the field is sometimes used inside synchronized block and sometimes used without synchronization
Is it safe to use field inside and outside synchronized block?
问题:
Background
Our app sends emails which are queued in a database table. We've had some instances of duplicate emails being sent, so I'm implementing a lock to prevent multiple threads from sending emails simultaneously.
ReSharper is warning me that:
the field is sometimes used inside synchronized block and sometimes used without synchronization
Question
Why is ReSharper telling me this, and why might I be worried about it?
Code
Here's my (abridged) code:
private readonly IMailQueueRepository _mailQueueRepository = new MailQueueRepository();
private static object _messageQueueLock = new object();
public void SendAllQueuedMessages(IPrincipal caller)
{
lock (_messageQueueLock) // Prevent concurrent callers
{
var message = _mailQueueRepository.GetUnsentMessage();
while (message != null)
{
SendQueuedMessage(message);
message = _mailQueueRepository.GetUnsentMessage();
}
}
}
public void SendQueuedMessage(IMessage message)
{
// I get the ReSharper warning here on _mailQueueRepository
var messageAttachments = _mailQueueRepository.GetMessageAttachments(message.Id);
// etc.
}
解答:
Problem scenario :
We've had some instances of duplicate emails being sent, so I'm implementing a lock to prevent multiple threads from sending emails simultaneously.
So you are using Lock()
to prevent this happening, that means you need to synchronize threads accessing a common resource which in this case _mailQueueRepository
But again in the same code you use _mailQueueRepository
without a Lock
// I get the ReSharper warning here on _mailQueueRepository
var messageAttachments = _mailQueueRepository.GetMessageAttachments(message.Id); // <== Accessed without a lock
So it's a warning to tell that your valuable resource is accessed in two different forms : one as synchronized
(thread safe) and other non-synchronized
(non thread safe).
And it's a warning that let you know(or let you identify) issues that could arise from this contradictory usage of the resource _mailQueueRepository
. Choice is yours to either make all usages of _mailQueueRepository
synchronized
(use with a lock
and warning will be gone) or manage not to run for race conditions.
Additionally you might consider to re-structure the codes in such a way that your SendQueuedMessage()
is called with parameters which are extracted from _mailQueueRepository
avoiding mix usage.
Actually, it's the method which reads the queue and sends emails - not the repository itself - that I'm trying to prevent concurrent access to. I want threads to be able to write to the repository while one thread is reading emails and sending them. But I guess ReSharper can't tell that, so it warns me. I know that I'm actually fine with unsynchronized access to that resource, so I guess I'm safe to ignore the warning? – OutstandingBill
@OutstandingBill - From resharper : "Warnings In addition to compiler errors and warnings, ReSharper displays its own warnings that don't prevent your code from compiling but may nevertheless represent serious coding inefficiencies". Resharper is intelligence enough to say contradictory usage but you are the one know what actual usage is. If you are confirmed to use the resource well managed you could ignore the warning :) – KcDoD
@OutstandingBill Additionally you might be interested in re-tructuring the method to take parameters extracted from the field , rather than using it in mix context – KcDoD
作者:Chuck Lu GitHub |
【推荐】国内首个AI IDE,深度理解中文开发场景,立即下载体验Trae
【推荐】编程新体验,更懂你的AI,立即体验豆包MarsCode编程助手
【推荐】抖音旗下AI助手豆包,你的智能百科全书,全免费不限次数
【推荐】轻量又高性能的 SSH 工具 IShell:AI 加持,快人一步
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 探究高空视频全景AR技术的实现原理
· 理解Rust引用及其生命周期标识(上)
· 浏览器原生「磁吸」效果!Anchor Positioning 锚点定位神器解析
· 没有源码,如何修改代码逻辑?
· 全程不用写代码,我用AI程序员写了一个飞机大战
· DeepSeek 开源周回顾「GitHub 热点速览」
· MongoDB 8.0这个新功能碉堡了,比商业数据库还牛
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 白话解读 Dapr 1.15:你的「微服务管家」又秀新绝活了