WinRunner Compared to QuickTest Pro
Environment Coverage Comparison:
![点击图片可在新窗口打开 *](http://www.51testing.com/ddimg/uploadimg/20070206/1304150.gif)
Web-Related Environments
|
IE, Netscape, AOL
|
|
JDK, Java Foundation Classes, AWT
|
|
Symantec Visual Café
|
|
ActiveX Controls
|
ERP/CRM
|
Oracle: Jinitiator, 11i, NCA
|
Custom Client Server
|
Windows
|
|
C++/C
|
|
Visual Basic
|
Operating Systems
|
Windows 98, 2000, NT, ME, XP
|
Legacy
|
3270, 5250 Emulators
|
|
VT100
|
![点击图片可在新窗口打开 *](http://www.51testing.com/ddimg/uploadimg/20070206/1304150.gif)
Custom Client/Server
|
PowerBuilder
|
|
Forte
|
|
Delphi
|
|
Centura
|
|
Stingray
|
|
SmallTalk
|
ERP/CRM
|
Baan
|
|
PeopleSoft Windows
|
|
Siebel 5, 6 GUI Clients
|
|
Oracle GUI Forms
|
![点击图片可在新窗口打开 *](http://www.51testing.com/ddimg/uploadimg/20070206/1304150.gif)
ERP/CRM
|
SAP
|
|
Siebel 7.x
|
|
PeopleSoft 8.x
|
.Net
|
WinForms
|
|
WebForms
|
|
.Net controls
|
Web Services
|
XML, HTTP
|
|
WSDL, SOAP
|
|
J2EE, .Net
|
Multimedia
|
RealAudio/Video
|
|
Flash
|
Feature Comparison:
![点击图片可在新窗口打开 *](http://www.51testing.com/ddimg/uploadimg/20070206/1304150.gif)
Record/Replay
|
ODBC & Excel Connectivity
|
Code Editor & Debugger
|
Recovery Manager
|
Shared Object Repository
|
Rapid Object Import
|
Numerous Checkpoints
|
Analog
|
scrīpt & Function Libraries
|
|
![点击图片可在新窗口打开 *](http://www.51testing.com/ddimg/uploadimg/20070206/1304150.gif)
Function Generator
|
Database Integration
|
Run Wizard
|
TSL
|
MDI
|
|
![点击图片可在新窗口打开 *](http://www.51testing.com/ddimg/uploadimg/20070206/1304150.gif)
ActiveScreen
|
TestGuard
|
Tree View
|
scrīptFusion
|
Data Table
|
VBscrīpt
|
Function Generator*
(coming in v7.0)
|
Run Wizard*
(coming in v7.0)
|
WinRunner和Quick Test Professional(简称QTP)都是MERCURY公司开发的非常强大功能自动化测试工具,从时间上来看,WinRunner在1995年便已经推出,而QTP直到2002年才正式推出。
我想从以下几点来谈谈我个人的看法,这里只列出它们两者的不同点:
1.从界面来看:WinRunner只有一个显示脚本的界面,而QTP的Kyword View 、Expert View、Data Table、Active Screen四个界面可以显示在同一个窗口,在脚本回放时让人可以时时刻刻了解到脚本运行的情况,虽然这些功能WinRunner都可以实现,但相比较下QTP更直观、更好;
2.从支持的语言来看:如上表列出的,两者有所不同,在这我就不再列出;
3.从生成的脚本来看:WinRunner生成的是TSL脚本,这是MI公司独有的语言,是一种类C语言,而QTP生成的是VBscrīpt,从编程能力上,WinRunner更胜一筹,因为它拥有相当丰富的C语言函数库,相对而言QTP则更显得大众化,它面向的是没有太多技术背景和编程经验的测试人员;
4.从适用范围来看:WinRunner比较适用于C/S架构软件,而QTP虽然对于C/S架构的也适用,但对于B/S架构的适用性更剩一筹;
5.QTP8.0具有的一大特性:关键字驱动测试(keyword-driven testing),这点我实践的比较少,理解不是很深,希望能和大家共同讨论;
具体选用那种工具,应该根据公司自身的情况来定。这些只是个人理解,如果有不完整或者不对的地方,欢迎大家跟帖讨论!