reading "semantic Layers for Illustrative Volume Rendering" Second time
today, I read the "semantic Layers for Illustrative Volume Rendering" for the second time. and get some different feeling with last time.
I think why this paper succeeds with my rejected rule-based volume renderng paper is: it combines the rule with the style. However I just combine the rule with the opacity in transfer function.
At the same time, the author extended his work with the sytles, such as Parameterization, Layered styles. But I just emphasis transfer function, didn't import many domain knowledge. If I add more knowledge in flow, maybe the situation is different.
In a short, just a idea for a paper is not enough. I should extend it and make it is some completed. After reading many papers, I think this is very important!
I think why this paper succeeds with my rejected rule-based volume renderng paper is: it combines the rule with the style. However I just combine the rule with the opacity in transfer function.
At the same time, the author extended his work with the sytles, such as Parameterization, Layered styles. But I just emphasis transfer function, didn't import many domain knowledge. If I add more knowledge in flow, maybe the situation is different.
In a short, just a idea for a paper is not enough. I should extend it and make it is some completed. After reading many papers, I think this is very important!
posted on 2007-09-24 11:14 cloudseawang 阅读(237) 评论(0) 编辑 收藏 举报
