Unexpected ConvertTo-Json results? Answer: it has a default -Depth of 2

Unexpected ConvertTo-Json results? Answer: it has a default -Depth of 2

问题

Why do I get unexpected ConvertTo-Json results?
And why does a round-trip ($Json | ConvertFrom-Json | ConvertTo-Json) fail?

Meta issue

Stackoverflow has a good mechanism to prevent duplicate questions but as far as I can see there is no mechanism to prevent questions that have a duplicate cause. Take this question as a an example: almost every week a new question comes in with the same cause, yet it is often difficult to define it as a duplicate because the question itself is just a slightly different. Nevertheless, I wouldn't be surprised if this question/answer itself ends up as a duplicate (or off-topic) but unfortunately stackoverflow has no possibility to write an article to prevent other programmers from continuing writing questions caused by this “known” pitfall.

Duplicates

A few examples of similar questions with the same common cause:

Different

So, were does this “self-answered” question differ from the above duplicates?
It has the common cause in the title and with that it might better prevent repeating questions due to the same cause.

 
解答

Answer

ConvertTo-Json has a -Depth parameter:

Specifies how many levels of contained objects are included in the JSON representation.
The default value is 2.

Example

To do a full round-trip with a JSON file you need to increase the -Depth for the ConvertTo-Json cmdlet:

$Json | ConvertFrom-Json | ConvertTo-Json -Depth 9

TL;DR

Probably because ConvertTo-Json terminates branches that are deeper than the default -Depth (2) with a (.Net) full type name, programmers assume a bug or a cmdlet limitation and do not read the help or about.
Personally, I think a string with a simple ellipsis (three dots: …) at the end of the cut off branch, would have a clearer meaning (see also: Github issue: 8381)

Why?

This issue often ends up in another discussion as well: Why is the depth limited at all?

Some objects have circular references, meaning that a child object could refer to a parent (or one of its grandparents) causing a infinitive loop if it would be serialized to JSON.

Take for example the following hash table with a parent property that refers to the object itself:

$Test = @{Guid = New-Guid}
$Test.Parent = $Test

If you execute: $Test | ConvertTo-Json it will conveniently stop at a depth level of 2 by default:

{
    "Guid":  "a274d017-5188-4d91-b960-023c06159dcc",
    "Parent":  {
                   "Guid":  "a274d017-5188-4d91-b960-023c06159dcc",
                   "Parent":  {
                                  "Guid":  "a274d017-5188-4d91-b960-023c06159dcc",
                                  "Parent":  "System.Collections.Hashtable"
                              }
               }
}

This is why it is not a good idea to automatically set the -Depth to a large amount.

作者:Chuck Lu    GitHub    
posted @   ChuckLu  阅读(253)  评论(0编辑  收藏  举报
编辑推荐:
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 探究高空视频全景AR技术的实现原理
· 理解Rust引用及其生命周期标识(上)
· 浏览器原生「磁吸」效果!Anchor Positioning 锚点定位神器解析
· 没有源码,如何修改代码逻辑?
阅读排行:
· 全程不用写代码,我用AI程序员写了一个飞机大战
· DeepSeek 开源周回顾「GitHub 热点速览」
· MongoDB 8.0这个新功能碉堡了,比商业数据库还牛
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 白话解读 Dapr 1.15:你的「微服务管家」又秀新绝活了
历史上的今天:
2015-07-16 WCF Host中的BaseAddress 和 Endpoint中的Address的区别
2015-07-16 使用vs自带的wcf配置工具
2015-07-16 Automatic Code Generation-->Implement Interface
2015-07-16 Learning WCF Chapter1 Exposing Multiple Service Endpoints
2015-07-16 无法自动调试 未能调试远程过程。这通常说明未在服务器上启用调试 WCF 托管在IIS上
2015-07-16 ServiceModel Metadata Utility Tool (Svcutil.exe)
点击右上角即可分享
微信分享提示