写一个方法判断数组内元素是否全部相同

function areAllElementsEqual(arr) {
  if (!arr || arr.length === 0) {
    return true; // Empty or null array is considered to have all elements equal
  }

  const firstElement = arr[0];

  for (let i = 1; i < arr.length; i++) {
    if (arr[i] !== firstElement) {
      return false;
    }
  }

  return true;
}


// Examples
console.log(areAllElementsEqual([1, 1, 1, 1])); // true
console.log(areAllElementsEqual([1, 2, 3, 4])); // false
console.log(areAllElementsEqual(['a', 'a', 'a'])); // true
console.log(areAllElementsEqual(['a', 'b', 'a'])); // false
console.log(areAllElementsEqual([])); // true - Empty array
console.log(areAllElementsEqual(null)); // true - Null array
console.log(areAllElementsEqual([NaN, NaN])); // false - NaN !== NaN
console.log(areAllElementsEqual([0, 0, 0, -0, 0])); // true - 0 and -0 are considered equal



// More robust version handling NaN (using every and isNaN):

function areAllElementsEqualIncludingNaN(arr) {
  if (!arr || arr.length === 0) {
    return true;
  }

  const firstElement = arr[0];

  return arr.every(element => {
    if (Number.isNaN(firstElement)) {
      return Number.isNaN(element);
    }
    return element === firstElement;
  });
}

console.log("Including NaN checks:");
console.log(areAllElementsEqualIncludingNaN([NaN, NaN])); // true
console.log(areAllElementsEqualIncludingNaN([NaN, 1]));   // false


This code provides two functions:

  1. areAllElementsEqual(arr): This is a simple and efficient solution for most cases. It checks if all elements in an array are equal to the first element. It handles empty and null arrays gracefully. However, it doesn't handle NaN values correctly because NaN !== NaN.

  2. areAllElementsEqualIncludingNaN(arr): This version uses the every() method and isNaN() to correctly handle NaN values. It's slightly less performant but more robust if you expect NaN values in your arrays.

Choose the function that best suits your needs based on whether you need to handle NaN correctly. The first function is generally sufficient and more efficient if you don't expect NaNs.

posted @   王铁柱6  阅读(8)  评论(0编辑  收藏  举报
相关博文:
阅读排行:
· Manus爆火,是硬核还是营销?
· 终于写完轮子一部分:tcp代理 了,记录一下
· 别再用vector<bool>了!Google高级工程师:这可能是STL最大的设计失误
· 单元测试从入门到精通
· 震惊!C++程序真的从main开始吗?99%的程序员都答错了
点击右上角即可分享
微信分享提示