> http://ecos.sourceware.org/docs-latest/ref/io-how-to-write-a-driver.html >>> >>> Well, I knew that "/dev/haldiag" (with your settings) is "ser2". >>> >>> > On the other hand, when changing to /dev/ser0 or /dev/ser1, I get this >>> > particular line on the ser0 or ser1 interface - as expected. But all >>> > other output generated by printf-statements still is "unvisible". >>> Is this >>> >>> Of course, particular, I can assume that that line >>> >>> "serial example is working correctly!\n"; >>> >>> will appear on "ser2". >>> >>> And when you changed CYGDAT_LIBC_STDIO_DEFAULT_CONSOLE (/dev/ser0, >>> /dev/ser1), your printf's will be there, but not on /dev/haldiag. >>> >>> Now you knew what "/dev/ttydiag" is by default, and I not saw that you >>> assigned default console with another device. So, printf will just use >>> haldiag_putc (=HAL_DIAG_WRITE_CHAR) to out strings on "ser2". And it's >>> no deal that you enabled cdl component CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL_DEVICES. >>> >>> Well, on the not-a-reduced targets (with GDB support) those printf's, by >>> default, all will appear just in GDB (on diagnostic | debug channel). >>> >>> So, if you know where you want to see the diagnostic output, specify >>> that with cdl_option CYGNUM_HAL_VIRTUAL_VECTOR_CONSOLE_CHANNEL. >>> >>> I hope, that was it. >>> >>> Sergei >>> >>> > a bug or do I get something wrong? >>> > Robert >>> >>> >>> > -- >>> > Before posting, please read the FAQ: >>> http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos >>> > and search the list archive: >>> http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss > > Hi Sergei > thank you for your help. Following your script I achieved that I get the > following output on uart1: > --------------------- > Starting serial example > Found /dev/haldiag. Writing string.... > serial example is working correctly! > I think I wrote the string. Did you see it? > Serial example finished > --------------------- > An this is absoutely great. what I want at the end is to use: > serial_0 for efficient bidirectional (interrupt driven) communication > serial_1 should act as my console-device (also efficient) > serial_2 is not wired on my board, but I possibly could use it to access > the output to serial_2 through my JTAG debugger. I will have to test > this. > > What I do not yet understand: Is diag_printf in my current configuration > (see attachment) now going to serial_2 using an at91-specific efficient > driver or still the polling write routine? Or none of both, because there > is a conflict? > > I coninue testing. I think much of what I want to achieve is now working. > It looks good. Thanks > Robert
Robert, as _I_ understand/understood eCos offers 1) a non-interrupt driven diagnostic output on UART, it's a wellknow diag_printf() and diag_*() routings. I look on it as on atomic hal_diag_led() :-), it can be placed even in ISRs. It uses a polled mode. It is a very useful thing on a debug stage. By defualt, it is serial_2 for your HAL. Every diag_printf() in your program used it. Once again, by default it is polled raw output and blocking input. 2) the interrup-driven serial drivers: 1st kind of them is a raw serial driver, 2nd kind is a tty-like serial driver (a bit overhead let us to have an ability to edit the entered lines), and 3rd -- the termios-like serial drivers (there is more overhead there, but it is a portable way to manage the terminals); I can assume that your needs are to get the raw serial driver on the serial_0 ("/dev/ser0"). I assume it will be used, for example, either for PPP or SLIP interface and the tty-like serial driver on serial_1 ("/dev/tty1"). First, you need to enable CDL component cdl_componet CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL_DEVICES { user_value 1; } to get working the interrupt driven serial drivers. I also assume that you want to get non-blocking I/O for those serial ports. That's it cdl_option CYGOPT_IO_SERIAL_SUPPORT_NONBLOCKING { user_value 1; }; Think about any king of flow control if you need to have it. cdl_component CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL_FLOW_CONTROL { ... The above is your decision. At the least you can have XON/XOFF, a HW frow control is hardware depended (I do not know what is your UARTs). But, my question is, Do you need it? Be careful with flow control. For serial_1 enable the below component (it will be your /dev/ser0): cyg_io_lookup("/dev/ser0", ...); cdl_component CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL_ARM_AT91_SERIAL0 { user_value 1; }; Look then on other options CYGNUM_IO_SERIAL_ARM_AT91_SERIAL0_* and change that what you need (e.g., you will want to increase default buffer size). Now the serial_1. cdl_component CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL_ARM_AT91_SERIAL1 { user_value 1; }; Look then on other options CYGNUM_IO_SERIAL_ARM_AT91_SERIAL1_* and change that what you need. As I could understand, you tnink about serail_1 as TTY-like console, so, enable the option the below: cyg_io_lookup("/dev/tty1", ...); cdl_component CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL_TTY_TTY1 { user_value 1 }; And I assume that you do want to see ptintfs on this console, doesn't you? cdl_option CYGDAT_LIBC_STDIO_DEFAULT_CONSOLE { user_value \"/dev/tty1\" }; I guess that printf ("hello, world!\n") will appear on your serial_1. And I assume that fgets(buf, MAXLINE, stdin) will works too for the serial_1. If you plan to make some pice of a termios code to spin on serial_1, you will need to enable the component cdl_component CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL_TERMIOS { user_value 1 }; and then you can try to "open" it as cyg_io_lookup("/dev/termios1", ...); And at the end about diagnostic port (serial_2). To get a polled mode only you can disable cdl_component CYGPKG_IO_SERIAL_ARM_AT91_SERIAL2 { user_value 0 }; And then you won't be able "open" (cyg_io_lookup("/dev/haldiag", ...); You saw it already. That device wraps a non-layered TTY-like "/dev/ttydiag". BUT, you will be able to call diagnostic "atomic" routings (e.g. diag_printf) and it's output will be appear on serial_2, If you want to have TTY-like ability (line buffered output) on HAL diagnostic, enable the component the above; and then examples/serial.c will be able to manage "/dev/haldiag", you saw that too. If you have not the connector on serial_2, it won't be useful for you. And it is bad, because eCos sources use a lot the diagnostic routings (assertions fails, debug messages, etc.). It seems for me that you have to up a few configurations on a debug stage. To get work diagnostic either on serial_0 or serial_1 (remember about console channel #). cdl_option CYGNUM_HAL_VIRTUAL_VECTOR_CONSOLE_CHANNEL { ... Note: Your friend at configure stages cdl_option CYGDBG_IO_INIT But, all outputs will appear on diagnostic channel! By the way, I remember someone on the list told about "a redirection" diagnostic output into an area of RAM. Look what HAL_DIAG_WRITE_CHAR is. And surf throught out the list. IMHO, it is useful to enable cdl_option CYGBLD_IO_SERIAL_EXTRA_TESTS and look at those sources and play with the tests. Well, everyone (I'm not exception! :-) dreams about: $ yes | make config to get a working linux kernel for own needs, but, in the most cases it is not possible. IMHO, eCos is the same: ecosconfig new <target> is just a start... Good luck, Sergei
posted on 2013-12-02 21:20 Shawn X.Y. Bai 阅读(601) 评论(0) 编辑 收藏 举报