HFSoft.Data持久化组件和其他组件性能对比测试
现在没有改版后的组件版本所以暂时用旧版的，由于组件存在的Bug所以导致某些情况不能测试成功,在修改了某些字段类型才能进行测试.测试方法是采用http://www.cnblogs.com/teddyma/archive/2007/07/26/831646.html 的测试代码在基础上添加了HFSoft.Data的测试功能。
测试代码:
public class HFSoftPerformanceTest : IPerformanceTest
{
#region IPerformanceTest 成员
public long ExecuteSmallRead(int repeatTime)
{
System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch sw = new System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch();
sw.Reset();
sw.Start();
Expression exp;
for (int i = 0; i < repeatTime; i++)
{
exp = DB.Categories.CategoryID == 10;
IList<Categories> cast = exp.List<Categories>();
exp = DB.Customers.CustomerID == "10";
IList<Customers> cuses = exp.List<Customers>();
exp = DB.Products.ProductID == 10;
IList<Products> products = exp.List<Products>();
}
sw.Stop();
return sw.ElapsedMilliseconds;
}
public long ExecuteBigRead(int repeatTime)
{
System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch sw = new System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch();
sw.Reset();
sw.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < repeatTime; i++)
{
IList<Categories> cats = DaoContext.List<Categories>(null);
IList<Customers> cuses = DaoContext.List<Customers>(null);
IList<Products> products = DaoContext.List<Products>(null);
}
sw.Stop();
return sw.ElapsedMilliseconds;
}
public long ExecuteWrite(int repeatTime)
{
System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch sw = new System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch();
sw.Reset();
sw.Start();
//...
sw.Stop();
return sw.ElapsedMilliseconds;
}
#endregion
}
测试结果:
Compare small read performance of ADO.NET, NBearV3, NHibernateV1, NBearLite, NBearLite+NBearMapping,HFSoft.
Repeat Time = 2
3 12 4 10 18 3
Repeat Time = 5
10 31 6 26 45 6
Repeat Time = 10
16 57 13 63 87 12
Compare big read performance of ADO.NET, NBearV3, NHibernateV1, NBearLite, NBearLite+NBearMapping,HFSoft
Repeat Time = 2
70 1143 203 76 227 71
Repeat Time = 5
198 3307 468 233 395 189
Repeat Time = 10
453 7103 940 470 905 432
Compare write performance of ADO.NET, NBearV3, NHibernateV1, NBearLite, NBearLite+NBearMapping,HFSoft
Repeat Time = 2
9 40 18 33 36 0
Repeat Time = 5
19 99 50 88 99 0
Repeat Time = 10
155 272 108 286 202 0
由于这版本的持久组件在某些类型转上有问题，所以没有进行写操作测试。从测试的结果可以看到HFSoft持久化组件在读操作上优越于ado.net的代码；当然实际情况并不是如些，只是这段ado.net的代码和使用的DataSet作为载体的原因。等NClay改版完成后再作一个全面的比较测试。
以下是之前版的测试结果:
http://www.cnblogs.com/henryfan/archive/2006/12/10/588264.html
