Java多线程之JUC包：ReentrantReadWriteLock源码学习笔记

若有不正之处请多多谅解，并欢迎批评指正。

请尊重作者劳动成果，转载请标明原文链接：

http://www.cnblogs.com/go2sea/p/5634701.html

 

ReentrantLock提供了标准的互斥操作，但在应用中，我们对一个资源的访问有两种方式：读和写，读操作一般不会影响数据的一致性问题。但如果我们使用ReentrantLock，则在需要在读操作的时候也独占锁，这会导致并发效率大大降低。JUC包提供了读写锁ReentrantReadWriteLock，使得读写锁分离，在上述情境下，应用读写锁相对于使用独占锁，并发性能得到较大提高。

我们先来大致了解一下ReentrantReadWriteLock的性质：

①基本性质：读锁是一个共享锁，写锁是一个独占锁。读锁能同时被多个线程获取，写锁只能被一个线程获取。读锁和写锁不能同时存在。

①重入性：一个线程可以多次重复获取读锁和写锁。

③锁降级：一个线程在已经获取写锁的情况下，可以再次获取读锁，如果线程又释放了写锁，就完成了一次锁降级。

④锁升级：ReentrantReadWriteLock不支持锁升级。一个线程在获取读锁的情况下，如果试图去获取写锁，将会导致死锁（后面会详细说明）。

⑤获取锁中断：提供了可中断的lock方法。

⑥重入数：读锁和写锁的重入上限为65535（所有线程获取的锁的总数，为什么是这个值后面会详细说明）。

⑦公平性：ReentrantReadWriteLock提供了公平&非公平两种工作模式。

 

ReentrantReadWriteLock实现了ReadWriteLock接口：

public interface ReadWriteLock {  
    Lock readLock();  
    Lock writeLock();  
}  

这个接口之有两个方法，分别返回读锁和写锁。ReentrantReadWriteLock定义了两个内部类：readLock&writeLock。

ReentrantReadWriteLock提供了两种自定义的同步器：FairSync&NonfairSync：

　　static final class NonfairSync extends Sync {
        private static final long serialVersionUID = -8159625535654395037L;
        final boolean writerShouldBlock() {
            return false; // writers can always barge
        }
        final boolean readerShouldBlock() {
            return apparentlyFirstQueuedIsExclusive();
        }
    }

    static final class FairSync extends Sync {
        private static final long serialVersionUID = -2274990926593161451L;
        final boolean writerShouldBlock() {
            return hasQueuedPredecessors();
        }
        final boolean readerShouldBlock() {
            return hasQueuedPredecessors();
        }
    }

他们都继承自父类同步器Sync，而他们只定义了writerShouldBlock&readerShouldBlock方法。这两个方法用在获取锁的操作中，表示要获取锁的线程需要到等待队列中，还是可以直接尝试获取。后面我们会详细分析。

在自定义的同步器Sync中，定义了锁数量的记录方式：

        static final int SHARED_SHIFT   = 16;
        static final int SHARED_UNIT    = (1 << SHARED_SHIFT);
        static final int MAX_COUNT      = (1 << SHARED_SHIFT) - 1;
        static final int EXCLUSIVE_MASK = (1 << SHARED_SHIFT) - 1;

        /** Returns the number of shared holds represented in count  */
        static int sharedCount(int c)    { return c >>> SHARED_SHIFT; }
        /** Returns the number of exclusive holds represented in count  */
        static int exclusiveCount(int c) { return c & EXCLUSIVE_MASK; }

可见，ReentrantReadWriteLock用一个32位无符号数记录锁的数量，高16位记录共享锁（读锁）的数量，第16位记录独占锁（写锁）的数量，因此锁的数量上限都是65535。

源代码：

/*
 * ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license terms.
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 */

/*
 *
 *
 *
 *
 *
 * Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166
 * Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at
 * http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
 */

package java.util.concurrent.locks;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.Collection;

/**
 * An implementation of {@link ReadWriteLock} supporting similar
 * semantics to {@link ReentrantLock}.
 * <p>This class has the following properties:
 *
 * <ul>
 * <li><b>Acquisition order</b>
 *
 * <p>This class does not impose a reader or writer preference
 * ordering for lock access.  However, it does support an optional
 * <em>fairness</em> policy.
 *
 * <dl>
 * <dt><b><i>Non-fair mode (default)</i></b>
 * <dd>When constructed as non-fair (the default), the order of entry
 * to the read and write lock is unspecified, subject to reentrancy
 * constraints.  A nonfair lock that is continuously contended may
 * indefinitely postpone one or more reader or writer threads, but
 * will normally have higher throughput than a fair lock.
 *
 * <dt><b><i>Fair mode</i></b>
 * <dd>When constructed as fair, threads contend for entry using an
 * approximately arrival-order policy. When the currently held lock
 * is released, either the longest-waiting single writer thread will
 * be assigned the write lock, or if there is a group of reader threads
 * waiting longer than all waiting writer threads, that group will be
 * assigned the read lock.
 *
 * <p>A thread that tries to acquire a fair read lock (non-reentrantly)
 * will block if either the write lock is held, or there is a waiting
 * writer thread. The thread will not acquire the read lock until
 * after the oldest currently waiting writer thread has acquired and
 * released the write lock. Of course, if a waiting writer abandons
 * its wait, leaving one or more reader threads as the longest waiters
 * in the queue with the write lock free, then those readers will be
 * assigned the read lock.
 *
 * <p>A thread that tries to acquire a fair write lock (non-reentrantly)
 * will block unless both the read lock and write lock are free (which
 * implies there are no waiting threads).  (Note that the non-blocking
 * {@link ReadLock#tryLock()} and {@link WriteLock#tryLock()} methods
 * do not honor this fair setting and will immediately acquire the lock
 * if it is possible, regardless of waiting threads.)
 * <p>
 * </dl>
 *
 * <li><b>Reentrancy</b>
 *
 * <p>This lock allows both readers and writers to reacquire read or
 * write locks in the style of a {@link ReentrantLock}. Non-reentrant
 * readers are not allowed until all write locks held by the writing
 * thread have been released.
 *
 * <p>Additionally, a writer can acquire the read lock, but not
 * vice-versa.  Among other applications, reentrancy can be useful
 * when write locks are held during calls or callbacks to methods that
 * perform reads under read locks.  If a reader tries to acquire the
 * write lock it will never succeed.
 *
 * <li><b>Lock downgrading</b>
 * <p>Reentrancy also allows downgrading from the write lock to a read lock,
 * by acquiring the write lock, then the read lock and then releasing the
 * write lock. However, upgrading from a read lock to the write lock is
 * <b>not</b> possible.
 *
 * <li><b>Interruption of lock acquisition</b>
 * <p>The read lock and write lock both support interruption during lock
 * acquisition.
 *
 * <li><b>{@link Condition} support</b>
 * <p>The write lock provides a {@link Condition} implementation that
 * behaves in the same way, with respect to the write lock, as the
 * {@link Condition} implementation provided by
 * {@link ReentrantLock#newCondition} does for {@link ReentrantLock}.
 * This {@link Condition} can, of course, only be used with the write lock.
 *
 * <p>The read lock does not support a {@link Condition} and
 * {@code readLock().newCondition()} throws
 * {@code UnsupportedOperationException}.
 *
 * <li><b>Instrumentation</b>
 * <p>This class supports methods to determine whether locks
 * are held or contended. These methods are designed for monitoring
 * system state, not for synchronization control.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Serialization of this class behaves in the same way as built-in
 * locks: a deserialized lock is in the unlocked state, regardless of
 * its state when serialized.
 *
 * <p><b>Sample usages</b>. Here is a code sketch showing how to perform
 * lock downgrading after updating a cache (exception handling is
 * particularly tricky when handling multiple locks in a non-nested
 * fashion):
 *
 * <pre> {@code
 * class CachedData {
 *   Object data;
 *   volatile boolean cacheValid;
 *   final ReentrantReadWriteLock rwl = new ReentrantReadWriteLock();
 *
 *   void processCachedData() {
 *     rwl.readLock().lock();
 *     if (!cacheValid) {
 *       // Must release read lock before acquiring write lock
 *       rwl.readLock().unlock();
 *       rwl.writeLock().lock();
 *       try {
 *         // Recheck state because another thread might have
 *         // acquired write lock and changed state before we did.
 *         if (!cacheValid) {
 *           data = ...
 *           cacheValid = true;
 *         }
 *         // Downgrade by acquiring read lock before releasing write lock
 *         rwl.readLock().lock();
 *       } finally {
 *         rwl.writeLock().unlock(); // Unlock write, still hold read
 *       }
 *     }
 *
 *     try {
 *       use(data);
 *     } finally {
 *       rwl.readLock().unlock();
 *     }
 *   }
 * }}</pre>
 *
 * ReentrantReadWriteLocks can be used to improve concurrency in some
 * uses of some kinds of Collections. This is typically worthwhile
 * only when the collections are expected to be large, accessed by
 * more reader threads than writer threads, and entail operations with
 * overhead that outweighs synchronization overhead. For example, here
 * is a class using a TreeMap that is expected to be large and
 * concurrently accessed.
 *
 *  <pre> {@code
 * class RWDictionary {
 *   private final Map<String, Data> m = new TreeMap<String, Data>();
 *   private final ReentrantReadWriteLock rwl = new ReentrantReadWriteLock();
 *   private final Lock r = rwl.readLock();
 *   private final Lock w = rwl.writeLock();
 *
 *   public Data get(String key) {
 *     r.lock();
 *     try { return m.get(key); }
 *     finally { r.unlock(); }
 *   }
 *   public String[] allKeys() {
 *     r.lock();
 *     try { return m.keySet().toArray(); }
 *     finally { r.unlock(); }
 *   }
 *   public Data put(String key, Data value) {
 *     w.lock();
 *     try { return m.put(key, value); }
 *     finally { w.unlock(); }
 *   }
 *   public void clear() {
 *     w.lock();
 *     try { m.clear(); }
 *     finally { w.unlock(); }
 *   }
 * }}</pre>
 *
 * <h3>Implementation Notes</h3>
 *
 * <p>This lock supports a maximum of 65535 recursive write locks
 * and 65535 read locks. Attempts to exceed these limits result in
 * {@link Error} throws from locking methods.
 *
 * @since 1.5
 * @author Doug Lea
 */
public class ReentrantReadWriteLock
        implements ReadWriteLock, java.io.Serializable {
    private static final long serialVersionUID = -6992448646407690164L;
    /** Inner class providing readlock */
    private final ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock readerLock;
    /** Inner class providing writelock */
    private final ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writerLock;
    /** Performs all synchronization mechanics */
    final Sync sync;

    /**
     * Creates a new {@code ReentrantReadWriteLock} with
     * default (nonfair) ordering properties.
     */
    public ReentrantReadWriteLock() {
        this(false);
    }

    /**
     * Creates a new {@code ReentrantReadWriteLock} with
     * the given fairness policy.
     *
     * @param fair {@code true} if this lock should use a fair ordering policy
     */
    public ReentrantReadWriteLock(boolean fair) {
        sync = fair ? new FairSync() : new NonfairSync();
        readerLock = new ReadLock(this);
        writerLock = new WriteLock(this);
    }

    public ReentrantReadWriteLock.WriteLock writeLock() { return writerLock; }
    public ReentrantReadWriteLock.ReadLock  readLock()  { return readerLock; }

    /**
     * Synchronization implementation for ReentrantReadWriteLock.
     * Subclassed into fair and nonfair versions.
     */
    abstract static class Sync extends AbstractQueuedSynchronizer {
        private static final long serialVersionUID = 6317671515068378041L;

        /*
         * Read vs write count extraction constants and functions.
         * Lock state is logically divided into two unsigned shorts:
         * The lower one representing the exclusive (writer) lock hold count,
         * and the upper the shared (reader) hold count.
         */

        static final int SHARED_SHIFT   = 16;
        static final int SHARED_UNIT    = (1 << SHARED_SHIFT);
        static final int MAX_COUNT      = (1 << SHARED_SHIFT) - 1;
        static final int EXCLUSIVE_MASK = (1 << SHARED_SHIFT) - 1;

        /** Returns the number of shared holds represented in count  */
        static int sharedCount(int c)    { return c >>> SHARED_SHIFT; }
        /** Returns the number of exclusive holds represented in count  */
        static int exclusiveCount(int c) { return c & EXCLUSIVE_MASK; }

        /**
         * A counter for per-thread read hold counts.
         * Maintained as a ThreadLocal; cached in cachedHoldCounter
         */
        static final class HoldCounter {
            int count = 0;
            // Use id, not reference, to avoid garbage retention
            final long tid = getThreadId(Thread.currentThread());
        }

        /**
         * ThreadLocal subclass. Easiest to explicitly define for sake
         * of deserialization mechanics.
         */
        static final class ThreadLocalHoldCounter
            extends ThreadLocal<HoldCounter> {
            public HoldCounter initialValue() {
                return new HoldCounter();
            }
        }

        /**
         * The number of reentrant read locks held by current thread.
         * Initialized only in constructor and readObject.
         * Removed whenever a thread's read hold count drops to 0.
         */
        private transient ThreadLocalHoldCounter readHolds;

        /**
         * The hold count of the last thread to successfully acquire
         * readLock. This saves ThreadLocal lookup in the common case
         * where the next thread to release is the last one to
         * acquire. This is non-volatile since it is just used
         * as a heuristic, and would be great for threads to cache.
         *
         * <p>Can outlive the Thread for which it is caching the read
         * hold count, but avoids garbage retention by not retaining a
         * reference to the Thread.
         *
         * <p>Accessed via a benign data race; relies on the memory
         * model's final field and out-of-thin-air guarantees.
         */
        private transient HoldCounter cachedHoldCounter;

        /**
         * firstReader is the first thread to have acquired the read lock.
         * firstReaderHoldCount is firstReader's hold count.
         *
         * <p>More precisely, firstReader is the unique thread that last
         * changed the shared count from 0 to 1, and has not released the
         * read lock since then; null if there is no such thread.
         *
         * <p>Cannot cause garbage retention unless the thread terminated
         * without relinquishing its read locks, since tryReleaseShared
         * sets it to null.
         *
         * <p>Accessed via a benign data race; relies on the memory
         * model's out-of-thin-air guarantees for references.
         *
         * <p>This allows tracking of read holds for uncontended read
         * locks to be very cheap.
         */
        private transient Thread firstReader = null;
        private transient int firstReaderHoldCount;

        Sync() {
            readHolds = new ThreadLocalHoldCounter();
            setState(getState()); // ensures visibility of readHolds
        }

        /*
         * Acquires and releases use the same code for fair and
         * nonfair locks, but differ in whether/how they allow barging
         * when queues are non-empty.
         */

        /**
         * Returns true if the current thread, when trying to acquire
         * the read lock, and otherwise eligible to do so, should block
         * because of policy for overtaking other waiting threads.
         */
        abstract boolean readerShouldBlock();

        /**
         * Returns true if the current thread, when trying to acquire
         * the write lock, and otherwise eligible to do so, should block
         * because of policy for overtaking other waiting threads.
         */
        abstract boolean writerShouldBlock();

        /*
         * Note that tryRelease and tryAcquire can be called by
         * Conditions. So it is possible that their arguments contain
         * both read and write holds that are all released during a
         * condition wait and re-established in tryAcquire.
         */

        protected final boolean tryRelease(int releases) {
            if (!isHeldExclusively())
                throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
            int nextc = getState() - releases;
            boolean free = exclusiveCount(nextc) == 0;
            if (free)
                setExclusiveOwnerThread(null);
            setState(nextc);
            return free;
        }

        protected final boolean tryAcquire(int acquires) {
            /*
             * Walkthrough:
             * 1. If read count nonzero or write count nonzero
             *    and owner is a different thread, fail.
             * 2. If count would saturate, fail. (This can only
             *    happen if count is already nonzero.)
             * 3. Otherwise, this thread is eligible for lock if
             *    it is either a reentrant acquire or
             *    queue policy allows it. If so, update state
             *    and set owner.
             */
            Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
            int c = getState();
            int w = exclusiveCount(c);
            if (c != 0) {
                // (Note: if c != 0 and w == 0 then shared count != 0)
                if (w == 0 || current != getExclusiveOwnerThread())
                    return false;
                if (w + exclusiveCount(acquires) > MAX_COUNT)
                    throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
                // Reentrant acquire
                setState(c + acquires);
                return true;
            }
            if (writerShouldBlock() ||
                !compareAndSetState(c, c + acquires))
                return false;
            setExclusiveOwnerThread(current);
            return true;
        }

        protected final boolean tryReleaseShared(int unused) {
            Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
            if (firstReader == current) {
                // assert firstReaderHoldCount > 0;
                if (firstReaderHoldCount == 1)
                    firstReader = null;
                else
                    firstReaderHoldCount--;
            } else {
                HoldCounter rh = cachedHoldCounter;
                if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
                    rh = readHolds.get();
                int count = rh.count;
                if (count <= 1) {
                    readHolds.remove();
                    if (count <= 0)
                        throw unmatchedUnlockException();
                }
                --rh.count;
            }
            for (;;) {
                int c = getState();
                int nextc = c - SHARED_UNIT;
                if (compareAndSetState(c, nextc))
                    // Releasing the read lock has no effect on readers,
                    // but it may allow waiting writers to proceed if
                    // both read and write locks are now free.
                    return nextc == 0;
            }
        }

        private IllegalMonitorStateException unmatchedUnlockException() {
            return new IllegalMonitorStateException(
                "attempt to unlock read lock, not locked by current thread");
        }

        protected final int tryAcquireShared(int unused) {
            /*
             * Walkthrough:
             * 1. If write lock held by another thread, fail.
             * 2. Otherwise, this thread is eligible for
             *    lock wrt state, so ask if it should block
             *    because of queue policy. If not, try
             *    to grant by CASing state and updating count.
             *    Note that step does not check for reentrant
             *    acquires, which is postponed to full version
             *    to avoid having to check hold count in
             *    the more typical non-reentrant case.
             * 3. If step 2 fails either because thread
             *    apparently not eligible or CAS fails or count
             *    saturated, chain to version with full retry loop.
             */
            Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
            int c = getState();
            if (exclusiveCount(c) != 0 &&
                getExclusiveOwnerThread() != current)
                return -1;
            int r = sharedCount(c);
            if (!readerShouldBlock() &&
                r < MAX_COUNT &&
                compareAndSetState(c, c + SHARED_UNIT)) {
                if (r == 0) {
                    firstReader = current;
                    firstReaderHoldCount = 1;
                } else if (firstReader == current) {
                    firstReaderHoldCount++;
                } else {
                    HoldCounter rh = cachedHoldCounter;
                    if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
                        cachedHoldCounter = rh = readHolds.get();
                    else if (rh.count == 0)
                        readHolds.set(rh);
                    rh.count++;
                }
                return 1;
            }
            return fullTryAcquireShared(current);
        }

        /**
         * Full version of acquire for reads, that handles CAS misses
         * and reentrant reads not dealt with in tryAcquireShared.
         */
        final int fullTryAcquireShared(Thread current) {
            /*
             * This code is in part redundant with that in
             * tryAcquireShared but is simpler overall by not
             * complicating tryAcquireShared with interactions between
             * retries and lazily reading hold counts.
             */
            HoldCounter rh = null;
            for (;;) {
                int c = getState();
                if (exclusiveCount(c) != 0) {
                    if (getExclusiveOwnerThread() != current)
                        return -1;
                    // else we hold the exclusive lock; blocking here
                    // would cause deadlock.
                } else if (readerShouldBlock()) {
                    // Make sure we're not acquiring read lock reentrantly
                    if (firstReader == current) {
                        // assert firstReaderHoldCount > 0;
                    } else {
                        if (rh == null) {
                            rh = cachedHoldCounter;
                            if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current)) {
                                rh = readHolds.get();
                                if (rh.count == 0)
                                    readHolds.remove();
                            }
                        }
                        if (rh.count == 0)
                            return -1;
                    }
                }
                if (sharedCount(c) == MAX_COUNT)
                    throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
                if (compareAndSetState(c, c + SHARED_UNIT)) {
                    if (sharedCount(c) == 0) {
                        firstReader = current;
                        firstReaderHoldCount = 1;
                    } else if (firstReader == current) {
                        firstReaderHoldCount++;
                    } else {
                        if (rh == null)
                            rh = cachedHoldCounter;
                        if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
                            rh = readHolds.get();
                        else if (rh.count == 0)
                            readHolds.set(rh);
                        rh.count++;
                        cachedHoldCounter = rh; // cache for release
                    }
                    return 1;
                }
            }
        }

        /**
         * Performs tryLock for write, enabling barging in both modes.
         * This is identical in effect to tryAcquire except for lack
         * of calls to writerShouldBlock.
         */
        final boolean tryWriteLock() {
            Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
            int c = getState();
            if (c != 0) {
                int w = exclusiveCount(c);
                if (w == 0 || current != getExclusiveOwnerThread())
                    return false;
                if (w == MAX_COUNT)
                    throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
            }
            if (!compareAndSetState(c, c + 1))
                return false;
            setExclusiveOwnerThread(current);
            return true;
        }

        /**
         * Performs tryLock for read, enabling barging in both modes.
         * This is identical in effect to tryAcquireShared except for
         * lack of calls to readerShouldBlock.
         */
        final boolean tryReadLock() {
            Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
            for (;;) {
                int c = getState();
                if (exclusiveCount(c) != 0 &&
                    getExclusiveOwnerThread() != current)
                    return false;
                int r = sharedCount(c);
                if (r == MAX_COUNT)
                    throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
                if (compareAndSetState(c, c + SHARED_UNIT)) {
                    if (r == 0) {
                        firstReader = current;
                        firstReaderHoldCount = 1;
                    } else if (firstReader == current) {
                        firstReaderHoldCount++;
                    } else {
                        HoldCounter rh = cachedHoldCounter;
                        if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
                            cachedHoldCounter = rh = readHolds.get();
                        else if (rh.count == 0)
                            readHolds.set(rh);
                        rh.count++;
                    }
                    return true;
                }
            }
        }

        protected final boolean isHeldExclusively() {
            // While we must in general read state before owner,
            // we don't need to do so to check if current thread is owner
            return getExclusiveOwnerThread() == Thread.currentThread();
        }

        // Methods relayed to outer class

        final ConditionObject newCondition() {
            return new ConditionObject();
        }

        final Thread getOwner() {
            // Must read state before owner to ensure memory consistency
            return ((exclusiveCount(getState()) == 0) ?
                    null :
                    getExclusiveOwnerThread());
        }

        final int getReadLockCount() {
            return sharedCount(getState());
        }

        final boolean isWriteLocked() {
            return exclusiveCount(getState()) != 0;
        }

        final int getWriteHoldCount() {
            return isHeldExclusively() ? exclusiveCount(getState()) : 0;
        }

        final int getReadHoldCount() {
            if (getReadLockCount() == 0)
                return 0;

            Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
            if (firstReader == current)
                return firstReaderHoldCount;

            HoldCounter rh = cachedHoldCounter;
            if (rh != null && rh.tid == getThreadId(current))
                return rh.count;

            int count = readHolds.get().count;
            if (count == 0) readHolds.remove();
            return count;
        }

        /**
         * Reconstitutes the instance from a stream (that is, deserializes it).
         */
        private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream s)
            throws java.io.IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
            s.defaultReadObject();
            readHolds = new ThreadLocalHoldCounter();
            setState(0); // reset to unlocked state
        }

        final int getCount() { return getState(); }
    }

    /**
     * Nonfair version of Sync
     */
    static final class NonfairSync extends Sync {
        private static final long serialVersionUID = -8159625535654395037L;
        final boolean writerShouldBlock() {
            return false; // writers can always barge
        }
        final boolean readerShouldBlock() {
            /* As a heuristic to avoid indefinite writer starvation,
             * block if the thread that momentarily appears to be head
             * of queue, if one exists, is a waiting writer.  This is
             * only a probabilistic effect since a new reader will not
             * block if there is a waiting writer behind other enabled
             * readers that have not yet drained from the queue.
             */
            return apparentlyFirstQueuedIsExclusive();
        }
    }

    /**
     * Fair version of Sync
     */
    static final class FairSync extends Sync {
        private static final long serialVersionUID = -2274990926593161451L;
        final boolean writerShouldBlock() {
            return hasQueuedPredecessors();
        }
        final boolean readerShouldBlock() {
            return hasQueuedPredecessors();
        }
    }

    /**
     * The lock returned by method {@link ReentrantReadWriteLock#readLock}.
     */
    public static class ReadLock implements Lock, java.io.Serializable {
        private static final long serialVersionUID = -5992448646407690164L;
        private final Sync sync;

        /**
         * Constructor for use by subclasses
         *
         * @param lock the outer lock object
         * @throws NullPointerException if the lock is null
         */
        protected ReadLock(ReentrantReadWriteLock lock) {
            sync = lock.sync;
        }

        /**
         * Acquires the read lock.
         *
         * <p>Acquires the read lock if the write lock is not held by
         * another thread and returns immediately.
         *
         * <p>If the write lock is held by another thread then
         * the current thread becomes disabled for thread scheduling
         * purposes and lies dormant until the read lock has been acquired.
         */
        public void lock() {
            sync.acquireShared(1);
        }

        /**
         * Acquires the read lock unless the current thread is
         * {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupted}.
         *
         * <p>Acquires the read lock if the write lock is not held
         * by another thread and returns immediately.
         *
         * <p>If the write lock is held by another thread then the
         * current thread becomes disabled for thread scheduling
         * purposes and lies dormant until one of two things happens:
         *
         * <ul>
         *
         * <li>The read lock is acquired by the current thread; or
         *
         * <li>Some other thread {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupts}
         * the current thread.
         *
         * </ul>
         *
         * <p>If the current thread:
         *
         * <ul>
         *
         * <li>has its interrupted status set on entry to this method; or
         *
         * <li>is {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupted} while
         * acquiring the read lock,
         *
         * </ul>
         *
         * then {@link InterruptedException} is thrown and the current
         * thread's interrupted status is cleared.
         *
         * <p>In this implementation, as this method is an explicit
         * interruption point, preference is given to responding to
         * the interrupt over normal or reentrant acquisition of the
         * lock.
         *
         * @throws InterruptedException if the current thread is interrupted
         */
        public void lockInterruptibly() throws InterruptedException {
            sync.acquireSharedInterruptibly(1);
        }

        /**
         * Acquires the read lock only if the write lock is not held by
         * another thread at the time of invocation.
         *
         * <p>Acquires the read lock if the write lock is not held by
         * another thread and returns immediately with the value
         * {@code true}. Even when this lock has been set to use a
         * fair ordering policy, a call to {@code tryLock()}
         * <em>will</em> immediately acquire the read lock if it is
         * available, whether or not other threads are currently
         * waiting for the read lock.  This &quot;barging&quot; behavior
         * can be useful in certain circumstances, even though it
         * breaks fairness. If you want to honor the fairness setting
         * for this lock, then use {@link #tryLock(long, TimeUnit)
         * tryLock(0, TimeUnit.SECONDS) } which is almost equivalent
         * (it also detects interruption).
         *
         * <p>If the write lock is held by another thread then
         * this method will return immediately with the value
         * {@code false}.
         *
         * @return {@code true} if the read lock was acquired
         */
        public boolean tryLock() {
            return sync.tryReadLock();
        }

        /**
         * Acquires the read lock if the write lock is not held by
         * another thread within the given waiting time and the
         * current thread has not been {@linkplain Thread#interrupt
         * interrupted}.
         *
         * <p>Acquires the read lock if the write lock is not held by
         * another thread and returns immediately with the value
         * {@code true}. If this lock has been set to use a fair
         * ordering policy then an available lock <em>will not</em> be
         * acquired if any other threads are waiting for the
         * lock. This is in contrast to the {@link #tryLock()}
         * method. If you want a timed {@code tryLock} that does
         * permit barging on a fair lock then combine the timed and
         * un-timed forms together:
         *
         *  <pre> {@code
         * if (lock.tryLock() ||
         *     lock.tryLock(timeout, unit)) {
         *   ...
         * }}</pre>
         *
         * <p>If the write lock is held by another thread then the
         * current thread becomes disabled for thread scheduling
         * purposes and lies dormant until one of three things happens:
         *
         * <ul>
         *
         * <li>The read lock is acquired by the current thread; or
         *
         * <li>Some other thread {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupts}
         * the current thread; or
         *
         * <li>The specified waiting time elapses.
         *
         * </ul>
         *
         * <p>If the read lock is acquired then the value {@code true} is
         * returned.
         *
         * <p>If the current thread:
         *
         * <ul>
         *
         * <li>has its interrupted status set on entry to this method; or
         *
         * <li>is {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupted} while
         * acquiring the read lock,
         *
         * </ul> then {@link InterruptedException} is thrown and the
         * current thread's interrupted status is cleared.
         *
         * <p>If the specified waiting time elapses then the value
         * {@code false} is returned.  If the time is less than or
         * equal to zero, the method will not wait at all.
         *
         * <p>In this implementation, as this method is an explicit
         * interruption point, preference is given to responding to
         * the interrupt over normal or reentrant acquisition of the
         * lock, and over reporting the elapse of the waiting time.
         *
         * @param timeout the time to wait for the read lock
         * @param unit the time unit of the timeout argument
         * @return {@code true} if the read lock was acquired
         * @throws InterruptedException if the current thread is interrupted
         * @throws NullPointerException if the time unit is null
         */
        public boolean tryLock(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
                throws InterruptedException {
            return sync.tryAcquireSharedNanos(1, unit.toNanos(timeout));
        }

        /**
         * Attempts to release this lock.
         *
         * <p>If the number of readers is now zero then the lock
         * is made available for write lock attempts.
         */
        public void unlock() {
            sync.releaseShared(1);
        }

        /**
         * Throws {@code UnsupportedOperationException} because
         * {@code ReadLocks} do not support conditions.
         *
         * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
         */
        public Condition newCondition() {
            throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
        }

        /**
         * Returns a string identifying this lock, as well as its lock state.
         * The state, in brackets, includes the String {@code "Read locks ="}
         * followed by the number of held read locks.
         *
         * @return a string identifying this lock, as well as its lock state
         */
        public String toString() {
            int r = sync.getReadLockCount();
            return super.toString() +
                "[Read locks = " + r + "]";
        }
    }

    /**
     * The lock returned by method {@link ReentrantReadWriteLock#writeLock}.
     */
    public static class WriteLock implements Lock, java.io.Serializable {
        private static final long serialVersionUID = -4992448646407690164L;
        private final Sync sync;

        /**
         * Constructor for use by subclasses
         *
         * @param lock the outer lock object
         * @throws NullPointerException if the lock is null
         */
        protected WriteLock(ReentrantReadWriteLock lock) {
            sync = lock.sync;
        }

        /**
         * Acquires the write lock.
         *
         * <p>Acquires the write lock if neither the read nor write lock
         * are held by another thread
         * and returns immediately, setting the write lock hold count to
         * one.
         *
         * <p>If the current thread already holds the write lock then the
         * hold count is incremented by one and the method returns
         * immediately.
         *
         * <p>If the lock is held by another thread then the current
         * thread becomes disabled for thread scheduling purposes and
         * lies dormant until the write lock has been acquired, at which
         * time the write lock hold count is set to one.
         */
        public void lock() {
            sync.acquire(1);
        }

        /**
         * Acquires the write lock unless the current thread is
         * {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupted}.
         *
         * <p>Acquires the write lock if neither the read nor write lock
         * are held by another thread
         * and returns immediately, setting the write lock hold count to
         * one.
         *
         * <p>If the current thread already holds this lock then the
         * hold count is incremented by one and the method returns
         * immediately.
         *
         * <p>If the lock is held by another thread then the current
         * thread becomes disabled for thread scheduling purposes and
         * lies dormant until one of two things happens:
         *
         * <ul>
         *
         * <li>The write lock is acquired by the current thread; or
         *
         * <li>Some other thread {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupts}
         * the current thread.
         *
         * </ul>
         *
         * <p>If the write lock is acquired by the current thread then the
         * lock hold count is set to one.
         *
         * <p>If the current thread:
         *
         * <ul>
         *
         * <li>has its interrupted status set on entry to this method;
         * or
         *
         * <li>is {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupted} while
         * acquiring the write lock,
         *
         * </ul>
         *
         * then {@link InterruptedException} is thrown and the current
         * thread's interrupted status is cleared.
         *
         * <p>In this implementation, as this method is an explicit
         * interruption point, preference is given to responding to
         * the interrupt over normal or reentrant acquisition of the
         * lock.
         *
         * @throws InterruptedException if the current thread is interrupted
         */
        public void lockInterruptibly() throws InterruptedException {
            sync.acquireInterruptibly(1);
        }

        /**
         * Acquires the write lock only if it is not held by another thread
         * at the time of invocation.
         *
         * <p>Acquires the write lock if neither the read nor write lock
         * are held by another thread
         * and returns immediately with the value {@code true},
         * setting the write lock hold count to one. Even when this lock has
         * been set to use a fair ordering policy, a call to
         * {@code tryLock()} <em>will</em> immediately acquire the
         * lock if it is available, whether or not other threads are
         * currently waiting for the write lock.  This &quot;barging&quot;
         * behavior can be useful in certain circumstances, even
         * though it breaks fairness. If you want to honor the
         * fairness setting for this lock, then use {@link
         * #tryLock(long, TimeUnit) tryLock(0, TimeUnit.SECONDS) }
         * which is almost equivalent (it also detects interruption).
         *
         * <p>If the current thread already holds this lock then the
         * hold count is incremented by one and the method returns
         * {@code true}.
         *
         * <p>If the lock is held by another thread then this method
         * will return immediately with the value {@code false}.
         *
         * @return {@code true} if the lock was free and was acquired
         * by the current thread, or the write lock was already held
         * by the current thread; and {@code false} otherwise.
         */
        public boolean tryLock( ) {
            return sync.tryWriteLock();
        }

        /**
         * Acquires the write lock if it is not held by another thread
         * within the given waiting time and the current thread has
         * not been {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupted}.
         *
         * <p>Acquires the write lock if neither the read nor write lock
         * are held by another thread
         * and returns immediately with the value {@code true},
         * setting the write lock hold count to one. If this lock has been
         * set to use a fair ordering policy then an available lock
         * <em>will not</em> be acquired if any other threads are
         * waiting for the write lock. This is in contrast to the {@link
         * #tryLock()} method. If you want a timed {@code tryLock}
         * that does permit barging on a fair lock then combine the
         * timed and un-timed forms together:
         *
         *  <pre> {@code
         * if (lock.tryLock() ||
         *     lock.tryLock(timeout, unit)) {
         *   ...
         * }}</pre>
         *
         * <p>If the current thread already holds this lock then the
         * hold count is incremented by one and the method returns
         * {@code true}.
         *
         * <p>If the lock is held by another thread then the current
         * thread becomes disabled for thread scheduling purposes and
         * lies dormant until one of three things happens:
         *
         * <ul>
         *
         * <li>The write lock is acquired by the current thread; or
         *
         * <li>Some other thread {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupts}
         * the current thread; or
         *
         * <li>The specified waiting time elapses
         *
         * </ul>
         *
         * <p>If the write lock is acquired then the value {@code true} is
         * returned and the write lock hold count is set to one.
         *
         * <p>If the current thread:
         *
         * <ul>
         *
         * <li>has its interrupted status set on entry to this method;
         * or
         *
         * <li>is {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupted} while
         * acquiring the write lock,
         *
         * </ul>
         *
         * then {@link InterruptedException} is thrown and the current
         * thread's interrupted status is cleared.
         *
         * <p>If the specified waiting time elapses then the value
         * {@code false} is returned.  If the time is less than or
         * equal to zero, the method will not wait at all.
         *
         * <p>In this implementation, as this method is an explicit
         * interruption point, preference is given to responding to
         * the interrupt over normal or reentrant acquisition of the
         * lock, and over reporting the elapse of the waiting time.
         *
         * @param timeout the time to wait for the write lock
         * @param unit the time unit of the timeout argument
         *
         * @return {@code true} if the lock was free and was acquired
         * by the current thread, or the write lock was already held by the
         * current thread; and {@code false} if the waiting time
         * elapsed before the lock could be acquired.
         *
         * @throws InterruptedException if the current thread is interrupted
         * @throws NullPointerException if the time unit is null
         */
        public boolean tryLock(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
                throws InterruptedException {
            return sync.tryAcquireNanos(1, unit.toNanos(timeout));
        }

        /**
         * Attempts to release this lock.
         *
         * <p>If the current thread is the holder of this lock then
         * the hold count is decremented. If the hold count is now
         * zero then the lock is released.  If the current thread is
         * not the holder of this lock then {@link
         * IllegalMonitorStateException} is thrown.
         *
         * @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if the current thread does not
         * hold this lock
         */
        public void unlock() {
            sync.release(1);
        }

        /**
         * Returns a {@link Condition} instance for use with this
         * {@link Lock} instance.
         * <p>The returned {@link Condition} instance supports the same
         * usages as do the {@link Object} monitor methods ({@link
         * Object#wait() wait}, {@link Object#notify notify}, and {@link
         * Object#notifyAll notifyAll}) when used with the built-in
         * monitor lock.
         *
         * <ul>
         *
         * <li>If this write lock is not held when any {@link
         * Condition} method is called then an {@link
         * IllegalMonitorStateException} is thrown.  (Read locks are
         * held independently of write locks, so are not checked or
         * affected. However it is essentially always an error to
         * invoke a condition waiting method when the current thread
         * has also acquired read locks, since other threads that
         * could unblock it will not be able to acquire the write
         * lock.)
         *
         * <li>When the condition {@linkplain Condition#await() waiting}
         * methods are called the write lock is released and, before
         * they return, the write lock is reacquired and the lock hold
         * count restored to what it was when the method was called.
         *
         * <li>If a thread is {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupted} while
         * waiting then the wait will terminate, an {@link
         * InterruptedException} will be thrown, and the thread's
         * interrupted status will be cleared.
         *
         * <li> Waiting threads are signalled in FIFO order.
         *
         * <li>The ordering of lock reacquisition for threads returning
         * from waiting methods is the same as for threads initially
         * acquiring the lock, which is in the default case not specified,
         * but for <em>fair</em> locks favors those threads that have been
         * waiting the longest.
         *
         * </ul>
         *
         * @return the Condition object
         */
        public Condition newCondition() {
            return sync.newCondition();
        }

        /**
         * Returns a string identifying this lock, as well as its lock
         * state.  The state, in brackets includes either the String
         * {@code "Unlocked"} or the String {@code "Locked by"}
         * followed by the {@linkplain Thread#getName name} of the owning thread.
         *
         * @return a string identifying this lock, as well as its lock state
         */
        public String toString() {
            Thread o = sync.getOwner();
            return super.toString() + ((o == null) ?
                                       "[Unlocked]" :
                                       "[Locked by thread " + o.getName() + "]");
        }

        /**
         * Queries if this write lock is held by the current thread.
         * Identical in effect to {@link
         * ReentrantReadWriteLock#isWriteLockedByCurrentThread}.
         *
         * @return {@code true} if the current thread holds this lock and
         *         {@code false} otherwise
         * @since 1.6
         */
        public boolean isHeldByCurrentThread() {
            return sync.isHeldExclusively();
        }

        /**
         * Queries the number of holds on this write lock by the current
         * thread.  A thread has a hold on a lock for each lock action
         * that is not matched by an unlock action.  Identical in effect
         * to {@link ReentrantReadWriteLock#getWriteHoldCount}.
         *
         * @return the number of holds on this lock by the current thread,
         *         or zero if this lock is not held by the current thread
         * @since 1.6
         */
        public int getHoldCount() {
            return sync.getWriteHoldCount();
        }
    }

    // Instrumentation and status

    /**
     * Returns {@code true} if this lock has fairness set true.
     *
     * @return {@code true} if this lock has fairness set true
     */
    public final boolean isFair() {
        return sync instanceof FairSync;
    }

    /**
     * Returns the thread that currently owns the write lock, or
     * {@code null} if not owned. When this method is called by a
     * thread that is not the owner, the return value reflects a
     * best-effort approximation of current lock status. For example,
     * the owner may be momentarily {@code null} even if there are
     * threads trying to acquire the lock but have not yet done so.
     * This method is designed to facilitate construction of
     * subclasses that provide more extensive lock monitoring
     * facilities.
     *
     * @return the owner, or {@code null} if not owned
     */
    protected Thread getOwner() {
        return sync.getOwner();
    }

    /**
     * Queries the number of read locks held for this lock. This
     * method is designed for use in monitoring system state, not for
     * synchronization control.
     * @return the number of read locks held
     */
    public int getReadLockCount() {
        return sync.getReadLockCount();
    }

    /**
     * Queries if the write lock is held by any thread. This method is
     * designed for use in monitoring system state, not for
     * synchronization control.
     *
     * @return {@code true} if any thread holds the write lock and
     *         {@code false} otherwise
     */
    public boolean isWriteLocked() {
        return sync.isWriteLocked();
    }

    /**
     * Queries if the write lock is held by the current thread.
     *
     * @return {@code true} if the current thread holds the write lock and
     *         {@code false} otherwise
     */
    public boolean isWriteLockedByCurrentThread() {
        return sync.isHeldExclusively();
    }

    /**
     * Queries the number of reentrant write holds on this lock by the
     * current thread.  A writer thread has a hold on a lock for
     * each lock action that is not matched by an unlock action.
     *
     * @return the number of holds on the write lock by the current thread,
     *         or zero if the write lock is not held by the current thread
     */
    public int getWriteHoldCount() {
        return sync.getWriteHoldCount();
    }

    /**
     * Queries the number of reentrant read holds on this lock by the
     * current thread.  A reader thread has a hold on a lock for
     * each lock action that is not matched by an unlock action.
     *
     * @return the number of holds on the read lock by the current thread,
     *         or zero if the read lock is not held by the current thread
     * @since 1.6
     */
    public int getReadHoldCount() {
        return sync.getReadHoldCount();
    }

    /**
     * Returns a collection containing threads that may be waiting to
     * acquire the write lock.  Because the actual set of threads may
     * change dynamically while constructing this result, the returned
     * collection is only a best-effort estimate.  The elements of the
     * returned collection are in no particular order.  This method is
     * designed to facilitate construction of subclasses that provide
     * more extensive lock monitoring facilities.
     *
     * @return the collection of threads
     */
    protected Collection<Thread> getQueuedWriterThreads() {
        return sync.getExclusiveQueuedThreads();
    }

    /**
     * Returns a collection containing threads that may be waiting to
     * acquire the read lock.  Because the actual set of threads may
     * change dynamically while constructing this result, the returned
     * collection is only a best-effort estimate.  The elements of the
     * returned collection are in no particular order.  This method is
     * designed to facilitate construction of subclasses that provide
     * more extensive lock monitoring facilities.
     *
     * @return the collection of threads
     */
    protected Collection<Thread> getQueuedReaderThreads() {
        return sync.getSharedQueuedThreads();
    }

    /**
     * Queries whether any threads are waiting to acquire the read or
     * write lock. Note that because cancellations may occur at any
     * time, a {@code true} return does not guarantee that any other
     * thread will ever acquire a lock.  This method is designed
     * primarily for use in monitoring of the system state.
     *
     * @return {@code true} if there may be other threads waiting to
     *         acquire the lock
     */
    public final boolean hasQueuedThreads() {
        return sync.hasQueuedThreads();
    }

    /**
     * Queries whether the given thread is waiting to acquire either
     * the read or write lock. Note that because cancellations may
     * occur at any time, a {@code true} return does not guarantee
     * that this thread will ever acquire a lock.  This method is
     * designed primarily for use in monitoring of the system state.
     *
     * @param thread the thread
     * @return {@code true} if the given thread is queued waiting for this lock
     * @throws NullPointerException if the thread is null
     */
    public final boolean hasQueuedThread(Thread thread) {
        return sync.isQueued(thread);
    }

    /**
     * Returns an estimate of the number of threads waiting to acquire
     * either the read or write lock.  The value is only an estimate
     * because the number of threads may change dynamically while this
     * method traverses internal data structures.  This method is
     * designed for use in monitoring of the system state, not for
     * synchronization control.
     *
     * @return the estimated number of threads waiting for this lock
     */
    public final int getQueueLength() {
        return sync.getQueueLength();
    }

    /**
     * Returns a collection containing threads that may be waiting to
     * acquire either the read or write lock.  Because the actual set
     * of threads may change dynamically while constructing this
     * result, the returned collection is only a best-effort estimate.
     * The elements of the returned collection are in no particular
     * order.  This method is designed to facilitate construction of
     * subclasses that provide more extensive monitoring facilities.
     *
     * @return the collection of threads
     */
    protected Collection<Thread> getQueuedThreads() {
        return sync.getQueuedThreads();
    }

    /**
     * Queries whether any threads are waiting on the given condition
     * associated with the write lock. Note that because timeouts and
     * interrupts may occur at any time, a {@code true} return does
     * not guarantee that a future {@code signal} will awaken any
     * threads.  This method is designed primarily for use in
     * monitoring of the system state.
     *
     * @param condition the condition
     * @return {@code true} if there are any waiting threads
     * @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if this lock is not held
     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the given condition is
     *         not associated with this lock
     * @throws NullPointerException if the condition is null
     */
    public boolean hasWaiters(Condition condition) {
        if (condition == null)
            throw new NullPointerException();
        if (!(condition instanceof AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.ConditionObject))
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("not owner");
        return sync.hasWaiters((AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.ConditionObject)condition);
    }

    /**
     * Returns an estimate of the number of threads waiting on the
     * given condition associated with the write lock. Note that because
     * timeouts and interrupts may occur at any time, the estimate
     * serves only as an upper bound on the actual number of waiters.
     * This method is designed for use in monitoring of the system
     * state, not for synchronization control.
     *
     * @param condition the condition
     * @return the estimated number of waiting threads
     * @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if this lock is not held
     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the given condition is
     *         not associated with this lock
     * @throws NullPointerException if the condition is null
     */
    public int getWaitQueueLength(Condition condition) {
        if (condition == null)
            throw new NullPointerException();
        if (!(condition instanceof AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.ConditionObject))
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("not owner");
        return sync.getWaitQueueLength((AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.ConditionObject)condition);
    }

    /**
     * Returns a collection containing those threads that may be
     * waiting on the given condition associated with the write lock.
     * Because the actual set of threads may change dynamically while
     * constructing this result, the returned collection is only a
     * best-effort estimate. The elements of the returned collection
     * are in no particular order.  This method is designed to
     * facilitate construction of subclasses that provide more
     * extensive condition monitoring facilities.
     *
     * @param condition the condition
     * @return the collection of threads
     * @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if this lock is not held
     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the given condition is
     *         not associated with this lock
     * @throws NullPointerException if the condition is null
     */
    protected Collection<Thread> getWaitingThreads(Condition condition) {
        if (condition == null)
            throw new NullPointerException();
        if (!(condition instanceof AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.ConditionObject))
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("not owner");
        return sync.getWaitingThreads((AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.ConditionObject)condition);
    }

    /**
     * Returns a string identifying this lock, as well as its lock state.
     * The state, in brackets, includes the String {@code "Write locks ="}
     * followed by the number of reentrantly held write locks, and the
     * String {@code "Read locks ="} followed by the number of held
     * read locks.
     *
     * @return a string identifying this lock, as well as its lock state
     */
    public String toString() {
        int c = sync.getCount();
        int w = Sync.exclusiveCount(c);
        int r = Sync.sharedCount(c);

        return super.toString() +
            "[Write locks = " + w + ", Read locks = " + r + "]";
    }

    /**
     * Returns the thread id for the given thread.  We must access
     * this directly rather than via method Thread.getId() because
     * getId() is not final, and has been known to be overridden in
     * ways that do not preserve unique mappings.
     */
    static final long getThreadId(Thread thread) {
        return UNSAFE.getLongVolatile(thread, TID_OFFSET);
    }

    // Unsafe mechanics
    private static final sun.misc.Unsafe UNSAFE;
    private static final long TID_OFFSET;
    static {
        try {
            UNSAFE = sun.misc.Unsafe.getUnsafe();
            Class<?> tk = Thread.class;
            TID_OFFSET = UNSAFE.objectFieldOffset
                (tk.getDeclaredField("tid"));
        } catch (Exception e) {
            throw new Error(e);
        }
    }

}

可以看到，相对于JUC包提供的其他锁，ReentrantReadWriteLock的代码量还是比较大的。下面，我们就来分析一下读写锁的工作过程。

一、写锁 

1、lock 获取写锁

        public void lock() {
            sync.acquire(1);
        }

跟我们以前分析的独占锁ReentrantLock一样，lock方法调用AQS的acquire方法：

    public final void acquire(int arg) {
        if (!tryAcquire(arg) &&
            acquireQueued(addWaiter(Node.EXCLUSIVE), arg))
            selfInterrupt();
    }

acquire方法已经在笔者之前的另一篇博文AQS源码学习笔记中详细介绍，不再赘述。我么这里重点关注自定义同步器Sync重写的tryAcquire方法： 

        protected final boolean tryAcquire(int acquires) {
            /*
             * Walkthrough:
             * 1. If read count nonzero or write count nonzero
             *    and owner is a different thread, fail.
             * 2. If count would saturate, fail. (This can only
             *    happen if count is already nonzero.)
             * 3. Otherwise, this thread is eligible for lock if
             *    it is either a reentrant acquire or
             *    queue policy allows it. If so, update state
             *    and set owner.
             */
            Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
            int c = getState();
            int w = exclusiveCount(c);
            if (c != 0) {
                // (Note: if c != 0 and w == 0 then shared count != 0)
                if (w == 0 || current != getExclusiveOwnerThread())
                    return false;
                if (w + exclusiveCount(acquires) > MAX_COUNT)
                    throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
                // Reentrant acquire
                setState(c + acquires);
                return true;
            }
            if (writerShouldBlock() ||
                !compareAndSetState(c, c + acquires))
                return false;
            setExclusiveOwnerThread(current);
            return true;
        }

首先调用获取了一下state值，然后调用exclusiveCount方法获取当前写锁的数量。

然后做了一个判断，当c！=0时：如果w==0（即读锁的数量！=0），直接返回false。因为我们前面已经说过，读锁和写锁不能同时存在。当c！=0且W！=0的时候，有写锁存在，如果写锁不是由当前线程持有（注意，写锁是独占锁，只能由一个线程持有），直接返回false。如果是当前线程持有写锁，说明当前线程正在试图“重入”写锁。调用setState更新status值。注意，由于写锁是独占锁，因此执行到setState这一步时不可能出现竞争，因此不用调用CAS操作，直接setState即可。

注意：如果一个线程在持有读锁的情况下去申请写锁（试图锁升级），会导致思索。tryAcquire在这种情况下返回false，AQS的acquire方法会将当前线程放入等待队列去等待写锁，在获取写锁之前不会释放锁持有的读锁，而读锁和写锁不能同时存在，发生死锁，他将永远不能获取这个写锁，其他线程也不能获取写锁，但读锁可被正常获取，只是永远不能获取写锁了。

如果c==0时，说明不存在任何锁。调用writerShouldBlock方法判断一下此时线程是否应该进入等待队列。注意：公平模式&非公平模式下的writerShouldBlock是不同的，非公平模式下，writerShouldBlock方法直接返回false，这也符合非公平的语义：

        final boolean writerShouldBlock() {
            return false; // writers can always barge
        }

而公平模式下，则调用方法，判断下等待队列中，当前线程之前是否有其他线程正在等待：

        final boolean writerShouldBlock() {
            return hasQueuedPredecessors();
        }

注意，如果有，那么我们当时获取status的值的时候，这些线程还没来得及更改status值（因为我们当时获取的status为0），原因可能是应为刚到，或者刚被唤醒，在自旋中，还没有成功获取锁。 

    public final boolean hasQueuedPredecessors() {
        // The correctness of this depends on head being initialized
        // before tail and on head.next being accurate if the current
        // thread is first in queue.
        Node t = tail; // Read fields in reverse initialization order
        Node h = head;
        Node s;
        return h != t &&
            ((s = h.next) == null || s.thread != Thread.currentThread());
    }

返回true必须满足两个条件：①队列非空②第一个等待线程（head.next）为空 或 不为空但不是当前线程。head.next为空的情形是：在我们获取head之后，head就被队列中下一个等待线程线程踢出队列了，next被置为空，那么踢他出去的这个线程一定不是当前线程，说明有其他线程等待在队列中。

我们回到tryAcquire方法中，当发现writerShouldBlock为true，或者writerShouldBlock为false但在CAS操作中失败时（由于这里的获取写锁不是重入，因此可能有多个线程同时竞争写锁），返回false。如果CAS成功，则调用setExclusiveOwnerThread将当前持有写锁的线程设置为当前线程。

2、release 释放写锁

        public void unlock() {
            sync.release(1);
        }

与ReentrantLock一样，unlock方法调用AQS提供的release方法：

    public final boolean release(int arg) {
        if (tryRelease(arg)) {
            Node h = head;
            if (h != null && h.waitStatus != 0)
                unparkSuccessor(h);
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }

release方法已经在笔者之前的另一篇博文AQS源码学习笔记中详细介绍，不再赘述。我么这里重点关注自定义同步器Sync重写的tryRelease方法：

        protected final boolean tryRelease(int releases) {
            if (!isHeldExclusively())
                throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
            int nextc = getState() - releases;
            boolean free = exclusiveCount(nextc) == 0;
            if (free)
                setExclusiveOwnerThread(null);
            setState(nextc);
            return free;
        }

首先，我们需要清楚一点：tryRelease方法的返回值不是表示是否成功获取，而是表示当前释放操作完成后，剩余写锁数量是否等于0（即完成此释放后，写锁是否可用）。这与同样是可重入的ReentrantLock的tryRelease方法一样，ReentrantLock的tryRelease方法返回值的意义也是剩余写锁数量是否等于0（即完成此释放后，写锁是否可用）。

3、tryLock 获取写锁

        public boolean tryLock( ) {
            return sync.tryWriteLock();
        }

WriteLock的tryLock方法调用自定义同步器Sync的tryWriteLock方法实现：

        final boolean tryWriteLock() {
            Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
            int c = getState();
            if (c != 0) {
                int w = exclusiveCount(c);
                if (w == 0 || current != getExclusiveOwnerThread())
                    return false;
                if (w == MAX_COUNT)
                    throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
            }
            if (!compareAndSetState(c, c + 1))
                return false;
            setExclusiveOwnerThread(current);
            return true;
        }

tryWriteLock方法看上去跟tryAcquire方法真的很像。唯一的区别在于，tryWriteLock忽略的writerShouldBlock方法，即，默认调用tryLock方法的时机，就是需要我们去“抢”写锁的时机。

二、读锁

1、lock 获取读锁

        public void lock() {
            sync.acquireShared(1);
        }

ReadLock的lock方法调用AQS提供的acquireShared方法来实现：

    public final void acquireShared(int arg) {
        if (tryAcquireShared(arg) < 0)
            doAcquireShared(arg);
    }

acquireShared方法已经在笔者之前的另一篇博文AQS源码学习笔记中详细介绍，不再赘述。我们重点关注自定义同步器Sync重写的tryAcquireShared方法：

        protected final int tryAcquireShared(int unused) {
            /*
             * Walkthrough:
             * 1. If write lock held by another thread, fail.
             * 2. Otherwise, this thread is eligible for
             *    lock wrt state, so ask if it should block
             *    because of queue policy. If not, try
             *    to grant by CASing state and updating count.
             *    Note that step does not check for reentrant
             *    acquires, which is postponed to full version
             *    to avoid having to check hold count in
             *    the more typical non-reentrant case.
             * 3. If step 2 fails either because thread
             *    apparently not eligible or CAS fails or count
             *    saturated, chain to version with full retry loop.
             */
            Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
            int c = getState();
            if (exclusiveCount(c) != 0 &&
                getExclusiveOwnerThread() != current)
                return -1;
            int r = sharedCount(c);
            if (!readerShouldBlock() &&
                r < MAX_COUNT &&
                compareAndSetState(c, c + SHARED_UNIT)) {
                if (r == 0) {
                    firstReader = current;
                    firstReaderHoldCount = 1;
                } else if (firstReader == current) {
                    firstReaderHoldCount++;
                } else {
                    HoldCounter rh = cachedHoldCounter;
                    if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
                        cachedHoldCounter = rh = readHolds.get();
                    else if (rh.count == 0)
                        readHolds.set(rh);
                    rh.count++;
                }
                return 1;
            }
            return fullTryAcquireShared(current);
        }

方法首先检测了一下当前是否有其他线程持有写锁，如果是的话，直接返回-1，表示获取失败。后续AQS的acquireShared方法会将当前线程放入等待队列中。

然后方法做了这样一个判断，如果当前线程可以直接参与竞争读锁的话，就调用CAS操作将status值加一个SHARED_UNIT，注意，这里不是加1是应为status的高16位代表读锁的数量。

OK，我们必须在这里暂停一下，我们需要详细解释一下几个成员变量：

        static final class HoldCounter {
            int count = 0;
            // Use id, not reference, to avoid garbage retention
            final long tid = getThreadId(Thread.currentThread());
        }

        static final class ThreadLocalHoldCounter
            extends ThreadLocal<HoldCounter> {
            public HoldCounter initialValue() {
                return new HoldCounter();
            }
        }

        private transient ThreadLocalHoldCounter readHolds;
        private transient HoldCounter cachedHoldCounter;

        private transient Thread firstReader = null;
        private transient int firstReaderHoldCount;

HoldCounter是一个final的内部类，有两个成员：tid&count，分别代表一个线程ID和线程对应的一个计数值。

ThreadLocalHoldCounter是一个final的内部类，它继承自ThreadLocal<HoldCounter>，它重写了initialValue方法，ThreadLocalHoldCounter对象对某一个线程第一次调用get方法是，会调用initialValue方法初始化这个线程响应的本地变量，并加入到map中。

readHolds存在的作用是：记录所有持有读锁的线程所持有读锁的数量。对于写锁来说，它是独占锁，我们可以通过status的低16位+独占写锁的线程来记录关于写锁的所有信息，即它被谁持有&被重入的数量。而读锁是一个共享锁，任何线程都可能持有它，因此，我们必须对每个线程都记录一下它所持有的共享锁（读锁）的数量。本地变量ThreadLocal来实现这个记录是非常合适的。

cachedHoldCounter是一个缓存。很多情况下，一个线程获取读锁之后要更新一下它对应的记录值（线程对应的HoldCounter对象），然后有很大可能在很短的时间内就释放掉读锁，这时候需要再次更新HoldCounter，甚至需要从readHolds中删除（如果重入的读锁都被释放掉的话），需要调用readHolds的get方法，这是有一定开销的。因此，设置cachedHoldCounter作为一个缓存，在某个线程需要这个记录值的时候，先检查cachedHoldCounter对应的线程是否是这个线程自己，如果不是的话，再熊readHolds中get出来，这提高了效率。

firsReader&firstReaderHoldCount，这两个值记录了第一个获取读锁的线程和它持有的读锁的数量（可重入的嘛），这两个值在读锁全部释放之后要清空，以便记录下一次首先获取读锁的线程和其锁数目。这两个值存在的意义是：很多时候，读锁只被一个线程获取，这时候我们规定，第一个获取读锁的线程的计数不放入readHolds中，而是单独用这两个计数值来记录，这就避免了当只有一个线程操作读锁的时候，频繁地在readHolds上读取，提高了效率。

注意区别：cachedHoldCounter提高的是一个线程获取-释放之间没有其他线程来获取或释放锁时的效率；firsReader&firstReaderHoldCount提高的是只有一个线程操作锁时的效率。

这时候我们再回到tryAcquireShared方法，当CAS操作成功后，需要去更新刚刚说过的计数值。具体细节代码已经很清楚，不再赘述。

如果CAS失败或readerShouldBlock方法返回true，我们调用fullTryAcquireShared方法继续试图获取读锁。fullTryAcquireShared方法是tryAcquireShared方法的完整版，或者叫升级版，它处理了CAS失败的情况和readerShouldBlock返回true的情况。

在分析fullTryAcquireShared方法之前，我们先来看一下readerShouldBlock方法：

在公平模式下，根据等待队列中在当前线程之前有没有等待线程来判断：

        final boolean readerShouldBlock() {
            return hasQueuedPredecessors();
        }

而在非公平模式下：

        final boolean readerShouldBlock() {
            return apparentlyFirstQueuedIsExclusive();
        }

调用了apparentlyFirstQueuedIsExclusive方法：

    final boolean apparentlyFirstQueuedIsExclusive() {
        Node h, s;
        return (h = head) != null &&
            (s = h.next)  != null &&
            !s.isShared()         &&
            s.thread != null;
    }

这个方法返回是否队列的head.next正在等待独占锁（写锁）。当然这个方法执行的过程中队列的形态可能发生变化。这个方法的意思是：读锁不应该让写锁始终等待。

好了，我们现在来看fullTryAcquireShared方法：

        /**
         * Full version of acquire for reads, that handles CAS misses
         * and reentrant reads not dealt with in tryAcquireShared.
         */
        final int fullTryAcquireShared(Thread current) {
            /*
             * This code is in part redundant with that in
             * tryAcquireShared but is simpler overall by not
             * complicating tryAcquireShared with interactions between
             * retries and lazily reading hold counts.
             */
            HoldCounter rh = null;
            for (;;) {
                int c = getState();
                if (exclusiveCount(c) != 0) {
                    if (getExclusiveOwnerThread() != current)
                        return -1;
                    // else we hold the exclusive lock; blocking here
                    // would cause deadlock.
                } else if (readerShouldBlock()) {
                    // Make sure we're not acquiring read lock reentrantly
                    if (firstReader == current) {
                        // assert firstReaderHoldCount > 0;
                    } else {
                        if (rh == null) {
                            rh = cachedHoldCounter;
                            if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current)) {
                                rh = readHolds.get();
                                if (rh.count == 0)
                                    readHolds.remove();
                            }
                        }
                        if (rh.count == 0)
                            return -1;
                    }
                }
                if (sharedCount(c) == MAX_COUNT)
                    throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
                if (compareAndSetState(c, c + SHARED_UNIT)) {
                    if (sharedCount(c) == 0) {
                        firstReader = current;
                        firstReaderHoldCount = 1;
                    } else if (firstReader == current) {
                        firstReaderHoldCount++;
                    } else {
                        if (rh == null)
                            rh = cachedHoldCounter;
                        if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
                            rh = readHolds.get();
                        else if (rh.count == 0)
                            readHolds.set(rh);
                        rh.count++;
                        cachedHoldCounter = rh; // cache for release
                    }
                    return 1;
                }
            }
        }

我们可以看到：fullTryAcquireShared方法是tryAcquireShared方法的完整版，或者叫升级版，它处理了CAS失败的情况和readerShouldBlock返回true的情况。

跟tryAcquireShared方法一样，首先检查是否有其他线程正在持有写锁，如果是，直接返回false。如果没有线程正在持有写锁，则调用readerShouldBlock检测当前线程是否应该进入等待队列。就算readerShouldBlock方法返回true，原因可能因为当前是公平模式或者队列的第一个等待线程（head.next）正在等待写锁，我们也不能直接返回false，因为返回false意味着当前线程将要进入等待队列（见AQS的acquireShared方法），原因是：①如果当前线程正在持有读锁，且这次读锁的重入被放入等待队列，万一之前队列中有线程正在等待写锁，将会导致死锁；②另一种情况是当前线程正在持有写锁，且这次读锁的“降级申请”被放入等待队列，如果队列中之前有线程正在等待锁，不论等待的是写锁还是读锁，都将导致死锁。

因此，我们需要做一个判断，如果这次申请读锁是对读锁的一次重入（因为我们已经检测过没有写锁，因此只考虑上述第①种情况），我们将不能返回false（返回false意味着进队列），而是调用CAS操作去获取读锁，如果CAS失败，则一直自旋，直到成功获取，或者可以返回false去队列的时机的到来。

我们可以这样提fullTryAcquireShared方法说句话：不是我不想进队列休息，实在是因为进队列有可能死锁，所以我才一直自旋！

注意：判断重入的时候firstReader==当前线程即说明是一次重入，因为firstReader线程释放最后一个读锁的时候会将firstReader置为null，这里还不是null，说明依然持有读锁。

另外还记得我们提过apparentlyFirstQueuedIsExclusive方法是不可靠的吗，它在检测的过程中队列结构可能被更改，head可能被踢出，方法可能因为head.next为null而返回false。而且它也只是检测第一个等待线程（head.next），如果有等待写锁的线程在后面，它也不能检测出来。不过没关系，这些都导致它返回false，返回false意味着fullTryAcquireShared可以去抢“锁”并不会影响正确性。

2、unlock 释放读锁

        public void unlock() {
            sync.releaseShared(1);
        }

readLock的unlock方法调用AQS提供的releaseShared方法实现：

    public final boolean releaseShared(int arg) {
        if (tryReleaseShared(arg)) {
            doReleaseShared();
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }

releaseShared方法已在笔者的另一篇博文AQS源码学习笔记中详细介绍，不再赘述。这里我们关注自定义同步器Sync重写的tryReleaseShared方法：

        protected final boolean tryReleaseShared(int unused) {
            Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
            if (firstReader == current) {
                // assert firstReaderHoldCount > 0;
                if (firstReaderHoldCount == 1)
                    firstReader = null;
                else
                    firstReaderHoldCount--;
            } else {
                HoldCounter rh = cachedHoldCounter;
                if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
                    rh = readHolds.get();
                int count = rh.count;
                if (count <= 1) {
                    readHolds.remove();
                    if (count <= 0)
                        throw unmatchedUnlockException();
                }
                --rh.count;
            }
            for (;;) {
                int c = getState();
                int nextc = c - SHARED_UNIT;
                if (compareAndSetState(c, nextc))
                    // Releasing the read lock has no effect on readers,
                    // but it may allow waiting writers to proceed if
                    // both read and write locks are now free.
                    return nextc == 0;
            }
        }

分为三部分：①如果是firstReader，对firstReader修改；②如果不是firstReader，修改readHolds；③CAS自旋更新status值。

注意：tryReleaseShared方法的返回值如果为true，表示status为0，即已经不存在任何锁，both读锁&写锁。

3、tryLock 获取读锁

        public boolean tryLock() {
            return sync.tryReadLock();
        }

ReadLock的tryLock调用自定义同步器Sync的tryReadLock方法实现：

        final boolean tryReadLock() {
            Thread current = Thread.currentThread();
            for (;;) {
                int c = getState();
                if (exclusiveCount(c) != 0 &&
                    getExclusiveOwnerThread() != current)
                    return false;
                int r = sharedCount(c);
                if (r == MAX_COUNT)
                    throw new Error("Maximum lock count exceeded");
                if (compareAndSetState(c, c + SHARED_UNIT)) {
                    if (r == 0) {
                        firstReader = current;
                        firstReaderHoldCount = 1;
                    } else if (firstReader == current) {
                        firstReaderHoldCount++;
                    } else {
                        HoldCounter rh = cachedHoldCounter;
                        if (rh == null || rh.tid != getThreadId(current))
                            cachedHoldCounter = rh = readHolds.get();
                        else if (rh.count == 0)
                            readHolds.set(rh);
                        rh.count++;
                    }
                    return true;
                }
            }
        }

与写锁的tryWriteLock方法类似，tryReadLock同样忽略了readerShouldBlock方法，因为调用这个方法就意味着：现在是适合抢占的时机。

tryReadLock方法与tryAcquireShared方法十分类似，不同在于：当CAS失败时，tryAcquireShared方法调用fullAcquireShared处理CAS失败，而tryReadLock方法遇到CAS失败时，直接返回false，毕竟只是try嘛。

 

总结：

ReentrantReadWriteLock相比于其他锁，还是比较复杂的，因为他结合了共享锁和独占锁，并混合使用了他们。虽然ReentrantReadWriteLock通过精巧的设计尽量避免死锁的发生，但如果我们使用不当仍然可能发生死锁，比如我们在持有读锁的情况下去申请写，企图做锁升级。