golang与node.js的http对比测试
注:本文对于新版本的golang并不使用,go1以后go的性能已经有了比较好的提升,具体测试见: http://www.cnblogs.com/QLeelulu/archive/2012/08/12/2635261.html
听说Go是很不错的语言,了解了一下,一些特性确实很不错。
顺便测试了一下http与node.js的性能对比。
go的代码:
node.js的代码:
ab测试结果:
==** GO **==
$ ab -c 100 -n 1000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3<$Revision: 655654$>
Server Software:
Server Hostname: 127.0.0.1
Server Port: 8080
Document Path: /
Document Length: 1 bytes
Concurrency Level: 100
Time taken for tests: 0.322 seconds
Complete requests: 1000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 97000 bytes
HTML transferred: 1000 bytes
Requests per second: 3105.62 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 32.200 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.322 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 294.18 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 000.703
Processing: 13010.52955
Waiting: 13010.52955
Total: 43010.12955
==** Node.js **==
$ ab -c 100 -n 1000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3<$Revision: 655654$>
Server Software:
Server Hostname: 127.0.0.1
Server Port: 8080
Document Path: /
Document Length: 12 bytes
Concurrency Level: 100
Time taken for tests: 0.143 seconds
Complete requests: 1000
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 50000 bytes
HTML transferred: 12000 bytes
Requests per second: 6993.50 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 14.299 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.143 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 341.48 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 001.104
Processing: 2136.61330
Waiting: 2136.61330
Total: 2146.41430
webbench测试结果
==** GO **==
$ webbench -t 30 -c 100 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
Benchmarking: GET http://127.0.0.1:8080/
100 clients, running 30 sec.
Speed=146934 pages/min, 262032 bytes/sec.
Requests: 73467 susceed,0 failed.
==** Node.js **==
$ webbench -t 30 -c 100 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
Benchmarking: GET http://127.0.0.1:8080/
100 clients, running 30 sec.
Speed=485128 pages/min, 404273 bytes/sec.
Requests: 242564 susceed,0 failed.
从测试结果来看,node.js的HTTP SERVER性能是Go的两倍还多,而且让我比较郁闷的是,在用webbench进行测试的时候,可以看到go是用了我的笔记本上的四个核的CPU的,而node.js当然是只跑在一个核上,而Go居然还比node.js慢这么多。
然后我google,就看到:golang helloworld 45% slower than node.js
求真相!

作者:QLeelulu
出处:http://QLeelulu.cnblogs.com/
本文版权归作者和博客园共有,欢迎转载,但未经作者同意必须保留此段声明,且在文章页面明显位置给出原文连接,否则保留追究法律责任的权利

出处:http://QLeelulu.cnblogs.com/
本文版权归作者和博客园共有,欢迎转载,但未经作者同意必须保留此段声明,且在文章页面明显位置给出原文连接,否则保留追究法律责任的权利
分类:
JavaScript
【推荐】国内首个AI IDE,深度理解中文开发场景,立即下载体验Trae
【推荐】编程新体验,更懂你的AI,立即体验豆包MarsCode编程助手
【推荐】抖音旗下AI助手豆包,你的智能百科全书,全免费不限次数
【推荐】轻量又高性能的 SSH 工具 IShell:AI 加持,快人一步
· Linux系列:如何用 C#调用 C方法造成内存泄露
· AI与.NET技术实操系列(二):开始使用ML.NET
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 探究高空视频全景AR技术的实现原理
· 理解Rust引用及其生命周期标识(上)
· 阿里最新开源QwQ-32B,效果媲美deepseek-r1满血版,部署成本又又又降低了!
· 单线程的Redis速度为什么快?
· SQL Server 2025 AI相关能力初探
· 展开说说关于C#中ORM框架的用法!
· AI编程工具终极对决:字节Trae VS Cursor,谁才是开发者新宠?