随笔 - 153  文章 - 1  评论 - 1722  阅读 - 215万

golang与node.js的http对比测试

注:本文对于新版本的golang并不使用,go1以后go的性能已经有了比较好的提升,具体测试见: http://www.cnblogs.com/QLeelulu/archive/2012/08/12/2635261.html

 

听说Go是很不错的语言,了解了一下,一些特性确实很不错。

顺便测试了一下http与node.js的性能对比。

go的代码:

image
(注:是用8g, 8l编译的)

node.js的代码:

image

 

ab测试结果:

==** GO **==

复制代码
$ ab -c 100 -n 1000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
This is ApacheBench
, Version 2.3<$Revision: 655654$>

Server Software:
Server Hostname:
127.0.0.1
Server Port:
8080

Document
Path: /
Document Length:
1 bytes

Concurrency Level:
100
Time taken for tests: 0.322 seconds
Complete requests:
1000
Failed requests:
0
Write errors:
0
Total transferred:
97000 bytes
HTML transferred:
1000 bytes
Requests per second:
3105.62 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 32.200 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.322 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:
294.18 [Kbytes/sec] received

Connection Times
(ms)
min mean[
+/-sd] median max
Connect:
000.703
Processing:
13010.52955
Waiting:
13010.52955
Total:
43010.12955
复制代码

==** Node.js **==

复制代码
$ ab -c 100 -n 1000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
This is ApacheBench
, Version 2.3<$Revision: 655654$>

Server Software:
Server Hostname:
127.0.0.1
Server Port:
8080

Document
Path: /
Document Length:
12 bytes

Concurrency Level:
100
Time taken for tests: 0.143 seconds
Complete requests:
1000
Failed requests:
0
Write errors:
0
Total transferred:
50000 bytes
HTML transferred:
12000 bytes
Requests per second:
6993.50 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 14.299 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.143 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:
341.48 [Kbytes/sec] received

Connection Times
(ms)
min mean[
+/-sd] median max
Connect:
001.104
Processing:
2136.61330
Waiting:
2136.61330
Total:
2146.41430
复制代码

 

webbench测试结果

==** GO **==

复制代码
$ webbench -t 30 -c 100 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark
1.5
Copyright
(c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.

Benchmarking: GET http:
//127.0.0.1:8080/
100 clients, running 30 sec.

Speed
=146934 pages/min, 262032 bytes/sec.
Requests:
73467 susceed,0 failed.
复制代码

==** Node.js **==

复制代码
$ webbench -t 30 -c 100 http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark
1.5
Copyright
(c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.

Benchmarking: GET http:
//127.0.0.1:8080/
100 clients, running 30 sec.

Speed
=485128 pages/min, 404273 bytes/sec.
Requests:
242564 susceed,0 failed.
复制代码

从测试结果来看,node.js的HTTP SERVER性能是Go的两倍还多,而且让我比较郁闷的是,在用webbench进行测试的时候,可以看到go是用了我的笔记本上的四个核的CPU的,而node.js当然是只跑在一个核上,而Go居然还比node.js慢这么多。

然后我google,就看到:golang helloworld 45% slower than node.js

求真相!

posted on   Q.Lee.lulu  阅读(15515)  评论(11编辑  收藏  举报
编辑推荐:
· Linux系列:如何用 C#调用 C方法造成内存泄露
· AI与.NET技术实操系列(二):开始使用ML.NET
· 记一次.NET内存居高不下排查解决与启示
· 探究高空视频全景AR技术的实现原理
· 理解Rust引用及其生命周期标识(上)
阅读排行:
· 阿里最新开源QwQ-32B,效果媲美deepseek-r1满血版,部署成本又又又降低了!
· 单线程的Redis速度为什么快?
· SQL Server 2025 AI相关能力初探
· 展开说说关于C#中ORM框架的用法!
· AI编程工具终极对决:字节Trae VS Cursor,谁才是开发者新宠?
< 2011年9月 >
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8

点击右上角即可分享
微信分享提示