START TRANSACTION, COMMIT, and ROLLBACK Syntax-from cyber
START TRANSACTION [WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT] BEGIN [WORK] COMMIT [WORK] [AND [NO] CHAIN] [[NO] RELEASE] ROLLBACK [WORK] [AND [NO] CHAIN] [[NO] RELEASE] SET autocommit = {0 | 1}
These statements provide control over use of transactions:
-
START TRANSACTION
orBEGIN
start a new transaction. -
COMMIT
commits the current transaction, making its changes permanent. -
ROLLBACK
rolls back the current transaction, canceling its changes. -
SET autocommit
disables or enables the default autocommit mode for the current session.
By default, MySQL runs with autocommit mode enabled. This means that as soon as you execute a statement that updates (modifies) a table, MySQL stores the update on disk to make it permanent. The change cannot be rolled back.
To disable autocommit mode implicitly for a single series of statements, use the START TRANSACTION
statement:
START TRANSACTION; SELECT @A:=SUM(salary) FROM table1 WHERE type=1; UPDATE table2 SET summary=@A WHERE type=1; COMMIT;
With START TRANSACTION
, autocommit remains disabled until you end the transaction with COMMIT
or ROLLBACK
. The autocommit mode then reverts to its previous state.
You can also begin a transaction like this:
START TRANSACTION WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT;
The WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT
option starts a consistent read for storage engines that are capable of it. This applies only to InnoDB
. The effect is the same as issuing a START TRANSACTION
followed by a SELECT
from any InnoDB
table. See Section 14.6.3.1.2, “Consistent Nonlocking Reads”. The WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT
option does not change the current transaction isolation level, so it provides a consistent snapshot only if the current isolation level is one that permits a consistent read. The only isolation level that permits a consistent read is REPEATABLE READ
. For all other isolation levels, the WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT
clause is ignored.
Many APIs used for writing MySQL client applications (such as JDBC) provide their own methods for starting transactions that can (and sometimes should) be used instead of sending a START TRANSACTION
statement from the client. See Chapter 21, Connectors and APIs, or the documentation for your API, for more information.
To disable autocommit mode explicitly, use the following statement:
SET autocommit=0;
After disabling autocommit mode by setting the autocommit
variable to zero, changes to transaction-safe tables (such as those for InnoDB
or NDBCLUSTER
) are not made permanent immediately. You must use COMMIT
to store your changes to disk or ROLLBACK
to ignore the changes.
autocommit
is a session variable and must be set for each session. To disable autocommit mode for each new connection, see the description of the autocommit
system variable at Section 5.1.4, “Server System Variables”.
BEGIN
and BEGIN WORK
are supported as aliases of START TRANSACTION
for initiating a transaction. START TRANSACTION
is standard SQL syntax and is the recommended way to start an ad-hoc transaction.
The BEGIN
statement differs from the use of the BEGIN
keyword that starts a BEGIN ... END
compound statement. The latter does not begin a transaction. See Section 13.6.1, “BEGIN ... END Compound-Statement Syntax”.
Within all stored programs (stored procedures and functions, triggers, and events), the parser treats BEGIN [WORK]
as the beginning of a BEGIN ... END
block. Begin a transaction in this context with START TRANSACTION
instead.
The optional WORK
keyword is supported for COMMIT
and ROLLBACK
, as are the CHAIN
and RELEASE
clauses. CHAIN
and RELEASE
can be used for additional control over transaction completion. The value of the completion_type
system variable determines the default completion behavior. See Section 5.1.4, “Server System Variables”.
The AND CHAIN
clause causes a new transaction to begin as soon as the current one ends, and the new transaction has the same isolation level as the just-terminated transaction. The RELEASE
clause causes the server to disconnect the current client session after terminating the current transaction. Including the NO
keyword suppresses CHAIN
or RELEASE
completion, which can be useful if the completion_type
system variable is set to cause chaining or release completion by default.
Beginning a transaction causes any pending transaction to be committed. See Section 13.3.3, “Statements That Cause an Implicit Commit”, for more information.
Beginning a transaction also causes table locks acquired with LOCK TABLES
to be released, as though you had executed UNLOCK TABLES
. Beginning a transaction does not release a global read lock acquired with FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK
.
For best results, transactions should be performed using only tables managed by a single transaction-safe storage engine. Otherwise, the following problems can occur:
-
If you use tables from more than one transaction-safe storage engine (such as
InnoDB
), and the transaction isolation level is notSERIALIZABLE
, it is possible that when one transaction commits, another ongoing transaction that uses the same tables will see only some of the changes made by the first transaction. That is, the atomicity of transactions is not guaranteed with mixed engines and inconsistencies can result. (If mixed-engine transactions are infrequent, you can useSET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL
to set the isolation level toSERIALIZABLE
on a per-transaction basis as necessary.) -
If you use tables that are not transaction-safe within a transaction, changes to those tables are stored at once, regardless of the status of autocommit mode.
-
If you issue a
ROLLBACK
statement after updating a nontransactional table within a transaction, anER_WARNING_NOT_COMPLETE_ROLLBACK
warning occurs. Changes to transaction-safe tables are rolled back, but not changes to nontransaction-safe tables.
Each transaction is stored in the binary log in one chunk, upon COMMIT
. Transactions that are rolled back are not logged. (Exception: Modifications to nontransactional tables cannot be rolled back. If a transaction that is rolled back includes modifications to nontransactional tables, the entire transaction is logged with a ROLLBACK
statement at the end to ensure that modifications to the nontransactional tables are replicated.) See Section 5.2.4, “The Binary Log”.
You can change the isolation level for transactions with the SET TRANSACTION
statement. See Section 13.3.6, “SET TRANSACTION Syntax”.
Rolling back can be a slow operation that may occur implicitly without the user having explicitly asked for it (for example, when an error occurs). Because of this, SHOW PROCESSLIST
displays Rolling back
in the State
column for the session, not only for explicit rollbacks performed with the ROLLBACK
statement but also for implicit rollbacks.