What does “Use of unassigned local variable” mean?

What does “Use of unassigned local variable” mean?

The compiler isn't smart enough to know that at least one of your if blocks will be executed. Therefore, it doesn't see that variables like annualRate will be assigned no matter what. Here's how you can make the compiler understand:

if (creditPlan == "0")
{
    // ...
}
else if (creditPlan == "1")
{
    // ...
}
else if (creditPlan == "2")
{
    // ...
}
else
{
    // ...
}

The compiler knows that with an if/else block, one of the blocks is guaranteed to be executed, and therefore if you're assigning the variable in all of the blocks, it won't give the compiler error.

By the way, you can also use a switch statement instead of ifs to maybe make your code cleaner.

 

Are C# uninitialized variables dangerous?

I am under the impression that there are not truly "unassigned" values allowed by the runtime. In particular that a reference type that is not initialized will always have a null value, never the value left over from a previous invocation of the method or random value. Is this correct?

I note that no one has actually answered your question yet.

The answer to the question you actually asked is "sorta".

As others have noted, some variables (array elements, fields, and so on) are classified as being automatically "initially assigned" to their default value. (Which is null for reference types, zero for numeric types, false for bools, and the natural recursion for user-defined structs).

Some variables are not classified as initially assigned; local variables in particular are not initially assigned. They must be classified by the compiler as "definitely assigned" at all points where their values are used.

Your question then is actually "is a local variable that is classified as not definitely assigned actually initially assigned the same way that a field would be?" And the answer to that question is yes, in practice, the runtime initially assigns all locals.

This has several nice properties. First, you can observe them in the debugger to be in their default state before their first assignment. Second, there is no chance that the garbage collector will be tricked into dereferencing a bad pointer just because there was garbage left on the stack that is now being treated as a managed reference. And so on.

The runtime is permitted to leave the initial state of locals as whatever garbage happened to be there if it can do so safely. But as an implementation detail, it does not ever choose to do so. It zeros out the memory for a local variable aggressively.

The reason then for the rule that locals must be definitely assigned before they are used is not to prevent you from observing the garbage uninitialized state of the local. That is already unobservable because the CLR aggressively clears locals to their default values, the same as it does for fields and array elements. The reason this is illegal in C# is because using an unassigned local has high likelihood of being a bug. We simply make it illegal, and then the compiler prevents you from ever having such a bug.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

作者:Chuck Lu    GitHub    
posted @   ChuckLu  阅读(315)  评论(0编辑  收藏  举报
编辑推荐:
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 探究高空视频全景AR技术的实现原理
· 理解Rust引用及其生命周期标识(上)
· 浏览器原生「磁吸」效果!Anchor Positioning 锚点定位神器解析
· 没有源码,如何修改代码逻辑?
阅读排行:
· 全程不用写代码,我用AI程序员写了一个飞机大战
· DeepSeek 开源周回顾「GitHub 热点速览」
· MongoDB 8.0这个新功能碉堡了,比商业数据库还牛
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 白话解读 Dapr 1.15:你的「微服务管家」又秀新绝活了
历史上的今天:
2019-06-18 538. Convert BST to Greater Tree
点击右上角即可分享
微信分享提示