最近准备换VPS,看到有VPS支持FreeBSD,就打算试试。想了解一下它和linux性能上的差异,就在网上找了些文章看了看。很多文章都提到FreeBSD更适合做前端的文件服务器,它的数据库性能和SMP性能不如linux。不过这些文章要么比较老,要么就是纯粹的口水仗,缺乏翔实的数据支撑。于是还是决定自己多装几台虚拟机测试一下好了。
测试环境:
宿主:
Core i3 530 @ 2.93GHz 双核4线程
16G RAM
Windows 7 64bit
虚拟机软件:
Virtualbox 4.1.2
虚拟机配置:
FreeBSD 7.2 i386 / FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 / Debian 5.0 i386 / CentOS 5.6 i386
双核全速
256M RAM
8GB硬盘
启用硬件虚拟化和IO APIC
各系统用最小安装,然后安装了编译工具链+apache(为了方便使用ab)+php+mysql。之后关掉apache,安装nginx。
FreeBSD使用ports编译安装nginx,Debian分别使用了源自带的和编译的最新稳定版,CentOS使用编译的最新稳定版。FreeBSD的nginx应该默认使用了kqueue,linux默认使用了epoll。
nginx设置为1个worker,开启gzip。
测试使用ApacheBench,测试文件为一个57244 bytes的jquery.js。
除CentOS外,ApacheBench都是2.3版,CentOS是2.0版。
ab -c 10 -n 100000 http://localhost/jquery.js
不多废话了,以下是测试结果:
FreeBSD 7.2 i386 + nginx 0.6.36
Concurrency Level: 10
Time taken for tests: 26.156 seconds
Complete requests: 100000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 5747200000 bytes
HTML transferred: 5724400000 bytes
Requests per second: 3823.15 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 2.616 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.262 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 214574.53 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 0.2 0 4
Processing: 0 2 0.8 2 18
Waiting: 0 1 0.6 1 16
Total: 0 3 0.7 2 18
FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 + nginx 0.8.54
Concurrency Level: 10
Time taken for tests: 24.675 seconds
Complete requests: 100000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 5747257344 bytes
HTML transferred: 5724457116 bytes
Requests per second: 4052.62 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 2.468 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.247 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 227455.77 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 0.2 0 8
Processing: 1 2 0.6 2 19
Waiting: 0 1 0.5 1 9
Total: 1 2 0.6 2 20
Debian 5.0 i386 + nginx 0.6.32
Concurrency Level: 10
Time taken for tests: 9.808 seconds
Complete requests: 100000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 5747257472 bytes
HTML transferred: 5724457244 bytes
Requests per second: 10195.98 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 0.981 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.098 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 572254.98 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 0.1 0 10
Processing: 0 1 1.0 1 94
Waiting: 0 0 0.9 0 94
Total: 0 1 1.0 1 95
Debian 5.0 i386 + nginx 1.0.6
Concurrency Level: 10
Time taken for tests: 9.321 seconds
Complete requests: 100000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 5747157471 bytes
HTML transferred: 5724457244 bytes
Requests per second: 10728.92 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 0.932 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.093 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 602156.28 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 0.1 0 7
Processing: 0 1 0.4 1 32
Waiting: 0 0 0.4 0 31
Total: 0 1 0.5 1 32
CentOS 5.6 i386 + nginx 1.0.6
Concurrency Level: 10
Time taken for tests: 9.996502 seconds
Complete requests: 100000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 1452132704 bytes
HTML transferred: 1429432704 bytes
Requests per second: 10003.50 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 1.000 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.100 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 141859.42 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 3
Processing: 0 0 0.7 0 9
Waiting: 0 0 0.2 0 6
Total: 0 0 0.7 0 9
整理:
和之前看到的很多文章的观点正相反,在nginx静态文件性能的测试中,FreeBSD表现出了巨大的劣势。
由于这一结果非常奇怪,我又将虚拟机改为单核,并测试了lighttpd,结果依然是linux领先了一倍左右。究竟是什么原因造成如此巨大的差异呢?
【推荐】国内首个AI IDE,深度理解中文开发场景,立即下载体验Trae
【推荐】编程新体验,更懂你的AI,立即体验豆包MarsCode编程助手
【推荐】抖音旗下AI助手豆包,你的智能百科全书,全免费不限次数
【推荐】轻量又高性能的 SSH 工具 IShell:AI 加持,快人一步
· Linux系列:如何用 C#调用 C方法造成内存泄露
· AI与.NET技术实操系列(二):开始使用ML.NET
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 探究高空视频全景AR技术的实现原理
· 理解Rust引用及其生命周期标识(上)
· 阿里最新开源QwQ-32B,效果媲美deepseek-r1满血版,部署成本又又又降低了!
· 单线程的Redis速度为什么快?
· 展开说说关于C#中ORM框架的用法!
· SQL Server 2025 AI相关能力初探
· AI编程工具终极对决:字节Trae VS Cursor,谁才是开发者新宠?