Unbalanced enable for IRQ 171
Unbalanced enable for IRQ 171
Unbalanced enable for IRQ 171
--------------------------------------------------------
Hi Greg,
I am sorry, it is my mistake. My colleague (harrY) told me about disable_irq, enable_irq which I missed disable_irq() before tasklet_sched() That obviously will cause Unbalanced enable, when I enable_irq inside the tasklet. So this is false alarm.
Thanks!
Allen
The enable_irq unbalanced messages are harmless. It just means that when the driver called disable_irq there were no devices already using the irq, and as such it was already disabled, so the call to disable_irq was forgotten by the kernel, so when we call enable_irq the core kernel code thinks it's unbalanced when it isn't.
--------------------------------------------------------
Hi Greg,
I am sorry, it is my mistake. My colleague (harrY) told me about disable_irq, enable_irq which I missed disable_irq() before tasklet_sched() That obviously will cause Unbalanced enable, when I enable_irq inside the tasklet. So this is false alarm.
Thanks!
Allen
The enable_irq unbalanced messages are harmless. It just means that when the driver called disable_irq there were no devices already using the irq, and as such it was already disabled, so the call to disable_irq was forgotten by the kernel, so when we call enable_irq the core kernel code thinks it's unbalanced when it isn't.