Android Touch事件传递机制详解 上
最近总是遇到关于Android Touch事件的问题,如:滑动冲突的问题,以前也花时间学习过Android Touch事件的传递机制,可以每次用起来的时候总是忘记了,索性自己总结一下写篇文章避免以后忘记了,其实网上关于Touch事件的传递的文章真的很多,但是很少有系统性的,都是写了一个简单的demo运行了一下,对于我们了解Android Touch事件基本上没有任何帮助。
今天我打算从源码的角度来分析一下Touch事件的传递机制。在了解Touch事件之前,最好了解下Android中窗口的创建过程,这样对于Android窗口的整体结构和事件的传递过程会了解更深。
我就把事件的始点定在PhoneWindow中的DecorView吧,至于是谁把事件传递给DecorView的我们先不用去关心它。(如果想深入研究,请阅读我的另外一篇文章Android中按键事件传递机制)我们只需要知道它的上家是通过dispatchTouchEvent方法将事件分发给DecorView就行了,我进入到该方法瞧瞧究竟。
在阅读之前最好阅读Android窗口创建过程
- @Override
- public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev)
- {
- //该Callback就是该DecorView附属的Activity,可以看我的另外一篇文章《Android中窗口的创建过程》
- final Callback cb = getCallback();
- //如果cb!=null && mFeatureId<0 就执行Activity中的dispatchTouchEvent方法,对于应用程序窗口 <span > </span> //这两个条件一般是满足的
- return cb != null && mFeatureId < 0 ? cb.dispatchTouchEvent(ev) : super
- .dispatchTouchEvent(ev);
- }
在DecorView中事件通过dispatchTouchEvent方法被分发到了Activity中,相信Activity对于每个Android开发者都不会陌生吧,那我们就进入Activity的dispatchTouchEvent方法中。
- public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
- if (ev.getAction() == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
- onUserInteraction();
- }
- //getWindow返回什么?如果阅读过我的《Android中窗口创建过程》的都知道就是PhoneWindow,如果PhoneWindow中的superDispatchTouchEvent方法返回了true,
- //那么该Touch事件就被PhoneWindow给消费掉了,不会再继续传递,如果返回false,那么就会执行Activity的onTouchEvent方法
- if (getWindow().superDispatchTouchEvent(ev)) {
- return true;
- }
- return onTouchEvent(ev);
- }
进入PhoneWindow中的superDispatchTouchEvent方法:
- @Override
- public boolean superDispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
- //mDecor是一个DecorView类型变量
- return mDecor.superDispatchTouchEvent(event);
- }
进入DecorView中的superDispatchTouchEvent方法:
- public boolean superDispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
- //直接调用父类的dispatchTouchEvent方法
- return super.dispatchTouchEvent(event);
- }
走到这里我们先暂停一下,会看一下DecorView类的dispatchTouchEvent方法,如果callBack不为空,那么调用CallBack的dispatchTouchEvent方法,否则调用super.dispatchTouchEvent方法,但是在CallBack不为空的条件下最中也是调用到了super.dispatchTouchEvent方法,那么它的super是哪个那,我们继续往下看:
通过源码我们可以看到DecorView是继承自FrameLayout。所以事件最终是传递到了FrameLayout的dispatchTouchEvent中,FrameLayout中的此方法是继承自ViewGroup的,我们直接到ViewGroup中查看此方法吧:
- @Override
- public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
- final int action = ev.getAction();
- final float xf = ev.getX();
- final float yf = ev.getY();
- final float scrolledXFloat = xf + mScrollX;
- final float scrolledYFloat = yf + mScrollY;
- final Rect frame = mTempRect;
- //可以通过requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent方法来设置该变量的值,通常是false
- boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
- if (action == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
- if (mMotionTarget != null) {
- // this is weird, we got a pen down, but we thought it was
- // already down!
- // XXX: We should probably send an ACTION_UP to the current
- // target.
- mMotionTarget = null;
- }
- // If we're disallowing intercept or if we're allowing and we didn't
- // intercept
- //onInterceptTouchEvent在默认情况下是返回false的,所以这里通常是可以进去的
- if (disallowIntercept || !onInterceptTouchEvent(ev)) {
- // reset this event's action (just to protect ourselves)
- ev.setAction(MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN);
- // We know we want to dispatch the event down, find a child
- // who can handle it, start with the front-most child.
- final int scrolledXInt = (int) scrolledXFloat;
- final int scrolledYInt = (int) scrolledYFloat;
- final View[] children = mChildren;
- final int count = mChildrenCount;
- //遍历ViewGroup的孩子,如果触摸点在某一个子View中,则调用在子View的dispatchTouchEvent
- for (int i = count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- final View child = children[i];
- if ((child.mViewFlags & VISIBILITY_MASK) == VISIBLE
- || child.getAnimation() != null) {
- child.getHitRect(frame);
- if (frame.contains(scrolledXInt, scrolledYInt)) {
- // offset the event to the view's coordinate system
- final float xc = scrolledXFloat - child.mLeft;
- final float yc = scrolledYFloat - child.mTop;
- ev.setLocation(xc, yc);
- child.mPrivateFlags &= ~CANCEL_NEXT_UP_EVENT;
- //调用了某一个子View 的dispatchTouchEvent ,如果这个子View 的dispatchTouchEvent返回true,那么意味着这个事件
- //已经被这个子View消费了,不会继续传递
- if (child.dispatchTouchEvent(ev)) {
- // Event handled, we have a target now.
- mMotionTarget = child;
- return true;
- }
- // The event didn't get handled, try the next view.
- // Don't reset the event's location, it's not
- // necessary here.
- }
- }
- }
- }
- }
- boolean isUpOrCancel = (action == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP) ||
- (action == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL);
- if (isUpOrCancel) {
- // Note, we've already copied the previous state to our local
- // variable, so this takes effect on the next event
- mGroupFlags &= ~FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT;
- }
- // The event wasn't an ACTION_DOWN, dispatch it to our target if
- // we have one.
- final View target = mMotionTarget;
- //对于一个Action_down事件,如果走到了这里,说明所有的子View 都没有消费掉这个事件,那么它就调用父类的
- //的dispatchTouchEvnet方法,ViewGroup的父类就是View
- if (target == null) {
- // We don't have a target, this means we're handling the
- // event as a regular view.
- ev.setLocation(xf, yf);
- if ((mPrivateFlags & CANCEL_NEXT_UP_EVENT) != 0) {
- ev.setAction(MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL);
- mPrivateFlags &= ~CANCEL_NEXT_UP_EVENT;
- }
- return super.dispatchTouchEvent(ev);
- }
- // if have a target, see if we're allowed to and want to intercept its
- // events
- if (!disallowIntercept && onInterceptTouchEvent(ev)) {
- final float xc = scrolledXFloat - (float) target.mLeft;
- final float yc = scrolledYFloat - (float) target.mTop;
- mPrivateFlags &= ~CANCEL_NEXT_UP_EVENT;
- ev.setAction(MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL);
- ev.setLocation(xc, yc);
- if (!target.dispatchTouchEvent(ev)) {
- // target didn't handle ACTION_CANCEL. not much we can do
- // but they should have.
- }
- // clear the target
- mMotionTarget = null;
- // Don't dispatch this event to our own view, because we already
- // saw it when intercepting; we just want to give the following
- // event to the normal onTouchEvent().
- return true;
- }
- if (isUpOrCancel) {
- mMotionTarget = null;
- }
- // finally offset the event to the target's coordinate system and
- // dispatch the event.
- final float xc = scrolledXFloat - (float) target.mLeft;
- final float yc = scrolledYFloat - (float) target.mTop;
- ev.setLocation(xc, yc);
- if ((target.mPrivateFlags & CANCEL_NEXT_UP_EVENT) != 0) {
- ev.setAction(MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL);
- target.mPrivateFlags &= ~CANCEL_NEXT_UP_EVENT;
- mMotionTarget = null;
- }
- return target.dispatchTouchEvent(ev);
- }
刚才在看ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvent方法时,我们看到了一个方法onInterceptTouchEvent,这个方法是干什么的呢,我们先看看他都干了什么吧
- public boolean onInterceptTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
- return false;
- }
发现里面就是返回了一个false, 通过方法名字我们就可以知道该方法的作用,是否阻止TouchEvent的传递,默认是false 也就是不会阻止。
现在总结一下ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvnet的逻辑 ,毕竟这个方法有些复杂:
1、如果disallowIntercept|| !onInterceptTouchEvent(),那么事件才可以继续传递下去,否则直接调用该ViewGroup的父类的dispatchTouchEvent,也就是View的dispatchTouchEvent.
2、依次遍历ViewGroup的所有子View,将事件传递个子View,如果某一个子View处理了该事件,并且返回true,那么事件结束,停止传递
3、如果所有的子View没有消费掉这个事件,那么就调用View的dispatchTouchEvent
对于任何一款Android应用,展现给用户最上面的通常就是一个View,如Button,ImageView等等,也就是说一些触摸事件最终都是传递给了这个控件,如果控件消费了这些事件,那么就停止传递了,如果没有消费,那么就交给控件所属ViewGroup的onTouchEvnet处理,我们就看看View的dispatchTouchEvent方法吧
- public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
- if (mOnTouchListener != null && (mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED &&
- mOnTouchListener.onTouch(this, event)) {
- return true;
- }
- return onTouchEvent(event);
- }
View的这个方法非常简单,首先判断mTouchListener是否为空,并且这个View是否Eneable,如果都满足,那么首先调用mOnTouchListener.onTouch方法,如果onTouch方法返回true,那么就是说这个View消费了该事件,直接返回true,如果onTouch返回false,那么就会调用onTouchEvnet方法,这个mOnTouchListener是什么?
- public void setOnTouchListener(OnTouchListener l) {
- mOnTouchListener = l;
- }
看了这个就明白了吧,就是我们通过setOnTouchListener赋值的,另外我们还需要注意一点就是这个onTouch是在onTouchEvent方法之前执行的哦。
最后我们就看看这个View的onTouchEvnet吧
- public boolean onTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
- final int viewFlags = mViewFlags;
- //(A)
- if ((viewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == DISABLED) {
- // A disabled view that is clickable still consumes the touch
- // events, it just doesn't respond to them.
- return (((viewFlags & CLICKABLE) == CLICKABLE ||
- (viewFlags & LONG_CLICKABLE) == LONG_CLICKABLE));
- }
- if (mTouchDelegate != null) {
- if (mTouchDelegate.onTouchEvent(event)) {
- return true;
- }
- }
- //(B)
- if (((viewFlags & CLICKABLE) == CLICKABLE ||
- (viewFlags & LONG_CLICKABLE) == LONG_CLICKABLE)) {
- switch (event.getAction()) {
- case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP:
- boolean prepressed = (mPrivateFlags & PREPRESSED) != 0;
- if ((mPrivateFlags & PRESSED) != 0 || prepressed) {
- // take focus if we don't have it already and we should in
- // touch mode.
- boolean focusTaken = false;
- if (isFocusable() && isFocusableInTouchMode() && !isFocused()) {
- focusTaken = requestFocus();
- }
- if (!mHasPerformedLongPress) {
- // This is a tap, so remove the longpress check
- removeLongPressCallback();
- // Only perform take click actions if we were in the pressed state
- if (!focusTaken) {
- // Use a Runnable and post this rather than calling
- // performClick directly. This lets other visual state
- // of the view update before click actions start.
- if (mPerformClick == null) {
- mPerformClick = new PerformClick();
- }
- //(C)
- if (!post(mPerformClick)) {
- performClick();
- }
- }
- }
- if (mUnsetPressedState == null) {
- mUnsetPressedState = new UnsetPressedState();
- }
- if (prepressed) {
- mPrivateFlags |= PRESSED;
- refreshDrawableState();
- postDelayed(mUnsetPressedState,
- ViewConfiguration.getPressedStateDuration());
- } else if (!post(mUnsetPressedState)) {
- // If the post failed, unpress right now
- mUnsetPressedState.run();
- }
- removeTapCallback();
- }
- break;
- case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN:
- if (mPendingCheckForTap == null) {
- mPendingCheckForTap = new CheckForTap();
- }
- mPrivateFlags |= PREPRESSED;
- mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
- postDelayed(mPendingCheckForTap, ViewConfiguration.getTapTimeout());
- break;
- case MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL:
- mPrivateFlags &= ~PRESSED;
- refreshDrawableState();
- removeTapCallback();
- break;
- case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE:
- final int x = (int) event.getX();
- final int y = (int) event.getY();
- // Be lenient about moving outside of buttons
- int slop = mTouchSlop;
- if ((x < 0 - slop) || (x >= getWidth() + slop) ||
- (y < 0 - slop) || (y >= getHeight() + slop)) {
- // Outside button
- removeTapCallback();
- if ((mPrivateFlags & PRESSED) != 0) {
- // Remove any future long press/tap checks
- removeLongPressCallback();
- // Need to switch from pressed to not pressed
- mPrivateFlags &= ~PRESSED;
- refreshDrawableState();
- }
- }
- break;
- }
- //(D)
- return true;
- }
- return false;
- }
这个方法也是相当的复杂啊,但是我们没有必要每一行都看,我们只需要挑重点看就Ok了。
请细看我标了 A B C D的四个地方,在A处,如果该View是Disable的,那么只要该View是clickable或者longclickable的,那么这个事件就被该View消费掉了,返回true
在看B 和 D,两处,如果该View是clickable或者longclickable的,那么D出总是返回true,也就是说事件一直被消费,至于C处我主要是说明的是View的onClick事件是在ACTION_UP中触发的。
学习到这里,我又需要总结一下:
如果我们触摸的一个View是clickable或者longclickable的,那么这个事件肯定会被这个View消费掉(当然前提是你没有改写它所在ViewGroup的onInterceptTouchEvent方法,如果你改写此方法返回true,那么View是无法接收到这个事件的)
我们现在还要思考一个问题,如果这个View没有消费掉这个事件,这个事件最终抛向何方?
还记得前面我说过ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvent方法吗,如果它的所有的子View没有处理掉该事件,那么调用的是父类View的dispatchTouchEvnet方法,从而执行到了该ViewGroup的onTouch和onTouchEvent方法。
那如果ViewGroup也没有处理该事件呢,这里就要分两种情况啦:
1、如果这个ViewGroup不是DecorView,也就是说他的父View就是一个普通的ViewGroup(如LinearLayout里面放置一个LinearLayout),那么和上面子View没有处理掉消息有点类似,调用父类的onTouch和onTouchEvent方法
2、如果这个ViewGroup就是DecorView,那么就调用到了Activity的onTouchEvnet方法(此时没有onTouch方法)。
今天就先写到这里吧,后面我回用一个简单的Demo和一个简单的滑动冲突问题在深入学习TouchEvnet事件的。如果哪里没有写清楚的 ,欢迎拍砖。。。
posted on 2016-08-05 14:50 Sun‘刺眼的博客 阅读(1834) 评论(0) 编辑 收藏 举报