dbus-glib 和 GDBus 的区别
http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/gio-gdbus-codegen-20110412/ch29.html
Conceptual differences(概念上的区别)
The central concepts of D-Bus are modelled in a very similar way in dbus-glib and GDBus. Both have a objects representing connections, proxies and method invocations. But there are some important differences:
D-Bus最重要的概念在dbus-glib和GDBus中都是相似的.都用对象表示连接,代理 和 方法执行,但也有一些重要的不同点:
-
dbus-glib uses the libdbus reference implementation, GDBus doesn't. Instead, it relies on GIO streams as transport layer, and has its own implementation for the the D-Bus connection setup and authentication. Apart from using streams as transport, avoiding libdbus also lets GDBus avoid some thorny multithreading issues.
dbus-glib使用 libdbus reference implementation,GDBus不使用,而是依赖GIO流作为传输层,并且拥有一套自己实现的D-Bus连接设置和授权的方法.暂且不说GDBus使用流传输,
不使用libdbus可以使GDBus避免一些多线程方面的问题.
-
dbus-glib uses the GObject type system for method arguments and return values, including a homegrown container specialization mechanism. GDBus relies on the GVariant type system which is explicitly designed to match D-Bus types.
dbus-glib的方法参数和返回值使用Gobject类型系统,其中包含了一个特定结构的自有容器.GDBus依赖专为匹配D-Bus类型而设计的GVariant类型系统.
-
dbus-glib models only D-Bus interfaces and does not provide any types for objects. GDBus models both D-Bus interfaces (via the GDBusInterface, GDBusProxy and GDBusInterfaceStub types) and objects (via the GDBusObject, GDBusObjectStub and GDBusObjectProxy types).
dbus-glib 只能提供D-Bus接口,不为对象提供任何类型,
GDBus同时提供D-Bus接口(通过GDBusInterface, GDBusProxy 和 GDBusInterfaceStub 类型)和对象接口(通过GDBusObject, GDBusObjectStub 和 GDBusObjectProxy 类型)
-
GDBus includes native support for the org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties (via the GDBusProxy type) and org.freedesktop.DBus.ObjectManager D-Bus interfaces, dbus-glib doesn't.
GDBus 为org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties (通过 GDBusProxy 类型) 和 org.freedesktop.DBus.ObjectManager D-Bus接口,包含了本地支持,dbus-glib没有.
-
The typical way to export an object in dbus-glib involves generating glue code from XML introspection data using dbus-binding-tool. GDBus provides a similar tool called gdbus-codegen that can also generate Docbook D-Bus interface documentation.
dbus-glib中导出对象的典型方法是使用dbus-binding-tool根据XML内省数据生成代码,GDBus也提供了一个类似的工具叫做gdbus-codegen,这个工具也可以生成Docbook D-Bus接口文件.
-
dbus-glib doesn't provide any convenience API for owning and watching bus names, GDBus provides the
g_bus_own_name()
andg_bus_watch_name()
family of convenience functions.
dbus-glib不提供战友和监视总线名字的方便的API,GDBus提供了g_bus_own_name()
和g_bus_watch_name()
系列的方便函数.
-
GDBus provides API to parse, generate and work with Introspection XML, dbus-glib doesn't.
GDBus提供API来解析、生成 和 工作的内省XML,dbus-glib不提供。
API comparison
Table. dbus-glib APIs and their GDBus counterparts
Owning bus names
Using dbus-glib, you typically call RequestName manually to own a name, like in the following excerpt:
使用dbus-glib来占有一个总线名字的典型做法是手动调用RequestName ,像下面的例子:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 |
error = NULL;
res = dbus_g_proxy_call (system_bus_proxy,
"RequestName",
&error,
G_TYPE_STRING, NAME_TO_CLAIM,
G_TYPE_UINT, DBUS_NAME_FLAG_ALLOW_REPLACEMENT,
G_TYPE_INVALID,
G_TYPE_UINT, &result,
G_TYPE_INVALID);
if (!res)
{
if (error != NULL)
{
g_warning ("Failed to acquire %s: %s",
NAME_TO_CLAIM, error->message);
g_error_free (error);
}
else
{
g_warning ("Failed to acquire %s", NAME_TO_CLAIM);
}
goto out;
}
if (result != DBUS_REQUEST_NAME_REPLY_PRIMARY_OWNER)
{
if (error != NULL)
{
g_warning ("Failed to acquire %s: %s",
NAME_TO_CLAIM, error->message);
g_error_free (error);
}
else
{
g_warning ("Failed to acquire %s", NAME_TO_CLAIM);
}
exit (1);
}
dbus_g_proxy_add_signal (system_bus_proxy, "NameLost",
G_TYPE_STRING, G_TYPE_INVALID);
dbus_g_proxy_connect_signal (system_bus_proxy, "NameLost",
G_CALLBACK (on_name_lost), NULL, NULL);
/* further setup ... */
|
While you can do things this way with GDBus too, using g_dbus_proxy_call_sync()
, it is much nicer to use the high-level API for this:
当然你可以使用GDBus的方式,调用函数g_dbus_proxy_call_sync()来完成同样的功能
,但是使用高级的API(g_bus_own_name)是更好地方式.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 |
static void
on_name_acquired (GDBusConnection *connection,
const gchar *name,
gpointer user_data)
{
/* further setup ... */
}
/* ... */
owner_id = g_bus_own_name (G_BUS_TYPE_SYSTEM,
NAME_TO_CLAIM,
G_BUS_NAME_OWNER_FLAGS_ALLOW_REPLACEMENT,
on_bus_acquired,
on_name_acquired,
on_name_lost,
NULL,
NULL);
g_main_loop_run (loop);
g_bus_unown_name (owner_id);
|
Note that g_bus_own_name()
works asynchronously and requires you to enter your mainloop to await the on_name_aquired()
callback. Also note that in order to avoid race conditions (e.g. when your service is activated by a method call), you have to export your manager object before acquiring the name. The on_bus_acquired()
callback is the right place to do such preparations.
需要注意的是g_bus_own_name 工作方式是异步的,并且需要你进入mainloop来等待on_name_aquired()这个callback被调用.还需要注意的是为了防止条件竞争(例如你的服务是同方法调用来启动的),你必须在就on_name_aquired()回调之前导出管理对象,on_bus_acquired()这个callback中是导出管理对象的正确位置.
Creating proxies for well-known names
dbus-glib lets you create proxy objects for well-known names, like the following example:
1 2 3 4 |
proxy = dbus_g_proxy_new_for_name (system_bus_connection,
"org.freedesktop.Accounts",
"/org/freedesktop/Accounts",
"org.freedesktop.Accounts");
|
For a DBusGProxy constructed like this, method calls will be sent to the current owner of the name, and that owner can change over time.
The same can be achieved with GDBusProxy:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
error = NULL;
proxy = g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync (G_BUS_TYPE_SYSTEM,
G_DBUS_PROXY_FLAGS_NONE,
NULL, /* GDBusInterfaceInfo */
"org.freedesktop.Accounts",
"/org/freedesktop/Accounts",
"org.freedesktop.Accounts",
NULL, /* GCancellable */
&error);
|
For an added layer of safety, you can specify what D-Bus interface the proxy is expected to conform to by using the GDBusInterfaceInfo type. Additionally, GDBusProxy loads, caches and tracks changes to the D-Bus properties on the remote object. It also sets up match rules so D-Bus signals from the remote object are delivered locally.
The GDBusProxy type normally isn't used directly - instead proxies subclassing GDBusProxy generated by gdbus-codegen is used, see the section called “Using gdbus-codegen”