ES搜索排序,文档相关度评分介绍——Field-length norm
Field-length norm
How long is the field? The shorter the field, the higher the weight. If a term appears in a short field, such as a title
field, it is more likely that the content of that field is about the term than if the same term appears in a much bigger body
field. The field length norm is calculated as follows:
norm(d) = 1 / √numTerms

While the field-length norm is important for full-text search, many other fields don’t need norms. Norms consume approximately 1 byte per string
field per document in the index, whether or not a document contains the field. Exact-value not_analyzed
string fields have norms disabled by default, but you can use the field mapping to disable norms on analyzed
fields as well:
PUT /my_index
{
"mappings": {
"doc": {
"properties": {
"text": {
"type": "string",
"norms": { "enabled": false }
}
}
}
}
}
For use cases such as logging, norms are not useful. All you care about is whether a field contains a particular error code or a particular browser identifier. The length of the field does not affect the outcome. Disabling norms can save a significant amount of memory.
These three factors—term frequency, inverse document frequency, and field-length norm—are calculated and stored at index time. Together, they are used to calculate the weight of a single term in a particular document.

When we refer to documents in the preceding formulae, we are actually talking about a field within a document. Each field has its own inverted index and thus, for TF/IDF purposes, the value of the field is the value of the document.
When we run a simple term
query with explain
set to true
(see Understanding the Score), you will see that the only factors involved in calculating the score are the ones explained in the preceding sections:
PUT /my_index/doc/1
{ "text" : "quick brown fox" }
GET /my_index/doc/_search?explain
{
"query": {
"term": {
"text": "fox"
}
}
}
The (abbreviated) explanation
from the preceding request is as follows:
weight(text:fox in 0) [PerFieldSimilarity]: 0.15342641

result of: fieldWeight in 0 0.15342641 product of: tf(freq=1.0), with freq of 1: 1.0

idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=1): 0.30685282

fieldNorm(doc=0): 0.5

Of course, queries usually consist of more than one term, so we need a way of combining the weights of multiple terms. For this, we turn to the vector space model.
【推荐】国内首个AI IDE,深度理解中文开发场景,立即下载体验Trae
【推荐】编程新体验,更懂你的AI,立即体验豆包MarsCode编程助手
【推荐】抖音旗下AI助手豆包,你的智能百科全书,全免费不限次数
【推荐】轻量又高性能的 SSH 工具 IShell:AI 加持,快人一步
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 探究高空视频全景AR技术的实现原理
· 理解Rust引用及其生命周期标识(上)
· 浏览器原生「磁吸」效果!Anchor Positioning 锚点定位神器解析
· 没有源码,如何修改代码逻辑?
· 全程不用写代码,我用AI程序员写了一个飞机大战
· MongoDB 8.0这个新功能碉堡了,比商业数据库还牛
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 白话解读 Dapr 1.15:你的「微服务管家」又秀新绝活了
· DeepSeek 开源周回顾「GitHub 热点速览」