Dapr牵手.NET学习笔记:Actor一个场景
接上一篇最后的场景,为了解决相同帐户并发引起的数据库行级锁,可以引入Actor的串机制,相同ActorID的实例,串行,这样就能在应用层把读取余额的资源争抢解决掉,剩下的工作就是一定时间间隔,把内存中的数据批量更新到数据库中,大大减少了数据库的资源占用。
不废话了,看实现代码吧。
IAccountActor接口
public interface IAccountActor : IActor
{
Task<decimal> ChargeAsync(decimal amount);
}
AccountActor实现
using Dapr.Actors.Runtime;
using IOrderFactoryActory.Interfaces;
namespace OrderFactoryService
{
public class AccountActor : Actor, IAccountActor
{
public AccountActor(ActorHost host) : base(host)
{
}
public async Task<decimal> ChargeAsync(decimal amount)
{
var balance = 0m;
var balanceValue = await this.StateManager.TryGetStateAsync<decimal>("balance");
if (balanceValue.HasValue)
{
balance = balanceValue.Value;
}
balance += amount;
await this.StateManager.SetStateAsync<decimal>("balance", balance);
return balance;
}
}
}
asp.net 6引入dapr.actor
using OrderFactoryService;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting;
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services.AddControllers();
builder.Services.AddEndpointsApiExplorer();
builder.Services.AddSwaggerGen();
builder.Services.AddActors(options =>
{
options.HttpEndpoint = "http://localhost:3999";
options.Actors.RegisterActor<AccountActor>();
});
var app = builder.Build();
if (app.Environment.IsDevelopment())
{
app.UseSwagger();
app.UseSwaggerUI();
}
app.UseAuthorization();
app.UseRouting();
app.UseEndpoints(endpoints =>
{
endpoints.MapActorsHandlers();
});
app.MapControllers();
app.Run();
客户端调用我是模拟一次50并发,当然也可以也可以换成web api,自动同步用了一个Job框架Quartz.Net,与Charge操作分离。
using Dapr.Actors;
using Dapr.Actors.Client;
using IOrderFactoryActory.Interfaces;
using Quartz;
using Quartz.Impl;
using System.Security.Cryptography;
Console.WriteLine("回车开始");
Console.ReadLine();
var scheduler = await RunJobAsync();
var factory = new ActorProxyFactory(new ActorProxyOptions { HttpEndpoint = "http://localhost:3999" });
var accountNo = "808080808080808080";
var account = CreateActor(factory, accountNo);
var total = 0m;
while (true)
{
var tasks = new List<Task>();
for (var i = 0; i < 50; i++)
{
var amount = RandomNumberGenerator.GetInt32(100, 5000);
var chargeTask = new Task(async () =>
{
var balance = await account.ChargeAsync(amount);
Console.WriteLine($"**** 账户:{accountNo} 本次存款:{amount} 缓存余额:{balance} ****");
});
tasks.Add(chargeTask);
total += amount;
}
foreach (var task in tasks)
{
task.Start();
}
Console.WriteLine($"全部存款汇总:{total}");
Console.WriteLine("回车继续发一批,退出按E");
if (Console.ReadLine() == "E")
{
break;
}
}
await scheduler.Shutdown();
static IAccountActor CreateActor(ActorProxyFactory factory, string accountNo)
{
var actorType = "AccountActor";
var actorId = new ActorId(accountNo);
return factory.CreateActorProxy<IAccountActor>(actorId, actorType);
}
static async Task<IScheduler> RunJobAsync()
{
var factory = new StdSchedulerFactory();
var scheduler = await factory.GetScheduler();
await scheduler.Start();
var job = JobBuilder.Create<SavaAccountJob>()
.WithIdentity("SavaAccountJob", "SavaAccountGroup")
.Build();
var trigger = TriggerBuilder.Create()
.WithIdentity("SavaAccountTrigger", "SavaAccountGroup")
.StartNow()
.WithSimpleSchedule(x => x
.WithIntervalInSeconds(10)
.RepeatForever())
.Build();
await scheduler.ScheduleJob(job, trigger);
return scheduler;
}
class SavaAccountJob : IJob
{
static decimal total = 0;
public async Task Execute(IJobExecutionContext context)
{
var accountNo = "808080808080808080";
var actorType = "AccountActor";
var actorId = new ActorId(accountNo);
var factory = new ActorProxyFactory(new ActorProxyOptions { HttpEndpoint = "http://localhost:3999" });
var account = factory.CreateActorProxy<IAccountActor>(actorId, actorType);
var balance = await account.ChargeAsync(0m);
total += balance;
var newBalance = account.ChargeAsync(-balance).Result;
Console.ForegroundColor = ConsoleColor.Green;
Console.WriteLine($"账户:{accountNo} 处理余额:{balance} 定时处理完后余额:{newBalance} 总体余额:{total}");
Console.ResetColor();
}
}
测试时,不停的按回车,一段时间后查看“全部存款汇总”和后台任务处理的“总体余额”是否相等,相等的话说明多批次存款和多批次保存余额的数值相等,没有丢失败数据。
本质上,这里是把数据库的行级锁,转换成了调用方法的串行(方法里缓存计算数据)化。
想要更快更方便的了解相关知识,可以关注微信公众号
****欢迎关注我的asp.net core系统课程****
《asp.net core精要讲解》 https://ke.qq.com/course/265696
《asp.net core 3.0》 https://ke.qq.com/course/437517
《asp.net core项目实战》 https://ke.qq.com/course/291868
《基于.net core微服务》 https://ke.qq.com/course/299524
《asp.net core精要讲解》 https://ke.qq.com/course/265696
《asp.net core 3.0》 https://ke.qq.com/course/437517
《asp.net core项目实战》 https://ke.qq.com/course/291868
《基于.net core微服务》 https://ke.qq.com/course/299524