随笔 - 1  文章 - 1218  评论 - 155  阅读 - 516万

在此页上的 ActiveX 控件和本页上的其它部份的交互可能不安全

在EOS6的项目中,如果采用VC++开发的ActiveX,那么第一次运行的时候,IE中就会提示,“在此页上的ActiveX控件和本 页上的其他部分的交互可能不安全,你想允许这种交互吗?”在网上找了很多资料,原理介绍的多,但是真正如何做,介绍的比较少,因此这里把实际的步骤一步一 步的记录下来了,供大家参考。
1.1 去除ActiveX访问时的安全提示
当ActiveX第一次被访问时,会出现如下提示框:

这是IE浏览器的安全机制造成的,我们可以采用下面的步骤来去除这个提示信息:
1.1.1 在CDemoCtl的头文件.h中增加对objsave的引用
#include <objsafe.h>
1.1.2 在其protected声明区增加如下内容:
//去掉安全警告 BEGIN
DECLARE_INTERFACE_MAP()
BEGIN_INTERFACE_PART(ObjectSafety, IObjectSafety)
STDMETHOD(GetInterfaceSafetyOptions)(REFIID riid, DWORD __RPC_FAR *pdwSupportedOptions, DWORD __RPC_FAR *pdwEnabledOptions);
STDMETHOD(SetInterfaceSafetyOptions)(REFIID riid, DWORD dwOptionSetMask, DWORD dwEnabledOptions);
END_INTERFACE_PART(ObjectSafety)
//去掉安全警告 END
1.1.3 在CDemoCtl的实现类.cpp的IMPLEMENT_DYNCREATE(CActivexFirstCtrl, COleControl)这一行后增加如下内容:
//去掉安全警告 BEGIN
BEGIN_INTERFACE_MAP(CHJFaceActiveCtrl, COleControl)
    INTERFACE_PART(CHJFaceActiveCtrl, IID_IObjectSafety, ObjectSafety)
END_INTERFACE_MAP()

// Implementation of IObjectSafety
STDMETHODIMP CHJFaceActiveCtrl::XObjectSafety::GetInterfaceSafetyOptions(
REFIID riid,
DWORD __RPC_FAR *pdwSupportedOptions,
DWORD __RPC_FAR *pdwEnabledOptions)
{
    METHOD_PROLOGUE_EX(CHJFaceActiveCtrl, ObjectSafety)
    if (!pdwSupportedOptions || !pdwEnabledOptions)
    {
        return E_POINTER;
    }
    *pdwSupportedOptions = INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER | INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA;
    *pdwEnabledOptions = 0;
    if (NULL == pThis->GetInterface(&riid))
    {
        TRACE("Requested interface is not supported.\n");
        return E_NOINTERFACE;
    }
    // What interface is being checked out anyhow?
    OLECHAR szGUID[39];
    int i = StringFromGUID2(riid, szGUID, 39);
    if (riid == IID_IDispatch)
    {
        // Client wants to know if object is safe for scripting
        *pdwEnabledOptions = INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER;
        return S_OK;
    }
    else if (riid == IID_IPersistPropertyBag
    || riid == IID_IPersistStreamInit
    || riid == IID_IPersistStorage
    || riid == IID_IPersistMemory)
    {
        // Those are the persistence interfaces COleControl derived controls support
        // as indicated in AFXCTL.H
        // Client wants to know if object is safe for initializing from persistent data
        *pdwEnabledOptions = INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA;
        return S_OK;
    }
    else
    {
        // Find out what interface this is, and decide what options to enable
        TRACE("We didn't account for the safety of this interface, and it's one we support...\n");
        return E_NOINTERFACE;
    }
}

STDMETHODIMP CHJFaceActiveCtrl::XObjectSafety::SetInterfaceSafetyOptions(
REFIID riid,
DWORD dwOptionSetMask,
DWORD dwEnabledOptions)
{
    METHOD_PROLOGUE_EX(CHJFaceActiveCtrl, ObjectSafety)
    OLECHAR szGUID[39];
    // What is this interface anyway?
    // We can do a quick lookup in the registry under HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Interface
    int i = StringFromGUID2(riid, szGUID, 39);
    if (0 == dwOptionSetMask && 0 == dwEnabledOptions)
    {
        // the control certainly supports NO requests through the specified interface
        // so it"s safe to return S_OK even if the interface isn"t supported.
        return S_OK;
    }
    // Do we support the specified interface?
    if (NULL == pThis->GetInterface(&riid))
    {
        TRACE1("%s is not support.\n", szGUID);
        return E_FAIL;
    }
    if (riid == IID_IDispatch)
    {
        TRACE("Client asking if it's safe to call through IDispatch.\n");
        TRACE("In other words, is the control safe for scripting?\n");
        if (INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER == dwOptionSetMask && INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER == dwEnabledOptions)
        {
            return S_OK;
        }
        else
        {
            return E_FAIL;
        }
    }
    else if (riid == IID_IPersistPropertyBag
    || riid == IID_IPersistStreamInit
    || riid == IID_IPersistStorage
    || riid == IID_IPersistMemory)
    {
        TRACE("Client asking if it's safe to call through IPersist*.\n");
        TRACE("In other words, is the control safe for initializing from persistent data?\n");
        if (INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA == dwOptionSetMask && INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA == dwEnabledOptions)
        {
            return NOERROR;
        }
        else
        {
            return E_FAIL;
        }
    }
    else
    {
        TRACE1("We didn't account for the safety of %s, and it's one we support...\n", szGUID);
        return E_FAIL;
    }
}
STDMETHODIMP_(ULONG) CHJFaceActiveCtrl::XObjectSafety::AddRef()
{
    METHOD_PROLOGUE_EX_(CHJFaceActiveCtrl, ObjectSafety)
    return (ULONG)pThis->ExternalAddRef();
}
STDMETHODIMP_(ULONG) CHJFaceActiveCtrl::XObjectSafety::Release()
{
    METHOD_PROLOGUE_EX_(CHJFaceActiveCtrl, ObjectSafety)
    return (ULONG)pThis->ExternalRelease();
}
STDMETHODIMP CHJFaceActiveCtrl::XObjectSafety::QueryInterface(REFIID iid, LPVOID* ppvObj)
{
    METHOD_PROLOGUE_EX_(CHJFaceActiveCtrl, ObjectSafety)
    return (HRESULT)pThis->ExternalQueryInterface(&iid, ppvObj);
}
//去掉安全警告 END

posted on   carekee  阅读(7872)  评论(0编辑  收藏  举报
编辑推荐:
· 10年+ .NET Coder 心语,封装的思维:从隐藏、稳定开始理解其本质意义
· .NET Core 中如何实现缓存的预热?
· 从 HTTP 原因短语缺失研究 HTTP/2 和 HTTP/3 的设计差异
· AI与.NET技术实操系列:向量存储与相似性搜索在 .NET 中的实现
· 基于Microsoft.Extensions.AI核心库实现RAG应用
阅读排行:
· 10年+ .NET Coder 心语 ── 封装的思维:从隐藏、稳定开始理解其本质意义
· 地球OL攻略 —— 某应届生求职总结
· 提示词工程——AI应用必不可少的技术
· Open-Sora 2.0 重磅开源!
· 周边上新:园子的第一款马克杯温暖上架
< 2025年3月 >
23 24 25 26 27 28 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 1 2 3 4 5

点击右上角即可分享
微信分享提示