LEFT JOIN vs. LEFT OUTER JOIN in SQL Server
LEFT JOIN vs. LEFT OUTER JOIN in SQL Server
As per the documentation: FROM (Transact-SQL):
<join_type> ::=
[ { INNER | { { LEFT | RIGHT | FULL } [ OUTER ] } } [ <join_hint> ] ]
JOIN
The keyword OUTER
is marked as optional (enclosed in square brackets). In this specific case, whether you specify OUTER
or not makes no difference. Note that while the other elements of the join clause is also marked as optional, leaving them out will make a difference.
For instance, the entire type-part of the JOIN
clause is optional, in which case the default is INNER
if you just specify JOIN
. In other words, this is legal:
SELECT *
FROM A JOIN B ON A.X = B.Y
Here's a list of equivalent syntaxes:
A LEFT JOIN B A LEFT OUTER JOIN B
A RIGHT JOIN B A RIGHT OUTER JOIN B
A FULL JOIN B A FULL OUTER JOIN B
A INNER JOIN B A JOIN B
Also take a look at the answer I left on this other SO question: SQL left join vs multiple tables on FROM line?.
需要注意下面的图的数据,a和b的交集,可能会超出想象。
a left join b,a里面一条数据可能对应b里面的两条数据,甚至3条数据
作者:Chuck Lu GitHub |
【推荐】国内首个AI IDE,深度理解中文开发场景,立即下载体验Trae
【推荐】编程新体验,更懂你的AI,立即体验豆包MarsCode编程助手
【推荐】抖音旗下AI助手豆包,你的智能百科全书,全免费不限次数
【推荐】轻量又高性能的 SSH 工具 IShell:AI 加持,快人一步
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 探究高空视频全景AR技术的实现原理
· 理解Rust引用及其生命周期标识(上)
· 浏览器原生「磁吸」效果!Anchor Positioning 锚点定位神器解析
· 没有源码,如何修改代码逻辑?
· 全程不用写代码,我用AI程序员写了一个飞机大战
· DeepSeek 开源周回顾「GitHub 热点速览」
· MongoDB 8.0这个新功能碉堡了,比商业数据库还牛
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 白话解读 Dapr 1.15:你的「微服务管家」又秀新绝活了
2019-03-02 git源码阅读
2018-03-02 我最在行 汉字
2018-03-02 self join in sql server
2018-03-02 窗口函数 SELECT - OVER Clause (Transact-SQL)
2018-03-02 SQL Source Control for teams
2018-03-02 在存储过程中触发错误
2018-03-02 case when in sql server's stored procedure