sumo-关于颜色的修改
Let me explain the key differences between route2poly.py and the TraCI-based code I provided:
- Purpose and Functionality:
route2poly.py
: Creates polygon (polyline) visualizations of routes and saves them to a .poly.xml file. These are static visualizations that show the entire route path at once. It's used to visualize route paths before simulation.- TraCI code: Dynamically changes edge colors during the simulation runtime. It allows real-time color changes based on conditions while the simulation is running.
- When to Use Each:
-
Use
route2poly.py
when you want to:- Visualize all possible routes in your network
- Create a static visualization of routes
- Generate a permanent .poly.xml file for later use
# Example usage of route2poly.py python route2poly.py network.net.xml routes.rou.xml --hue 0.5 --saturation 1
-
Use TraCI when you want to:
- Change colors dynamically during simulation
- Respond to real-time events or conditions
- Make interactive visualizations
# Example of TraCI color change traci.edge.setColor(edge_id, (255, 0, 0)) # Changes color in real-time
- Color Control:
-
route2poly.py
:- Uses HSV color model (Hue, Saturation, Brightness)
- Colors are set when generating the polygon file
- Options like
--hue
,--saturation
,--brightness
-
TraCI:
- Uses RGB color model
- Colors can be changed at any time during simulation
- Direct RGB value control (0-255 for each channel)
- Output:
route2poly.py
creates a .poly.xml file:
<polygons>
<poly id="route1" color="0.5,1,1" shape="x1,y1 x2,y2..."/>
</polygons>
- TraCI modifies the visualization directly in SUMO-GUI without creating additional files.
Would you like me to show you how to combine both approaches or explain more about either method?