[WCF权限控制]利用WCF自定义授权模式提供当前Principal[实例篇]
在《原理篇》中我们谈到:如果采用自定义安全主体权限模式,我们可以通过自定义AuthorizationPolicy或者ServiceAuthorizationManager实现对基于当前认证用于相关的安全主体的提供,进而达到授权的目的。为了让大家对此有个更加深刻的认识,在这篇文章中我们会提供一个具体的例子。[源代码从这里下载]
目录:
一、创建自定义AuthorizationPolicy
二、创建自定义ServiceAuthorizationManager
三、通过自定义AuthorizationPolicy实现授权
四、通过自定义ServiceAuthorizationManager实现授权
一、创建自定义AuthorizationPolicy
我们先来演示通过自定义AuthorizationPolicy以提供当前安全主体的方式。我们通过自定义AuthorizationPolicy实现这样的授权策略:如果用户名为Foo(假设为管理员),我们创建一个包含“Administrators”角色的安全主体;而对于其他的用户,提供的安全主体的角色列表中仅仅包括“Guest”。我们为该自定义AuthorizationPolicy起名为SimpleAdministrators,SimpleAdministrators整个定义如下。
1: public class SimpleAuthorizationPolicy : IAuthorizationPolicy
2: {
3: public SimpleAuthorizationPolicy()
4: {
5: this.Id = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
6: }
7: public bool Evaluate(EvaluationContext evaluationContext, ref object state)
8: {
9: string userName = string.Empty;
10: foreach (ClaimSet claimSet in evaluationContext.ClaimSets)
11: {
12: foreach (Claim claim in claimSet.FindClaims(ClaimTypes.Name, Rights.PossessProperty))
13: {
14: userName = (string)claim.Resource;
15: }
16: }
17:
18: if (userName.Contains('\\'))
19: {
20: userName = userName.Split('\\')[1];
21: }
22: evaluationContext.Properties["Principal"] = GetPrincipal(userName);
23: return false;
24: }
25:
26: private IPrincipal GetPrincipal(string userName)
27: {
28: GenericIdentity identity = new GenericIdentity(userName);
29: if (string.Compare("Foo", userName, true) == 0)
30: {
31: return new GenericPrincipal(identity, new string[] { "Administrators" });
32: }
33: return new GenericPrincipal(identity, new string[] {"Guest" });
34: }
35:
36: public ClaimSet Issuer
37: {
38: get { return ClaimSet.System; }
39: }
40: public string Id { get; private set; }
41: }
这个安全主体的提供实现在Evaluate方法中,而其中唯一值得一提的是当前认证用户名的获取。在客户端被成功认证之后,被认证的用户实际上也通过某个声明(Claim)保存下来。该声明的类型为“http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/05/identity/claims/name”,可以通过ClaimTypes的静态属性Name得到。而该Claim对象的Resource就是用户名。在得到当前认证用户名之后,相应的GenericPrincipal对象被创建出来,并被置于EvaluationContext的属性列表中。并且该属性对应的Key为“Principal”。
二、创建自定义ServiceAuthorizationManager
接下来我们来通过自定义ServiceAuthorizationManager来实现与上面完全一样的功能,而已授权策略很简单,我们照例将该自定义ServiceAuthorizationManager起名为SimpleServiceAuthorizationManager。以下是SimpleServiceAuthorizationManager的定义。
1: public class SimpleServiceAuthorizationManager : ServiceAuthorizationManager
2: {
3: protected override bool CheckAccessCore(OperationContext operationContext)
4: {
5: string userName = operationContext.ServiceSecurityContext.PrimaryIdentity.Name;
6: if (userName.Contains('\\'))
7: {
8: userName = userName.Split('\\')[1];
9: }
10: operationContext.ServiceSecurityContext.AuthorizationContext.Properties["Principal"] = GetPrincipal(userName);
11: return true;
12: }
13: private IPrincipal GetPrincipal(string userName)
14: {
15: GenericIdentity identity = new GenericIdentity(userName);
16: if (string.Compare("Foo", userName, true) == 0)
17: {
18: return new GenericPrincipal(identity, new string[] { "Administrators"});
19: }
20: return new GenericPrincipal(identity, new string[] { "Guest" });
21: }
22: }
和自定义AuthorizationPolicy不同的是,认证用户的获取在这里变得更加容易,我们直接可以通过当前ServiceSecurityContext的PrimaryIdentity获取。需要提醒一下的是,如果你在自定义AuthorizationPolicy的Evaluate方法中调用该属性,会出现一个StackOverflowException异常,因为该属性的调用本身又会触发Evaluate方法的调用。最后被创建的GnericPrincipal被保存在当前AuthorizationContext的属性列表中,属性的Key依然是“Principal”。
三、通过自定义AuthorizationPolicy实现授权
现在我们常见一个实例程序来应用我们创建的自定义AuthorizationPolicy,看看它是否能够起到我们期望的授权的作用。我们依然沿用我们再熟悉不过的计算服务的例子,解决方案依然按照如下图所示的结构来设计。整个解决方式包括四个项目:Contracts、Services、Hosting和Client。对于这样的结构我们已经了解得够多了,在这里没有必要再赘言叙述了。
在实例解决方案的整个结构建立之后,我们分别在Contracts和Services项目中定义服务契约接口和服务类型。下面是契约接口ICalculator和服务CalculatorService的定义。而在CalculatorService类的Add方法中应用了PrincipalPermissionAttribute特性,并将Roles属性设置成了Adminstrators,意味着该服务操作只能被管理员用户组中的用户调用。
1: [ServiceContract(Namespace = "http://www.artech.com/")]
2: public interface ICalculator
3: {
4: [OperationContract]
5: double Add(double x, double y);
6: }
7:
8: public class CalculatorService : ICalculator
9: {
10: [PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Role = "Administrators")]
11: public double Add(double x, double y)
12: {
13: return x + y;
14: }
15: }
现在通过Hosting这个控制台程序对上面创建的服务进行寄宿。下面给出的是整个寄宿程序的配置,从中我们可以看出:应用到CalculatorService的服务行为列表中包含了PrincipalPermissionMode为Custom的ServiceAuthorizationBehavior。而我们定义的SimpleAuthorizationPolicy类型被配置到了<authorizationPolicies>列表中。
1: <?xml version="1.0"?>
2: <configuration>
3: <system.serviceModel>
4: <services>
5: <service name="Artech.WcfServices.Services.CalculatorService" behaviorConfiguration="useCustomAuthorization">
6: <endpoint address="http://127.0.0.1/calculatorservice" binding="ws2007HttpBinding" contract="Artech.WcfServices.Contracts.ICalculator"/>
7: </service>
8: </services>
9: <behaviors>
10: <serviceBehaviors>
11: <behavior name="useCustomAuthorization">
12: <serviceAuthorization principalPermissionMode="Custom" >
13: <authorizationPolicies >
14: <add policyType="Artech.WcfServices.Hosting.SimpleAuthorizationPolicy, Artech.WcfServices.Hosting" />
15: </authorizationPolicies>
16: </serviceAuthorization>
17: <serviceDebug includeExceptionDetailInFaults="true"/>
18: </behavior>
19: </serviceBehaviors>
20: </behaviors>
21: </system.serviceModel>
22: </configuration>
由于我们使用了WSHttpBinding,而它在默认的情况下采用Windows客户端凭证,为此我们需要创建两个Windows帐号Foo和Bar,密码被设定为Password。在如下所示的客户端代码中,我们分别以Foo和Bar的名义调用了服务。最后将服务能够成功调用的结果打印出来。
1: class Program
2: {
3: static void Main(string[] args)
4: {
5: ChannelFactory<ICalculator> channelFactory = new ChannelFactory<ICalculator>("calculatorService");
6: NetworkCredential credential = channelFactory.Credentials.Windows.ClientCredential;
7: credential.UserName = "Foo";
8: credential.Password = "Password";
9: ICalculator calculator = channelFactory.CreateChannel();
10: Invoke(calculator);
11:
12: channelFactory = new ChannelFactory<ICalculator>("calculatorService");
13: credential = channelFactory.Credentials.Windows.ClientCredential;
14: credential.UserName = "Bar";
15: credential.Password = "Password";
16: calculator = channelFactory.CreateChannel();
17: Invoke(calculator);
18:
19: Console.Read();
20: }
21: static void Invoke(ICalculator calculator)
22: {
23: try
24: {
25: calculator.Add(1, 2);
26: Console.WriteLine("服务调用成功...");
27: }
28: catch (Exception ex)
29: {
30: Console.WriteLine("服务调用失败...");
31: }
32: }
33: }
从下面的结果来看,只有在用户名为Foo才能成功调用服务,而Bar由于权限不足会导致服务调用失败。这充分证明了通过自定义AuthorizationPolicy能够正确地起到授权的作用。
1: 服务调用成功...
2: 服务调用失败...
四、通过自定义ServiceAuthorizationManager实现授权
在证明我们自定义的AuthorizationPolicy确实能够按照我们定义的策略进行授权之后,我们来试试我们自定义的ServiceAuthorizationManager能否同样完成授权的使命。为此我们唯一需要做的就是改变一下服务寄宿程序的配置。
1: <?xml version="1.0"?>
2: <configuration>
3: <system.serviceModel>
4: <services>
5: <service name="Artech.WcfServices.Services.CalculatorService" behaviorConfiguration="useCustomAuthorization">
6: <endpoint address="http://127.0.0.1/calculatorservice" binding="ws2007HttpBinding"
7: contract="Artech.WcfServices.Contracts.ICalculator"/>
8: </service>
9: </services>
10: <behaviors>
11: <serviceBehaviors>
12: <behavior name="useCustomAuthorization">
13: <serviceAuthorization principalPermissionMode="Custom"
14: serviceAuthorizationManagerType="Artech.WcfServices.Hosting.SimpleServiceAuthorizationManager,
15: Artech.WcfServices.Hosting" >
16: <!--<authorizationPolicies >
17: <add policyType="Artech.WcfServices.Hosting.SimpleAuthorizationPolicy, Artech.WcfServices.Hosting" />
18: </authorizationPolicies>-->
19: </serviceAuthorization>
20: <serviceDebug includeExceptionDetailInFaults="true"/>
21: </behavior>
22: </serviceBehaviors>
23: </behaviors>
24: </system.serviceModel>
25: </configuration>
上面所示的采用自定义ServiceAuthorizationManager实现授权的配置。我们将之前添加的AuthorizationPolicy注释掉,然后通过ServiceAuthorizationBehavior配置节的serviceAuthorizationManagerType属性设置成我们自定义的SimpleServiceAuthorizationManager的类型。运行程序后,你会得到和上面一样的输出结果。
1: 服务调用成功...
2: 服务调用失败...
[WCF权限控制]利用WCF自定义授权模式提供当前安全主体[原理篇]
[WCF权限控制]利用WCF自定义授权模式提供当前安全主体[实例篇]