代码改变世界

Entity Framework做IN查询

  JustRun  阅读(6012)  评论(10编辑  收藏  举报

开发中遇到的Too high level of nesting for select错误

项目使用了Entity Framework结合Mysql, 遇到了一个非常奇怪的性能问题,一个看起来非常简单的查询通过不了。

报出错误, “Too high level of nesting for select”。

整个查询非常简单,只是从表中取到属于一个集合中的id的数据, 比如从表中取到OfficeId 是1, 2,3,6的数据。

 

Expression<Func<office, bool>> filter = office => officeIds.Any(id => id == office.OfficeID);
var offices = _officeRepository.GetOffices(filter).ToList();

开始一直认为是Mysql的问题,是不是因为Id太多, mysql性能不好,后来发现问题出在EF的使用上。

 

实际的查询语句

后来调试,发现实际执行的sql语句是这样的,而不是我预想的in查询,而是翻译成了非常复杂的查询

复制代码
SELECT
`Extent1`.`OfficeID`,
`Extent1`.`DoctorPhone`,
`Extent1`.`Name`,
`Extent1`.`RegionID`,
`Extent1`.`PriceTier2`,
`Extent1`.`PriceTier3`,
`Extent1`.`PracticeManagementSoftware`,
`Extent1`.`ServerHost`,
`Extent1`.`ServerLogin`,
FROM `office` AS `Extent1`
WHERE EXISTS(SELECT
1 AS `C1`
FROM (SELECT `UnionAll31`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll30`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll29`.`C1` FROM 
(SELECT `UnionAll28`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll27`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll26`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll25`.`C1` FROM
(SELECT `UnionAll24`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll23`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll22`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll21`.`C1` FROM
(SELECT `UnionAll20`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll19`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll18`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll17`.`C1` FROM
(SELECT `UnionAll16`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll15`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll14`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll13`.`C1` FROM
(SELECT `UnionAll12`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll11`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll10`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll9`.`C1` FROM
(SELECT `UnionAll8`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll7`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll6`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll5`.`C1` FROM
(SELECT `UnionAll4`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll3`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll2`.`C1` FROM (SELECT `UnionAll1`.`C1` FROM
(SELECT 69 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable1` UNION ALL SELECT 20 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable2`) AS `UnionAll1`
UNION ALL SELECT 55 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable3`) AS `UnionAll2` UNION ALL SELECT 67 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable4`)
AS `UnionAll3` UNION ALL SELECT 9 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable5`) AS `UnionAll4` UNION ALL SELECT 51 AS `C1` FROM
(SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable6`) AS `UnionAll5` UNION ALL SELECT 59 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable7`) AS `UnionAll6` UNION ALL
SELECT 18 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable8`) AS `UnionAll7` UNION ALL SELECT 19 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable9`) AS `UnionAll8`
UNION ALL SELECT 8 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable10`) AS `UnionAll9` UNION ALL SELECT 17 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable11`) AS `UnionAll10`
UNION ALL SELECT 44 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable12`) AS `UnionAll11` UNION ALL SELECT 4 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable13`) AS `UnionAll12`
UNION ALL SELECT 3 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable14`) AS `UnionAll13` UNION ALL SELECT 58 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable15`) AS `UnionAll14`
UNION ALL SELECT 56 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable16`) AS `UnionAll15` UNION ALL SELECT 57 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable17`) AS `UnionAll16`
UNION ALL SELECT 52 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable18`) AS `UnionAll17` UNION ALL SELECT 29 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable19`) AS `UnionAll18`
UNION ALL SELECT 64 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable20`) AS `UnionAll19` UNION ALL SELECT 48 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable21`) AS `UnionAll20`
UNION ALL SELECT 15 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable22`) AS `UnionAll21` UNION ALL SELECT 65 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable23`) AS `UnionAll22`
UNION ALL SELECT 61 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable24`) AS `UnionAll23` UNION ALL SELECT 50 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable25`) AS `UnionAll24`
UNION ALL SELECT 62 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable26`) AS `UnionAll25` UNION ALL SELECT 16 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable27`) AS `UnionAll26`
UNION ALL SELECT 68 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable28`) AS `UnionAll27` UNION ALL SELECT 49 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable29`) AS `UnionAll28`
UNION ALL SELECT 12 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable30`) AS `UnionAll29` UNION ALL SELECT 11 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable31`) AS `UnionAll30`
UNION ALL SELECT 7 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable32`) AS `UnionAll31` UNION ALL SELECT 5 AS `C1` FROM (SELECT 1 AS `X`) AS `SingleRowTable33`) AS `UnionAll32` WHERE (`UnionAll32`.`C1`) = `Extent1`.`OfficeID`)
复制代码

 

修改成IN查询

修改后的代码是,

Expression<Func<office, bool>> filter = office => officeIds.Contains(office.OfficeID);
var offices = _officeRepository.GetOffices(filter).ToList();

只是将Any方法,替换成了Contains, EF就正确的翻译成想要的IN查询了:

复制代码
SELECT
`Extent1`.`OfficeID`,
`Extent1`.`DoctorPhone`,
`Extent1`.`Name`,
`Extent1`.`RegionID`,
`Extent1`.`IsActive`,
`Extent1`.`IsDeleted`,
`Extent1`.`InsuranceOnly`,
`Extent1`.`MinimumFlatRate`,
FROM `office` AS `Extent1`
WHERE `Extent1`.`OfficeID` IN ( 69,20,55,67,9,51,59,18,19,8,17,44,4,3,58,56,57,52,29,64,48,15,65,61,50,62,16,68,49,12,11,7,5 ) 
复制代码

到这里,问题已经解决了,看来EF中的一些细节还需要自己不断地学习和实践。

编辑推荐:
· .NET Core 中如何实现缓存的预热?
· 从 HTTP 原因短语缺失研究 HTTP/2 和 HTTP/3 的设计差异
· AI与.NET技术实操系列:向量存储与相似性搜索在 .NET 中的实现
· 基于Microsoft.Extensions.AI核心库实现RAG应用
· Linux系列:如何用heaptrack跟踪.NET程序的非托管内存泄露
阅读排行:
· TypeScript + Deepseek 打造卜卦网站:技术与玄学的结合
· 阿里巴巴 QwQ-32B真的超越了 DeepSeek R-1吗?
· 【译】Visual Studio 中新的强大生产力特性
· 【设计模式】告别冗长if-else语句:使用策略模式优化代码结构
· 10年+ .NET Coder 心语 ── 封装的思维:从隐藏、稳定开始理解其本质意义
点击右上角即可分享
微信分享提示